Re: [ghc-steering-committee] Please review #517: Require implementors before proposal submission, Shepherd: Simon PJ

If we do come back to it, it's going to be stronger evidence that something in that space is needed. On Mon, Oct 3, 2022 at 10:26 AM Simon Peyton Jones < simon.peytonjones@gmail.com> wrote:

As you say, it's not that big a deal. I'm content to reject for now. I'm sure we'll keep coming back to it!

Simon

On Sun, 2 Oct 2022 at 13:03, Joachim Breitner wrote:

...

Hi,

Am Dienstag, dem 20.09.2022 um 15:43 +0200 schrieb Joachim Breitner:

...

So given that we don’t have a consensus, I suggest to not spend more time on it, let’s reject it (and remember where it is to be revived, if and when the problem becomes more clearer visible).

no complaints about this either? I’ll mark it as rejected in a few days unless someone shouts.

Cheers, Joachim

-- Joachim Breitner mail@joachim-breitner.de http://www.joachim-breitner.de/

_______________________________________________ ghc-steering-committee mailing list ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee

_______________________________________________ ghc-steering-committee mailing list ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee