Re: [ghc-steering-committee] Proposal 34: The INCOMPLETE_CONTEXTS pragma proposal

Hi, I approve your correction. Actually, to set good procedural precedence, I would suggest that the Shepherd (in this case Roman) marks the proposal as accepted or rejected on Github, and includes a rationale (esp. for a rejection). Greetings, Joachim Am Dienstag, den 21.03.2017, 12:37 +1100 schrieb Manuel M T Chakravarty:

Approved? I assume, you mean rejected. (You approve the rejection ;)

...

Am 21.03.2017 um 10:26 schrieb Joachim Breitner :

Hi,

Am Sonntag, den 12.03.2017, 15:52 +0000 schrieb Roman Leshchinskiy:

...

I propose we reject this.

there seems to be consensus on this. If nobody shouts out real soon now, I will official mark this as approved tomorrow or so.

Greetings, Joachim --  Joachim “nomeata” Breitner   mail@joachim-breitner.de • https://www.joachim-breitner.de/   XMPP: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de • OpenPGP-Key: 0xF0FBF51F   Debian Developer: nomeata@debian.org_____________________________ __________________ ghc-steering-committee mailing list ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-comm ittee

-- Joachim “nomeata” Breitner   mail@joachim-breitner.de • https://www.joachim-breitner.de/   XMPP: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de • OpenPGP-Key: 0xF0FBF51F   Debian Developer: nomeata@debian.org