
Dear Chris, what is the status of this? In https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/303#issuecomment-6201227... the authors are getting a bit impatient, and it seems you never commented on the github thread (not even a “I’m looking into this”. Can you maybe make some noise over there? Cheers, Joachim Am Freitag, den 03.01.2020, 11:43 -0600 schrieb Christopher Allen:
This is an interesting proposal. The merits of the proposal are one thing, but it also feels like someone is proposing to renovate an abandoned corner of GHC. I'll try to weigh these orthogonal benefits as best I can.
I'll take a deeper look after work.
Cheers, Chris
On Fri, Jan 3, 2020 at 11:30 AM Joachim Breitner
wrote: Of course I mean Chris Allen. Sorry for the confusion.
Am Freitag, den 03.01.2020, 15:20 +0100 schrieb Joachim Breitner:
Dear Committee,
this is your secretary speaking:
Constraint based arrow notation has been proposed by Aleix King https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/303 https://github.com/lexi-lambda/ghc-proposals/blob/constraint-based-arrow-not...
I propose Chris Done as the shepherd.
Please guide us to a conclusion as outlined in https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals#committee-process
Thanks, Joachim -- Joachim Breitner mail@joachim-breitner.de http://www.joachim-breitner.de/
_______________________________________________ ghc-steering-committee mailing list ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee
-- Joachim Breitner mail@joachim-breitner.de http://www.joachim-breitner.de/