Dear Committee, Richard has proposed an update to the PartialTypeSignatures extension. The proposal is quite detailed and I recommend the Committee read the whole thing as my summary will not do it justice. But the gist is that the `_` has acquired many different meanings in Haskell in different syntactic contexts and under different sets of extensions. And the result is quite confusing! Richard describes four different meanings of `_` in the proposal. But I don't think Richard's proposal does enough to remedy the situation. I still find the proposed change hard to reason about and would prefer to further simplify the language here. I suggested an alternate direction[1] on GitHub that I think would make a meaningful improvement. Looking back at the proposal again, it may not be as far from Richard's proposal as I had originally thought. But I think it is important to have different syntax to express the two modalities of "I don't care" (elision/wildcard) and "I don't know" (hole/query). My recommendation is to not accept this proposal in its current form. Eric [1]: https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/194#discussion_r12575176... On Thu, May 25, 2023, at 01:55, Joachim Breitner wrote:
Dear Committee,
Richard resubmits updated partial type signatures:
https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/194
https://github.com/goldfirere/ghc-proposals/blob/updated-partial-type-sigs/p...
I’d like to ask Eric to shepherd this proposal.
Please guide us to a conclusion as outlined in https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals#committee-process
Cheers, Joachim
-- Joachim Breitner mail@joachim-breitner.de http://www.joachim-breitner.de/
_______________________________________________ ghc-steering-committee mailing list ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee