Good for me. The fix is very conservative, maybe we can have dots in some
positions. But this way we are mostly guaranteed backward compatibility
when we make a more informed decision.
On Wed, 1 Feb 2023 at 10:11, Joachim Breitner
Hi,
implementation work on #170 led to insights that called for small adjustments to the design, namely to remove dot from characters allowed in overloaded labels.
The proposal is amended at https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/573.
This should be part of 9.6, so I’d like to fast-track this for acceptance. If you disagree with this process please complain until the end of the week (Sun Feb 5).
Cheers, Joachim
-- Joachim Breitner mail@joachim-breitner.de http://www.joachim-breitner.de/
_______________________________________________ ghc-steering-committee mailing list ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee