On Thu, 28 Nov 2019 at 10:06, Joachim Breitner
Dear Committee,
this is your secretary speaking:
Unlifed Datatypes has been proposed by Sebastian Graf https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/265
https://github.com/sgraf812/ghc-proposals/blob/unlifted-data/proposals/0000-...
I propose Simon Marlow as the shepherd, as the expert on low-level stuff.
Please reach consensus as described in https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals#committee-process I suggest you make a recommendation, in a new e-mail thread with the proposal number in the subject, about the decision, maybe point out debatable points, and assume that anyone who stays quiet agrees with you.
BTW, I just checked the proposal process documentation, and it says: - * Now the shepherd proposes to accept or reject the proposal. To do so, they - post their recommendation, with a rationale, on the GitHub discussion thread, - label the pull request as Pending committee review, - re-title the proposal pull request, appending (under review) at the end. (This enables easy email filtering.) - drop a short mail to the mailing list informing the committee that discussion has started. which isn't exactly in line with the paragraph above. Shouldn't the first line be something like "post their recommendation, with a rationale, to the committee mailing list", and remove the final bullet? Cheers Simon
Thanks, Joachim -- Joachim Breitner mail@joachim-breitner.de http://www.joachim-breitner.de/
_______________________________________________ ghc-steering-committee mailing list ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee