
@Simon Peyton Jones
Thanks Erik for driving us towards a conclusion
- QualifiedStrings: yes - QualifiedNumerics: yes but precisely as for QualifiedDo and QualifiedStrings, i.e. without new magic for natural numbers. - QualifiedLists: yes, but I'm not sure about the precise API
I have written comments on all three threads.
If you yourself have minor reservations, can you express them on the relevant GitHub threads?
Everyone: please express your views.
Simon
On Fri, 19 Sept 2025 at 01:28, Erik de Castro Lopo
wrote: Dear Committee,
The original Qualified Literals proposal [1] has been split into 3 separate proposals:
* Qualfied Strings [2] * Qualified Numerics [3] * Qualified Lists [4]
Since this proposal has already been open for so long and had so much discussion, I have recommened that the committee reaches a decision by Oct 7.
I had a few minor reservations about Numerics and Lists, mainly about the fact that there are still options on how they would be implemented but have recommended all 3 are accepted.
Thanks, Erik
[1] https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/698 [2] https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/723 [3] https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/724 [4] https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/725 -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Erik de Castro Lopo http://www.mega-nerd.com/ _______________________________________________ ghc-steering-committee mailing list -- ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org To unsubscribe send an email to ghc-steering-committee-leave@haskell.org
_______________________________________________ ghc-steering-committee mailing list -- ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org To unsubscribe send an email to ghc-steering-committee-leave@haskell.org
-- -- Matthías Páll Gissurarson http://mpg.is/