
Asked for a few questions to be answered on Github. Other than that, this sounds absolutely a positive change to me. On Thu, 30 Mar 2023 at 10:58, Simon Peyton Jones < simon.peytonjones@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear Steering Commitee
Please review https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/579
I propose acceptance. On this one I'll take silence as assent.
Please reply by Tuesday 4 April
Simon
On Thu, 30 Mar 2023 at 09:54, Joachim Breitner
wrote: Dear Committee,
Adam proposes adding a section on backward compatibility to the proposal template:
https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/579
Richard said that this, even although likely uncontroverisal, should have broad committee visibility, so I’m assigning this to Simon PJ (as the chair) to shepherd this.
Please guide us to a conclusion as outlined in https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals#committee-process
Cheers, Joachim
-- Joachim Breitner mail@joachim-breitner.de http://www.joachim-breitner.de/
_______________________________________________ ghc-steering-committee mailing list ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee
_______________________________________________ ghc-steering-committee mailing list ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee