Re: [ghc-steering-committee] Record dot syntax: vote results

I think this is a fine conclusion to the saga, personally. C2a is one of the more middle-of-the-ground options, and it's refreshing to have an election that chooses such a candidate. It's been slow, yes, but I think this phase of the saga has highlighted the strengths of the committee process, in that we had a deliberate, carefully reasoned vote. Thanks for running the vote algorithm, Joachim, and for your careful shepherding, Simon. Richard

On Mar 30, 2020, at 5:48 PM, Joachim Breitner wrote:

Dear Committe,

thanks all for voting. The ranking of votes is now

C2a > C2b > C4 > C1 > C7 > C6 > C3 > C5

In particular C2a beats every other options by 7:4 or more, and is therefore the result of this poll.

You can see more statistics at https://www.condorcet.vote/Vote/AB23CE70AC/

So, does this conclude this saga?

Cheers, Joachim

-- Joachim Breitner mail@joachim-breitner.de http://www.joachim-breitner.de/

_______________________________________________ ghc-steering-committee mailing list ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee