Re: [ghc-steering-committee] [ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals] Lazy unboxed tuples / warn on unbanged strict patterns (#35)

Hi, Am Freitag, den 27.01.2017, 09:16 -0500 schrieb Richard Eisenberg:

...

On Jan 27, 2017, at 8:02 AM, Simon Peyton Jones wrote:

OK.  I propose that we change this.  Remove the four-week language.  Instead:

* At any time the author of a proposal can transition from "Discussion" to  "Decision", by changing the status of the proposal [link to explain how],  and by sending email to the committee to signal the change.

 The author should do this only when there has been adequate opportunity  for the community to respond to the proposal.  It would be unusual  to consider adequate any period less than four weeks from the last  substantial change to the proposal.  But this is not a hard and fast  rule.  It's the intent that matters.

* Any proposal in "Discussion" that has had no input for more than four weeks  may be moved "Dormant" status (by anyone).  The goal here is simply to keep manageable  the list of proposals that are being actively worked on.  The author  is free to resurrect it to "Discussion" status.

+1

+1 -- Joachim “nomeata” Breitner   mail@joachim-breitner.de • https://www.joachim-breitner.de/   XMPP: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de • OpenPGP-Key: 0xF0FBF51F   Debian Developer: nomeata@debian.org