Re: [ghc-steering-committee] Mutable constructor fields

I'm keen to be an early user and tester of this when the implementation work gets underway. Of course, given their interest in this topic Ryan Yates and Ed Kmett are also likely consumers. -Ryan On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 3:07 AM, Simon Marlow wrote:

I haven't been pushing this forwards mainly because I don't have the bandwidth myself to work on the implementation, but if someone else is able to do that, that would be great.

There are some details of the spec to iron out. One is a syntactic decision - whether to use a new keyword "mutable" to indicate mutable fields or not - I'll request comments on the proposal. There are other details of the spec to iron out related to the implementation, but I think it'll be easier to work through those by starting on a prototype.

Cheers Simon

On 3 February 2017 at 23:37, Joachim Breitner wrote:

...

Hi,

Am Freitag, den 03.02.2017, 15:29 -0800 schrieb Iavor Diatchki:

...

Hello,

I am not sure what's the process for this,

it should be labeled as “under review discussion”, ideally by the author if the author thinks it is ready for that.

Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim “nomeata” Breitner mail@joachim-breitner.de • https://www.joachim-breitner.de/ XMPP: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de • OpenPGP-Key: 0xF0FBF51F Debian Developer: nomeata@debian.org _______________________________________________ ghc-steering-committee mailing list ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee

_______________________________________________ ghc-steering-committee mailing list ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee