Hi, if we had a simpler voting scheme, it would be obvious to everyone where wer are standing. But I don’t expect that any of us can just glance at the Google Sheet and see how things are standing. But this obscurity is of course not intended! So to give a preview (with Simon Marlow’s vote still missing, and of course everyone still able to refine their votes) we currently have this result: C2a > C2b > C4 > C6 = C1 > C3 = C7 > C5 where C2a beats all other options by 6:4 or more. In a way, C2a is one of the less bold moves. It is a typical property of ranked voting schemes that they tend to elect more moderate options. Fun fact: While we have a natural Condorcet winner (an option preferred over any other option by a majority), we do not have a Condorcet loser: _Every_ option is preferred over some other option by a majority, because C5 beats C1, C1 beats C3, C3 beats C5. (Now I wonder: did I confuse C2a and C2b in my vote last week? What was my intention back then? Not sure any more… I guess I valued the concept that you can take `x` and replace it with `(f x)` without affecting the surrounding concepts.) Cheers, Joachim -- Joachim Breitner mail@joachim-breitner.de http://www.joachim-breitner.de/