Richard, are you ok with this position? I think you were the only one with a lingering concern about the proposal. On Mon, Sep 12, 2022, at 11:32, Joachim Breitner wrote:
Hi,
Am Montag, dem 12.09.2022 um 09:05 -0400 schrieb Eric Seidel:
My view remains that the exact mechanism of public/internal separation does not need to be fleshed out in order to accept this proposal. It can be hashed out in parallel with the implementation.
I agree with that – the concerns are nicely separated this way.
Cheers, Joachim
-- Joachim Breitner mail@joachim-breitner.de http://www.joachim-breitner.de/
_______________________________________________ ghc-steering-committee mailing list ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee