Re: [ghc-steering-committee] Please review #194: Updated partial type signatures, Recommendation: Reject

Hi, sending a proposal back for revision is something you as the shepherd can just do, without a vote or so. Just explain what’s missing in the proposal on the github PR, and change the label. Thanks for shepherding! Joachim Am Samstag, dem 02.09.2023 um 20:35 -0400 schrieb Eric Seidel:

Needs revision. I do think this is a problem worth solving!

Sent from my iPhone

...

On Sep 2, 2023, at 17:35, Joachim Breitner wrote:

Hi,

...

Am Samstag, dem 02.09.2023 um 16:05 -0400 schrieb Eric Seidel: My recommendation is to not accept this proposal in its current form.

is that more a hard reject (i.e. we don't encourage anyone to work on that proposal anymore), or a more a soft “needs revision”?

Cheers, Joachim

-- Joachim Breitner mail@joachim-breitner.de http://www.joachim-breitner.de/

_______________________________________________ ghc-steering-committee mailing list ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee

_______________________________________________ ghc-steering-committee mailing list ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee

-- Joachim Breitner mail@joachim-breitner.de http://www.joachim-breitner.de/