
Agreed on both points: LGTM; lets keep the CLC in the loop.
On 29 Jun 2023, at 08:16, Simon Peyton Jones
wrote: Looks good to me.
I have suggested that @monoidal opens a CLC issue. (This change the `base` API.)
Simon
On Thu, 29 Jun 2023 at 07:21, Joachim Breitner
mailto:mail@joachim-breitner.de> wrote: Dear committee,
Krzysztof Gogolewski in https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/596 amends the sized literals proposal so that GHC uses the syntax 42#Int8 instead of (intToInt8# 42#) in the stock derived Show instances for data types with sized unboxed numbers.
Implementation is also ready.
Now that we have a syntax for these literals it’s clear that we want to use them in the show instances.
There is no risk of breaking Show-Read-roundtripping, as Read instances cannot be derived (at the moment).
This is a change in behavior of Show, so we should think for a moment how this affects stability. But none of the libraries in libraries/, in particularly not base, are affected by this change, according to Krzysztof.
So I recommend to accept this.
Cheers, Joachim
-- Joachim Breitner mail@joachim-breitner.de mailto:mail@joachim-breitner.de http://www.joachim-breitner.de/
_______________________________________________ ghc-steering-committee mailing list ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org mailto:ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee
ghc-steering-committee mailing list ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee