
Dear Committee, after 2½ months, time for a new status updates. What was going on here? * Well, GHC2021 was going on. Lots of it. But it’s actually coming to a close in five days. It will be exciting to see how it affects the Haskell landscapes. * Heh, last status I wrote: Richard refines the bylaws in #360. Maybe everybody has a second look now and then we can merge this? I guess that still applies. Richard and I are discussing a corner case on the PR, but otherwise approvals are coming in, and unless that changes, we’ll merge that once we ironed out that wrinkle. * Simon introduced the position of a nudger, namely Tom. Tom, below are some PRs where you might need to nudge someone! * we were asked to review these proposals: #366: DuplicateRecordFields without ambiguous field access, shepherd: Tom #242: Unsaturated type families, Shepherd: Richard Eisenberg #370: Syntax for Modifiers, Shepherd: Alejandro #387: The Char kind, Shepherd: Alejandro #368: Warn on prefix/suffix operators, Shepherd: Tom #381: Visible 'forall' in types of terms, Shepherd: Iavor * we have a recommendation from the shepherd about: #369: Add sumToTag# primop, (rec: accept) #366: DuplicateRecordFields without ambiguous field access (rec: accept) #381: Visible 'forall' in types of terms (rec: reject) #242: Unsaturated type families (rec: accept) #313: Delimited continuation primops (rec: accept) #370: Syntax for Modifiers (rec: accept) #387: The Char kind (rec: accept) * we have sent the following proposals back to revision #283: Local modules * we decided about the following proposals #366: DuplicateRecordFields without ambiguous field access (accept) #370: Syntax for Modifiers (accept) #242: Unsaturated type families (accept) In addition to the two meta-proposals (bylaws and GHC2021), we currently have to act on the following 7 proposals, up by 2! Some need some nudging. ## Waiting for committee decision #387: The Char kind, Shepherd: Alejandro Looks like it’ll be smoothly accepted, but it’s only a week old. Will maybe merge in a few days. #381: Visible 'forall' in types of terms, Shepherd: Iavor Recommendation was to reject, but discussion went into the more abstract “whither dependent Haskell”. But what does this mean for this proposal? #369: Add sumToTag# primop Essentially accepted, waiting for feedback from the author on final tweaks #313: Delimited continuation primops, Shepherd: Simon Marlow Mostly positive reception, but there was discussion. Simon, can this be accepted as it, or does it need more work/time/discussion? #302: \of, Shepherd: Cale No new discussion. Cale, what is the conclusion? ## Waiting for Shepherd action #367: Clarify primops using unboxed sums, Shepherd: Simon Marlow This is aging… we need a shepherd recommendation #368: Warn on prefix/suffix operators, Shepherd: Tom Tom, your turn Cheers, Joachim -- Joachim Breitner mail@joachim-breitner.de http://www.joachim-breitner.de/

| In addition to the two meta-proposals (bylaws and GHC2021), we currently
| have to act on the following 7 proposals, up by 2!
| Some need some nudging.
Tom, I think you offered to be our nudger. Do you need nudging 😊?
Simon
| -----Original Message-----
| From: ghc-steering-committee

Apparently so! Apologies for falling behind; I haven’t got into the swing of 2021 yet 😄 I will make sure to get caught up with everything today! Thanks, Tom
On 14 Jan 2021, at 16:27, Simon Peyton Jones via ghc-steering-committee
wrote: | In addition to the two meta-proposals (bylaws and GHC2021), we currently | have to act on the following 7 proposals, up by 2! | Some need some nudging.
Tom, I think you offered to be our nudger. Do you need nudging 😊?
Simon
| -----Original Message----- | From: ghc-steering-committee
| On Behalf Of Joachim Breitner | Sent: 13 January 2021 22:14 | To: ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org | Subject: [ghc-steering-committee] Status | | Dear Committee, | | after 2½ months, time for a new status updates. What was going on here? | | * Well, GHC2021 was going on. Lots of it. But it’s actually coming to a | close | in five days. It will be exciting to see how it affects the Haskell | landscapes. | | * Heh, last status I wrote: | | Richard refines the bylaws in #360. Maybe everybody has a second | look now and then we can merge this? | | I guess that still applies. Richard and I are discussing a corner case | on the PR, but otherwise approvals are coming in, and unless that | changes, | we’ll merge that once we ironed out that wrinkle. | | * Simon introduced the position of a nudger, namely Tom. | | Tom, below are some PRs where you might need to nudge someone! | | * we were asked to review these proposals: | #366: DuplicateRecordFields without ambiguous field access, shepherd: | Tom | #242: Unsaturated type families, Shepherd: Richard Eisenberg | #370: Syntax for Modifiers, Shepherd: Alejandro | #387: The Char kind, Shepherd: Alejandro | #368: Warn on prefix/suffix operators, Shepherd: Tom | #381: Visible 'forall' in types of terms, Shepherd: Iavor | | * we have a recommendation from the shepherd about: | #369: Add sumToTag# primop, (rec: accept) | #366: DuplicateRecordFields without ambiguous field access (rec: | accept) | #381: Visible 'forall' in types of terms (rec: reject) | #242: Unsaturated type families (rec: accept) | #313: Delimited continuation primops (rec: accept) | #370: Syntax for Modifiers (rec: accept) | #387: The Char kind (rec: accept) | | * we have sent the following proposals back to revision | #283: Local modules | | * we decided about the following proposals | #366: DuplicateRecordFields without ambiguous field access (accept) | #370: Syntax for Modifiers (accept) | #242: Unsaturated type families (accept) | | In addition to the two meta-proposals (bylaws and GHC2021), we currently | have to act on the following 7 proposals, up by 2! | Some need some nudging. | | ## Waiting for committee decision | | #387: The Char kind, Shepherd: Alejandro | Looks like it’ll be smoothly accepted, but it’s only a week old. | Will maybe merge in a few days. | | #381: Visible 'forall' in types of terms, Shepherd: Iavor | Recommendation was to reject, but discussion went into the more | abstract “whither dependent Haskell”. But what does this mean | for this proposal? | | #369: Add sumToTag# primop | Essentially accepted, waiting for feedback from the author on final | tweaks | | #313: Delimited continuation primops, Shepherd: Simon Marlow | Mostly positive reception, but there was discussion. | Simon, can this be accepted as it, or does it need more | work/time/discussion? | | #302: \of, Shepherd: Cale | No new discussion. Cale, what is the conclusion? | | | ## Waiting for Shepherd action | | #367: Clarify primops using unboxed sums, Shepherd: Simon Marlow | This is aging… we need a shepherd recommendation | | #368: Warn on prefix/suffix operators, Shepherd: Tom | Tom, your turn | | Cheers, | Joachim | -- | Joachim Breitner | mail@joachim-breitner.de | | https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.joach | im- | breitner.de%2F&data=04%7C01%7Csimonpj%40microsoft.com%7Cf129a6d1884e49 | 46c9a308d8b8109e51%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C6374617288 | 40678377%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBT | iI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=6kMsahaFt6ayhXgbN11R7c5cATDzN9X | iqLJg0Mo5saE%3D&reserved=0 | | | _______________________________________________ | ghc-steering-committee mailing list | ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org | https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmail.has | kell.org%2Fcgi-bin%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fghc-steering- | committee&data=04%7C01%7Csimonpj%40microsoft.com%7Cf129a6d1884e4946c9a | 308d8b8109e51%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637461728840688 | 372%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik | 1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=TSiM7uiX06Ux3Gj98pUIbzNuebrnK6FMESmr | bMCpGio%3D&reserved=0 _______________________________________________ ghc-steering-committee mailing list ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee

On Wed, 13 Jan 2021 at 22:14, Joachim Breitner
#313: Delimited continuation primops, Shepherd: Simon Marlow Mostly positive reception, but there was discussion. Simon, can this be accepted as it, or does it need more work/time/discussion?
Let's accept. Cheers Simon
https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee
participants (4)
-
Joachim Breitner
-
Simon Marlow
-
Simon Peyton Jones
-
Tom Harding