Please review #283: Local modules, Shepherd: Arnaud

Dear Committee, this is your secretary speaking: Local Modules has been proposed by Richard https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/283 https://github.com/goldfirere/ghc-proposals/blob/local-modules/proposals/000... I’ll propose Arnaud as the shepherd. Please note that Richard writes
The main alternative to this proposal is #295. It is probably worth
it for at least the committee shepherd to read #295 in concert with this current proposal, to see which approach they like more.
Please guide us to a conclusion as outlined in https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals#committee-process Thanks, Joachim -- Joachim Breitner mail@joachim-breitner.de http://www.joachim-breitner.de/

On Oct 1, 2020, at 4:58 AM, Joachim Breitner
wrote: The main alternative to this proposal is #295. It is probably worth
it for at least the committee shepherd to read #295 in concert with this current proposal, to see which approach they like more.
Since I wrote that on #283, Michael (the author of #295) effectively retracted that proposal, so it needn't be considered in tandem. For the sake of completeness: a comment (https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/295#issuecomment-7020445... https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/295#issuecomment-7020445...) on #295 suggests a (in my opinion) very vague alternative approach building from #295 that could be considered an alternative to #283. Thanks, Richard
participants (2)
-
Joachim Breitner
-
Richard Eisenberg