This seems like a good candidate for the "needs revision" label. On Wed, Sep 4, 2019, at 12:41, Simon Peyton Jones via ghc-steering-committee wrote:

I discussed with Richard and put it back into discussion state.

Is there a label for "under discussion" or is that indicated by the /absence/ of a label?

S

| -----Original Message----- | From: ghc-steering-committee | On Behalf Of Joachim Breitner | Sent: 07 August 2019 22:03 | To: ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org | Subject: [ghc-steering-committee] Please review #233: Higher-order roles, | Shepherd: Simon PJ | | Dear Committee, | | this is your secretary speaking: | | Higher-order Roles | has been proposed by Richard | https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/233 | https://github.com/goldfirere/ghc-proposals/blob/higher- | roles/proposals/0000-higher-roles.rst | | I propose Simon PJ as the shepherd, as he already has had a discussion | with Richard on this. | | Please reach consensus as described in | https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals#committee-process | In particular, talk to the authors before, if you think this should be | rejected, and kick off the discussion on Github, following the steps | described under “Now the shepherd proposes to accept or reject the | proposal” in the above link. | | Thanks, | Joachim | -- | Joachim Breitner | mail@joachim-breitner.de | http://www.joachim-breitner.de/

_______________________________________________ ghc-steering-committee mailing list ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee

There is a “needs review” label, but in general absence of labels is “under discussion”. (Why? Because non-members cannot set labels and we want new proposals to have that status) Cheers, Joachim Am 4. September 2019 18:41:38 MESZ schrieb Simon Peyton Jones :

I discussed with Richard and put it back into discussion state.

Is there a label for "under discussion" or is that indicated by the /absence/ of a label?

S

| -----Original Message----- | From: ghc-steering-committee | On Behalf Of Joachim Breitner | Sent: 07 August 2019 22:03 | To: ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org | Subject: [ghc-steering-committee] Please review #233: Higher-order roles, | Shepherd: Simon PJ | | Dear Committee, | | this is your secretary speaking: | | Higher-order Roles | has been proposed by Richard | https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/233 | https://github.com/goldfirere/ghc-proposals/blob/higher- | roles/proposals/0000-higher-roles.rst | | I propose Simon PJ as the shepherd, as he already has had a discussion | with Richard on this. | | Please reach consensus as described in | https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals#committee-process | In particular, talk to the authors before, if you think this should be | rejected, and kick off the discussion on Github, following the steps | described under “Now the shepherd proposes to accept or reject the | proposal” in the above link. | | Thanks, | Joachim | -- | Joachim Breitner | mail@joachim-breitner.de | http://www.joachim-breitner.de/