Please review #281: Visible 'forall' in types of terms

Hello, Proposal #281 is ready for review by the committee. My recommendation is to accept it, I've written a summary of my understanding to the proposal and my recommendation on the GitHub thread, accessible through these links: https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/281 https://github.com/int-index/ghc-proposals/blob/visible-forall/proposals/000... Let the discussion begin! -Iavor

I'm in support of this proposal, but I've pushed back on a few softer points. I've commented on GitHub. Richard
On Oct 1, 2020, at 1:07 PM, Iavor Diatchki
wrote: Hello,
Proposal #281 is ready for review by the committee. My recommendation is to accept it, I've written a summary of my understanding to the proposal and my recommendation on the GitHub thread, accessible through these links:
https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/281 https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/281 https://github.com/int-index/ghc-proposals/blob/visible-forall/proposals/000... https://github.com/int-index/ghc-proposals/blob/visible-forall/proposals/000...
Let the discussion begin!
-Iavor _______________________________________________ ghc-steering-committee mailing list ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee
participants (2)
-
Iavor Diatchki
-
Richard Eisenberg