Hi, off the floor at the Haskell Symposium, the current status. I think many of us are here in Oxford. I guess we could try to meet in person and work off the backlog simply by quick real-live discussion – but maybe people have better things to do, and not all of us are here. So let’s just carry on as usual. Since the last status update one new proposals has come up for deliberation, and one proposals was accepted. Open at the moment are: NOUNPACK on function arguments https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/46 Shepherd: Simon Marlow Status: There was more discussion on GitHub, and @treeowl will have a look if the proposal text is reflecting all that discussion. (Still waiting on @treeowl.) Lazy unboxed tuples https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/35 Shepherd: Ryan Newton Status: Still waiting for Ryan to make a recommendation. Explicit foralls proposal https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/55 Shepherd: Simon Peyton Jones Status: Simon recommended to accept this, and we see silent consensus emerging. Mutable constructor fields https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/8 Shepherd: Ryan Newton Status: Waiting for Ryan to make a recommendation. Or Patterns https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/43 Shepherd: Manuel Chakravarty Status: Waiting for Manuel to make a recommendation. Type fixity https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/65 Shepherd: Joachim Breitner Status: Rejection recommended, but met with different opinions here. We need to either continue debating or *gasp* actually vote. Besides these, there are some proposals actively under discussion. You can always check them out at https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pulls?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Apr+no%... Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim Breitner mail@joachim-breitner.de http://www.joachim-breitner.de/