Steering Committee bylaws
Hi all, Some time ago, I posted https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/360 <https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/360>, an attempt at crafting bylaws for this committee. Conversation has died down, and so I'd like to have a discussion that will lead to amendments and then eventual acceptance (of something). I think it's best for this discussion to be right on the PR, not this thread. However, given that this PR is all about how we function, as a committee, I would like to see participation (ideally, agreement!) from everyone here before proceeding, even if it's just a LGTM. Thanks! Richard
LGTM. El mar., 29 sept. 2020 a las 17:01, Richard Eisenberg (<rae@richarde.dev>) escribió:
Hi all,
Some time ago, I posted https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/360, an attempt at crafting bylaws for this committee. Conversation has died down, and so I'd like to have a discussion that will lead to amendments and then eventual acceptance (of something).
I think it's best for this discussion to be right on the PR, not this thread. However, given that this PR is all about how we function, as a committee, I would like to see participation (ideally, agreement!) from everyone here before proceeding, even if it's just a LGTM.
Thanks! Richard _______________________________________________ ghc-steering-committee mailing list ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee
It looks like a good draft to me; doubtless may get refined in the light of experience. Simon From: ghc-steering-committee <ghc-steering-committee-bounces@haskell.org> On Behalf Of Richard Eisenberg Sent: 29 September 2020 16:01 To: Simon Peyton Jones via ghc-steering-committee <ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org> Subject: [ghc-steering-committee] Steering Committee bylaws Hi all, Some time ago, I posted https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/360<https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fghc-proposals%2Fghc-proposals%2Fpull%2F360&data=02%7C01%7Csimonpj%40microsoft.com%7Cf9610b49f9044d06b79808d864887eb9%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637369885297700231&sdata=XrWJuBKFKxQA%2B2UthwqeaW9ur7T56e01BW%2FzU%2FiGFiE%3D&reserved=0>, an attempt at crafting bylaws for this committee. Conversation has died down, and so I'd like to have a discussion that will lead to amendments and then eventual acceptance (of something). I think it's best for this discussion to be right on the PR, not this thread. However, given that this PR is all about how we function, as a committee, I would like to see participation (ideally, agreement!) from everyone here before proceeding, even if it's just a LGTM. Thanks! Richard
Dear Committee, after some refinement by some of you on the PR (thanks!), Richard would like us to vote on the bylaws. Please review https://github.com/goldfirere/ghc-proposals/blob/bylaws/committee.rst and also the other changes of https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/360/files The maybe most prominent change is the introduction of term limits of 3 years for all who are not Simon. This means that Richard, Iavor and me would, upon acceptance of this proposal, drop out, causing the size of the committee to drop below 9, thus triggering a call for nominations, for which we’d be eligible to re-nominiate ourself. Please have a closer look again, so that we have ironed out all wrinkles, and then very soon can vote about these bylaws. Cheers, Joachim Am Dienstag, den 29.09.2020, 15:00 +0000 schrieb Richard Eisenberg:
Hi all,
Some time ago, I posted https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/360, an attempt at crafting bylaws for this committee. Conversation has died down, and so I'd like to have a discussion that will lead to amendments and then eventual acceptance (of something).
I think it's best for this discussion to be right on the PR, not this thread. However, given that this PR is all about how we function, as a committee, I would like to see participation (ideally, agreement!) from everyone here before proceeding, even if it's just a LGTM.
Thanks! Richard _______________________________________________ ghc-steering-committee mailing list ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee -- Joachim Breitner mail@joachim-breitner.de http://www.joachim-breitner.de/
Looks good to me. Simon | -----Original Message----- | From: ghc-steering-committee <ghc-steering-committee- | bounces@haskell.org> On Behalf Of Joachim Breitner | Sent: 09 January 2021 16:39 | To: ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org | Subject: Re: [ghc-steering-committee] Steering Committee bylaws | | Dear Committee, | | after some refinement by some of you on the PR (thanks!), Richard | would like us to vote on the bylaws. | | Please review | https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgith | ub.com%2Fgoldfirere%2Fghc- | proposals%2Fblob%2Fbylaws%2Fcommittee.rst&data=04%7C01%7Csimonpj%4 | 0microsoft.com%7Cc7976ebaf92f4bc62d9008d8b4bd262d%7C72f988bf86f141af91 | ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637458071801222189%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8ey | JWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C100 | 0&sdata=1YoczhR7qbaqaW28XNkRWxUnio1oJcN4MuVpgl81Cs8%3D&reserve | d=0 | and also the other changes of | https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgith | ub.com%2Fghc-proposals%2Fghc- | proposals%2Fpull%2F360%2Ffiles&data=04%7C01%7Csimonpj%40microsoft. | com%7Cc7976ebaf92f4bc62d9008d8b4bd262d%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011d | b47%7C1%7C0%7C637458071801222189%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wL | jAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata | =NsTt6l9M%2BSud15VKLd6%2Fgr1NfdQGEH3WSO7re7jLBhY%3D&reserved=0 | | The maybe most prominent change is the introduction of term limits of | 3 years for all who are not Simon. This means that Richard, Iavor and | me would, upon acceptance of this proposal, drop out, causing the size | of the committee to drop below 9, thus triggering a call for | nominations, for which we'd be eligible to re-nominiate ourself. | | Please have a closer look again, so that we have ironed out all | wrinkles, and then very soon can vote about these bylaws. | | Cheers, | Joachim | | | Am Dienstag, den 29.09.2020, 15:00 +0000 schrieb Richard Eisenberg: | > Hi all, | > | > Some time ago, I posted | https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgith | ub.com%2Fghc-proposals%2Fghc- | proposals%2Fpull%2F360&data=04%7C01%7Csimonpj%40microsoft.com%7Cc7 | 976ebaf92f4bc62d9008d8b4bd262d%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1% | 7C0%7C637458071801232188%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiL | CJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=VcVhRYa | UjUWMCUivWnreRgUWaHJ3BrYnJ23yXgweJaI%3D&reserved=0, an attempt at | crafting bylaws for this committee. Conversation has died down, and so | I'd like to have a discussion that will lead to amendments and then | eventual acceptance (of something). | > | > I think it's best for this discussion to be right on the PR, not | this thread. However, given that this PR is all about how we function, | as a committee, I would like to see participation (ideally, | agreement!) from everyone here before proceeding, even if it's just a | LGTM. | > | > Thanks! | > Richard | > _______________________________________________ | > ghc-steering-committee mailing list | > ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org | > | https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmail | > .haskell.org%2Fcgi-bin%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fghc-steering- | committee&a | > | mp;data=04%7C01%7Csimonpj%40microsoft.com%7Cc7976ebaf92f4bc62d9008d8b4 | > | bd262d%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637458071801232188 | > | %7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6I | > | k1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=xTTLS2XKB%2BeQVN9XITgRnLrLoD4xJ | > kA52TWl0NJq2C4%3D&reserved=0 | -- | Joachim Breitner | mail@joachim-breitner.de | | https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.j | oachim- | breitner.de%2F&data=04%7C01%7Csimonpj%40microsoft.com%7Cc7976ebaf9 | 2f4bc62d9008d8b4bd262d%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C63 | 7458071801232188%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV | 2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=4xye%2BQxiMZ5bG | RvhJ9IFd2fQwVn%2B91FP1MYeDiW2Y%2BE%3D&reserved=0 | | | _______________________________________________ | ghc-steering-committee mailing list | ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org | https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmail | .haskell.org%2Fcgi-bin%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fghc-steering- | committee&data=04%7C01%7Csimonpj%40microsoft.com%7Cc7976ebaf92f4bc | 62d9008d8b4bd262d%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C6374580 | 71801232188%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMz | IiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=xTTLS2XKB%2BeQVN9XIT | gRnLrLoD4xJkA52TWl0NJq2C4%3D&reserved=0
LGTM too. Thanks Richard! On Sat, 9 Jan 2021 at 16:39, Joachim Breitner <mail@joachim-breitner.de> wrote:
Dear Committee,
after some refinement by some of you on the PR (thanks!), Richard would like us to vote on the bylaws.
Please review https://github.com/goldfirere/ghc-proposals/blob/bylaws/committee.rst and also the other changes of https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/360/files
The maybe most prominent change is the introduction of term limits of 3 years for all who are not Simon. This means that Richard, Iavor and me would, upon acceptance of this proposal, drop out, causing the size of the committee to drop below 9, thus triggering a call for nominations, for which we’d be eligible to re-nominiate ourself.
Please have a closer look again, so that we have ironed out all wrinkles, and then very soon can vote about these bylaws.
Cheers, Joachim
Am Dienstag, den 29.09.2020, 15:00 +0000 schrieb Richard Eisenberg:
Hi all,
Some time ago, I posted https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/360, an attempt at crafting bylaws for this committee. Conversation has died down, and so I'd like to have a discussion that will lead to amendments and then eventual acceptance (of something).
I think it's best for this discussion to be right on the PR, not this thread. However, given that this PR is all about how we function, as a committee, I would like to see participation (ideally, agreement!) from everyone here before proceeding, even if it's just a LGTM.
Thanks! Richard _______________________________________________ ghc-steering-committee mailing list ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee -- Joachim Breitner mail@joachim-breitner.de http://www.joachim-breitner.de/
_______________________________________________ ghc-steering-committee mailing list ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee
Hi, I think we have sufficient LGTMs now, will merge. Cheers, Joachim Am Montag, den 18.01.2021, 15:06 +0000 schrieb Simon Marlow:
LGTM too. Thanks Richard!
On Sat, 9 Jan 2021 at 16:39, Joachim Breitner <mail@joachim-breitner.de> wrote:
Dear Committee,
after some refinement by some of you on the PR (thanks!), Richard would like us to vote on the bylaws.
Please review https://github.com/goldfirere/ghc-proposals/blob/bylaws/committee.rst and also the other changes of https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/360/files
The maybe most prominent change is the introduction of term limits of 3 years for all who are not Simon. This means that Richard, Iavor and me would, upon acceptance of this proposal, drop out, causing the size of the committee to drop below 9, thus triggering a call for nominations, for which we’d be eligible to re-nominiate ourself.
Please have a closer look again, so that we have ironed out all wrinkles, and then very soon can vote about these bylaws.
Cheers, Joachim
Am Dienstag, den 29.09.2020, 15:00 +0000 schrieb Richard Eisenberg:
Hi all,
Some time ago, I posted https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/360, an attempt at crafting bylaws for this committee. Conversation has died down, and so I'd like to have a discussion that will lead to amendments and then eventual acceptance (of something).
I think it's best for this discussion to be right on the PR, not this thread. However, given that this PR is all about how we function, as a committee, I would like to see participation (ideally, agreement!) from everyone here before proceeding, even if it's just a LGTM.
Thanks! Richard _______________________________________________ ghc-steering-committee mailing list ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee
ghc-steering-committee mailing list ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee -- Joachim Breitner mail@joachim-breitner.de http://www.joachim-breitner.de/
LGTM On Tue, 29 Sept 2020 at 11:01, Richard Eisenberg <rae@richarde.dev> wrote:
Hi all,
Some time ago, I posted https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/360, an attempt at crafting bylaws for this committee. Conversation has died down, and so I'd like to have a discussion that will lead to amendments and then eventual acceptance (of something).
I think it's best for this discussion to be right on the PR, not this thread. However, given that this PR is all about how we function, as a committee, I would like to see participation (ideally, agreement!) from everyone here before proceeding, even if it's just a LGTM.
Thanks! Richard _______________________________________________ ghc-steering-committee mailing list ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee
Am Dienstag, den 29.09.2020, 15:00 +0000 schrieb Richard Eisenberg:
However, given that this PR is all about how we function, as a committee, I would like to see participation (ideally, agreement!) from everyone here before proceeding, even if it's just a LGTM.
LGTM Cheers, Joachim -- Joachim Breitner mail@joachim-breitner.de http://www.joachim-breitner.de/
Same here. On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 10:37 AM Joachim Breitner <mail@joachim-breitner.de> wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 29.09.2020, 15:00 +0000 schrieb Richard Eisenberg:
However, given that this PR is all about how we function, as a committee, I would like to see participation (ideally, agreement!) from everyone here before proceeding, even if it's just a LGTM.
LGTM
Cheers, Joachim -- Joachim Breitner mail@joachim-breitner.de http://www.joachim-breitner.de/
_______________________________________________ ghc-steering-committee mailing list ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee
+1! On 15 Jan 2021, at 14:11, Spiwack, Arnaud <arnaud.spiwack@tweag.io<mailto:arnaud.spiwack@tweag.io>> wrote: Same here. On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 10:37 AM Joachim Breitner <mail@joachim-breitner.de<mailto:mail@joachim-breitner.de>> wrote: Am Dienstag, den 29.09.2020, 15:00 +0000 schrieb Richard Eisenberg:
However, given that this PR is all about how we function, as a committee, I would like to see participation (ideally, agreement!) from everyone here before proceeding, even if it's just a LGTM.
LGTM Cheers, Joachim -- Joachim Breitner mail@joachim-breitner.de<mailto:mail@joachim-breitner.de> http://www.joachim-breitner.de/ _______________________________________________ ghc-steering-committee mailing list ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org<mailto:ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org> https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee _______________________________________________ ghc-steering-committee mailing list ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org<mailto:ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org> https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee
participants (8)
-
Alejandro Serrano Mena -
Cale Gibbard -
Joachim Breitner -
Richard Eisenberg -
Simon Marlow -
Simon Peyton Jones -
Spiwack, Arnaud -
Tom Harding