
Dear GHC Steering Committee Dmitrii makes a good point about GHC in this blog post. To discuss. Simon * Be a goalkeeperhttps://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fnews.us10.list-manage.com%2Ftrack%2Fclick%3Fu%3D49a6a2e17b12be2c5c4dcb232%26id%3D4f39ccf06b%26e%3Df74e57acee&data=02%7C01%7Csimonpj%40microsoft.com%7Cd9841d6e24be47aea9c308d8559259dc%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637353434346685776&sdata=d4w9i%2Fqh0a%2F1qIDMgEuyDELOcT02qgN7Gh2S84rQedA%3D&reserved=0 by Dmitrii Kovanikov You may find this blog post useful, if you are interested in maintaining any project for a long time and keep your sanity during this process.

I actually feel like something Haskell has always done very well is balance the concerns of people with different goals and motivations. [...]
Dear all,
I've read the post, and the discussion it spawned on Reddit. I agree with a
lot with the following comment there
https://www.reddit.com/r/haskell/comments/iopcx3/blog_post_be_a_goalkeeper_what_are_the_haskell/g4fvj7d?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3
through its lifetime of serving as an academic research project AND an
educational tool used in freshman programming classes AND and a stable
language for production work
I have the feeling that people think that GHC is less rounded that it is
due to the myriad of extensions one needs to enable to bring some
functionality in (MultiParamTypeClasses + FlexibleInstances +
FlexibleContexts come to mind for any class-based programming). This is one
of the reasons I wanted to push the new GHC2020 "standard".
Alejandro
El jue., 10 sept. 2020 a las 18:01, Simon Peyton Jones via
ghc-steering-committee (
Dear GHC Steering Committee
Dmitrii makes a good point about GHC in this blog post. To discuss.
Simon
You may find this blog post useful, if you are interested in maintaining any project for a long time and keep your sanity during this process.
_______________________________________________ ghc-steering-committee mailing list ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee

On Sep 11, 2020, at 4:47 AM, Alejandro Serrano Mena
wrote: I have the feeling that people think that GHC is less rounded that it is due to the myriad of extensions one needs to enable to bring some functionality in (MultiParamTypeClasses + FlexibleInstances + FlexibleContexts come to mind for any class-based programming). This is one of the reasons I wanted to push the new GHC2020 "standard".
I agree. A frequent comment at events is that Haskell is just too complicated. But I think what the speakers often mean is that there are too many extensions. I've asked what people mean, and I never have felt I've gotten a more satisfactory answre than that. Happily, it's a relatively easy problem to fix! That said, I do think writing out some goals would be a useful exercise. Richard
participants (3)
-
Alejandro Serrano Mena
-
Richard Eisenberg
-
Simon Peyton Jones