Hi, I didn't send out an e-mail about the TypeInType proposal yet, as I was travelling around the holidays, and I figured other folks might be also. I'll send out something to kick off the discussion pretty soon. Sorry for the delay. -Iavor On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 1:07 PM Joachim Breitner wrote:

Hi,

you know that I like slim smooth processes with not too many rules, and our current process worked pretty nicely for the first few proposals. But now it seems that we lost some steam, and a fair number of proposals are stuck waiting for their Shepherd to make progress.

Does this mean that people simply need deadlines for work to be done?

Do you want deadlines?

Also, I am happy to re-assign some stalled proposals to new shepherds. Does anyone want to volunteer recommending a decision for one or more of these proposals:

Lazy unboxed tuples https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/35

Mutable constructor fields https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/8

Deprecate STM invariant mechanism https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/77

-Wall to include incomplete-uni-patterns and incomplete-record-updates https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/71

Thanks, Joachim

-- Joachim Breitner mail@joachim-breitner.de http://www.joachim-breitner.de/ _______________________________________________ ghc-steering-committee mailing list ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee

Just sent an email about the -Wall proposal. Thanks for the reminder! On 5 January 2018 at 21:06, Joachim Breitner wrote:

Hi,

you know that I like slim smooth processes with not too many rules, and our current process worked pretty nicely for the first few proposals. But now it seems that we lost some steam, and a fair number of proposals are stuck waiting for their Shepherd to make progress.

Does this mean that people simply need deadlines for work to be done?

Do you want deadlines?

Also, I am happy to re-assign some stalled proposals to new shepherds. Does anyone want to volunteer recommending a decision for one or more of these proposals:

Lazy unboxed tuples https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/35

Mutable constructor fields https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/8

Deprecate STM invariant mechanism https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/77

-Wall to include incomplete-uni-patterns and incomplete-record-updates https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/71

Thanks, Joachim

-- Joachim Breitner mail@joachim-breitner.de http://www.joachim-breitner.de/

_______________________________________________ ghc-steering-committee mailing list ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee