April 2014 - ghc-tickets

[GHC] #8903: Add dead store elimination
by GHC 18 Jul '17

18 Jul '17

#8903: Add dead store elimination ------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: tibbe | Owner: Type: feature request | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: Compiler | Version: 7.9 Keywords: | Operating System: Unknown/Multiple Architecture: Unknown/Multiple | Type of failure: None/Unknown Difficulty: Unknown | Test Case: Blocked By: | Blocking: Related Tickets: | ------------------------------------+------------------------------------- We could use some dead store elimination in the code generator. Here's some Cmm that has redundant stores to the same locations: {{{ // thawArray#: I64[Hp - 168] = I64[PicBaseReg + stg_MUT_ARR_PTRS_DIRTY_info@GOTPCREL]; I64[Hp - 160] = 16; I64[Hp - 152] = 17; _c2nT::I64 = Hp - 168; call MO_Memcpy(_c2nT::I64 + 24, _s2cx::P64 + 24, 128, 8); // writeArray#: P64[(_c2nT::I64 + 24) + (_s2cy::I64 << 3)] = _s2cE::P64; I64[_c2nT::I64] = I64[PicBaseReg + stg_MUT_ARR_PTRS_DIRTY_info@GOTPCREL]; I8[(_c2nT::I64 + 24) + ((I64[_c2nT::I64 + 8] << 3) + (_s2cy::I64 >> 7))] = 1 :: W8; // unsafeFreeze# I64[_c2nT::I64] = I64[PicBaseReg + stg_MUT_ARR_PTRS_FROZEN0_info@GOTPCREL]; }}} There are three stores to the same location (`I64[_c2nT::I64]`). (There's also one much less obvious double store to another location, which will probably be much harder to address: the store to `P64[(_c2nT::I64 + 24) + (_s2cy::I64 << 3)]` overwrites a word previous written by the `MO_Memcpy`. Getting to that one will be hard as the memcoy callish !MachOp only gets expanded in the backend.) -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/8903> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 4

[GHC] #8346: Rank 1 type signature still requires RankNTypes
by GHC 11 Jul '17

11 Jul '17

#8346: Rank 1 type signature still requires RankNTypes ----------------------------+---------------------------------------------- Reporter: | Owner: tinctorius | Status: new Type: bug | Milestone: Priority: normal | Version: 7.6.3 Component: Compiler | Operating System: Unknown/Multiple Keywords: | Type of failure: GHC rejects valid program Architecture: | Test Case: Unknown/Multiple | Blocking: Difficulty: Unknown | Blocked By: | Related Tickets: #2605 | ----------------------------+---------------------------------------------- When trying to figure out which type variable names are *actually* bound in `ScopedTypeVariables`, I tried floating `forall`s into the covariant argument of the function type. Essentially, I ran into the problem that programs like the following are rejected: {{{ #!hs {-# LANGUAGE ExplicitForAll #-} tuple :: forall a. a -> (forall b. b -> (a, b)) tuple = (,) }}} The message is as follows: {{{ Main.hs:2:10: Illegal polymorphic or qualified type: forall b. b -> (a, b) Perhaps you intended to use -XRankNTypes or -XRank2Types In the type signature for `tuple': tuple :: forall a. a -> (forall b. b -> (a, b)) }}} As far as I know, the rank of a type is defined by how deep quantifiers are nested in contravariant parts of that type. Or something like that. Also, as far as I know, `forall a. a -> (forall b. b -> (a, b))` is equivalent to `forall a b. a -> b -> (a, b)`, and more importantly, both are rank-1 polymorphic. There should be no need to use extensions that allow higher-ranked polymorphism. -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/8346> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 4

[GHC] #8697: Type rationals
by GHC 16 Jun '17

16 Jun '17

#8697: Type rationals ------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: MikeIzbicki | Owner: Type: feature request | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: Compiler | Version: 7.6.3 Keywords: | Operating System: Unknown/Multiple Architecture: Unknown/Multiple | Type of failure: None/Unknown Difficulty: Unknown | Test Case: Blocked By: | Blocking: Related Tickets: | ------------------------------------+------------------------------------- I've used GHC's Type Nats to implement my own type level rationals (code below). This works fine, but the syntax is a little funky because you have to write out the number as a fraction. For example, you must write 13/10 instead of 1.3; or even worse, 13/1 instead of 13. It would be nice to just write the decimal notation. I only see one potential problem with this feature: the dot in the decimal notation could interfere with the dot in forall statements. I guess this can be parsed unambiguously, but maybe not. {{{ data Frac = Frac Nat Nat data instance Sing (n::Frac) = SFrac Integer Integer instance (SingI a, SingI b) => SingI ('Frac a b) where sing = SFrac (fromSing (sing :: Sing a)) (fromSing (sing :: Sing b)) instance Fractional r => SingE (Kind :: Frac) r where fromSing (SFrac a b) = fromIntegral a/fromIntegral b type (/) a b = 'Frac a b }}} -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/8697> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 14

[GHC] #8703: Use guard pages rather than heap checks
by GHC 07 Jun '17

07 Jun '17

#8703: Use guard pages rather than heap checks ------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: schyler | Owner: simonmar Type: feature request | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: Runtime System | Version: Keywords: | Operating System: Unknown/Multiple Architecture: Unknown/Multiple | Type of failure: None/Unknown Difficulty: Unknown | Test Case: Blocked By: | Blocking: Related Tickets: | ------------------------------------+------------------------------------- By mmap'ing memory using MAP_ANONYMOUS (or /dev/zero) as PROT_NONE (Windows has an equivalent functionality with VirtualAlloc), it's possible to create a page that will fault when read or written to. It may be possible to remove the heap checks in the runtime, speeding up allocations, and instead expand the heap when a fault is raised. This is likely cheaper for large pages full of many small allocations than the cost of the heap checking branch. -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/8703> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 8

[GHC] #8905: Function arguments are always spilled/reloaded if scrutinee is already in WHNF
by GHC 26 May '17

26 May '17

#8905: Function arguments are always spilled/reloaded if scrutinee is already in WHNF ------------------------------+-------------------------------------------- Reporter: tibbe | Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: Compiler | Version: 7.9 Keywords: | Operating System: Unknown/Multiple Architecture: | Type of failure: Runtime performance bug Unknown/Multiple | Test Case: Difficulty: Unknown | Blocking: Blocked By: | Related Tickets: | ------------------------------+-------------------------------------------- The code generator unnecessarily spills and reloads function arguments if the scrutinee turns out to be already evaluated (i.e. has non-zero tag bits). Here's the beginning of a function body, taken from the `insert` function at https://github.com/tibbe/unordered- containers/blob/master/Data/HashMap/Base.hs#L303: {{{ c2wQ: // stack check if ((Sp + -72) < SpLim) goto c2wR; else goto c2wS; c2wR: // stack check failure R1 = PicBaseReg + $wpoly_go_closure; I64[Sp - 40] = R2; I64[Sp - 32] = R3; P64[Sp - 24] = R4; I64[Sp - 16] = R5; P64[Sp - 8] = R6; Sp = Sp - 40; call (I64[BaseReg - 8])(R1) args: 48, res: 0, upd: 8; c2wS: // stack check success I64[Sp - 40] = PicBaseReg + block_c2my_info; // return addr for eval R1 = R6; // t I64[Sp - 32] = R2; // spill: s I64[Sp - 24] = R3; // spill: x P64[Sp - 16] = R4; // spill: k I64[Sp - 8] = R5; // spill: h Sp = Sp - 40; if (R1 & 7 != 0) goto c2my; else goto c2mz; // eval check of t c2mz: // eval check failed call (I64[R1])(R1) returns to c2my, args: 8, res: 8, upd: 8; // eval c2my: // eval check succeeded _s2b1::I64 = I64[Sp + 8]; // reload: h _s2b2::I64 = I64[Sp + 16]; // reload: k _s2b3::P64 = P64[Sp + 24]; // reload: x _s2b4::I64 = I64[Sp + 32]; // reload: s switch [0 .. 4] (R1 & 7 - 1) { case 0 : goto c2wK; case 1 : goto c2wL; case 2 : goto c2wM; case 3 : goto c2wN; case 4 : goto c2wO; } }}} It seems to me that all the spills/reloads could be pushed into the `c2mz` block. The `c2my` block, in its current form, is reused for a heap check failure case, so the heap check most likely will have to do its own spilling/reloading. However, since the scrutinee not having tags bit or the eval checking failing is not the common case, they should be out of the common path. If it matters the data type is spine strict so GHC should have enough information to know that the common case (e.g. self-recursive calls) already have an evaluated argument (although there might be an indirection in some cases). -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/8905> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 17

[GHC] #8048: Register spilling produces ineffecient/highly contending code
by GHC 21 May '17

21 May '17

#8048: Register spilling produces ineffecient/highly contending code -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: schyler | Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: _|_ Component: Compiler | Version: 7.6.3 Keywords: register | Operating System: Unknown/Multiple allocator spill | Type of failure: Runtime Architecture: Unknown/Multiple | performance bug Difficulty: Unknown | Test Case: Blocked By: | Blocking: Related Tickets: | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- The native codegen and llvm both produce ineffecient code for functions using structures with many strict fields or unboxed values. Consider the following program: {{{ {-# LANGUAGE BangPatterns #-} module Spill where import GHC.Exts data S = S !Int !Int !Int !Int !Int !Int !Int !Int !Int spill :: S -> S -> S -> S spill (S !a !b !c !d !e !f !g !h !i) (S !j !k !l !m !n !o !p !q !r) (S !s !t !u !v !w !x !y !z _) = S (a + j + s) (b + c) (k + r) (a + b + c + d + e + f + g + h + i) (j + k + l + m + n + o + p + q + r) (s + t + u + v + w + x + y + z) (a + b + c) (j + k + l) (s + t + u) }}} Parts of the code produced for this (which is identical regardless of -funbox-strict-fields) looks like: {{{ _cnc: addq $80,%r12 cmpq 144(%r13),%r12 ja _cni movq $Spill.S_con_info,-72(%r12) movq 32(%rbp),%rax movq %rax,-64(%r12) movq 24(%rbp),%rax movq %rax,-56(%r12) movq 16(%rbp),%rax movq %rax,-48(%r12) movq 8(%rbp),%rax movq %rax,-40(%r12) movq 40(%rbp),%rax movq %rax,-32(%r12) movq 48(%rbp),%rax movq %rax,-24(%r12) movq 56(%rbp),%rax movq %rax,-16(%r12) movq 64(%rbp),%rax movq %rax,-8(%r12) movq 7(%rbx),%rax movq %rax,0(%r12) leaq -71(%r12),%rbx addq $72,%rbp jmp *0(%rbp) }}} {{{ _csv: movq 63(%rbx),%rax movq %rax,-56(%rbp) movq 55(%rbx),%rax movq %rax,-48(%rbp) movq 47(%rbx),%rax movq %rax,-40(%rbp) movq 39(%rbx),%rax movq %rax,-32(%rbp) movq 31(%rbx),%rax movq %rax,-24(%rbp) movq 23(%rbx),%rax movq %rax,-16(%rbp) movq 71(%rbx),%rax movq %rax,-8(%rbp) movq 15(%rbx),%rax movq %rax,0(%rbp) }}} And likewise for LLVM: {{{ .LBB10_1: # %coZ movq 7(%rbx), %rcx movq $Spill_S_con_info, 8(%rax) movq 8(%rbp), %rdx movq %rdx, 16(%rax) movq 16(%rbp), %rdx movq %rdx, 24(%rax) movq 24(%rbp), %rdx movq %rdx, 32(%rax) movq 32(%rbp), %rdx movq %rdx, 40(%rax) movq 40(%rbp), %rdx movq %rdx, 48(%rax) movq 48(%rbp), %rdx movq %rdx, 56(%rax) movq 56(%rbp), %rdx movq %rdx, 64(%rax) movq 64(%rbp), %rdx movq %rdx, 72(%rax) movq %rcx, (%r12) movq 72(%rbp), %rax leaq 72(%rbp), %rbp leaq -71(%r12), %rbx jmpq *%rax # TAILCALL }}} Quoting from #ghc "the [register allocator] core algo is '96 vintage". Improvements are needed; * Take into consideration pipelining and handle spills less dramatically, attempting to reduce register contention * Sink memory reads in order to reduce register pressure -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/8048> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 16

[GHC] #8721: Testsuite not reporting errors for DYN way on OS X
by GHC 18 May '17

18 May '17

#8721: Testsuite not reporting errors for DYN way on OS X ------------------------------------+---------------------------- Reporter: darchon | Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: Test Suite | Version: 7.6.3 Keywords: dynamic linking | Operating System: MacOS X Architecture: Unknown/Multiple | Type of failure: Other Difficulty: Unknown | Test Case: Blocked By: | Blocking: Related Tickets: | ------------------------------------+---------------------------- Using GHC 7.6.3, on OS X 10.8.5, for the program: `main = putStrLn "Hello World"`, compiling with `ghc --make -dynamic Main.hs`, I get: {{{ ~/Documents/devel/test$ ./Main dyld: Library not loaded: /usr/local/lib/ghc-7.6.3/base-4.6.0.1/libHSbase-4.6.0.1-ghc7.6.3.dylib Referenced from: /Users/christiaan/Documents/devel/test/./Main Reason: image not found Trace/BPT trap: 5 }}} The reason for this is that: * I installed GHC in: `/opt/ghc/7.6.3` instead of the default `/usr/local`. * GHC-bundled libraries get an OS X `install_name` with a prefix of `/usr/local/` instead of `/opt/ghc/7.6.3/`, meaning that the runtime linker will be looking in the wrong place. So, I wondered why this bug never showed in the testsuite and decided to test: {{{ /opt/ghc/7.6.3/src/ghc/testsuite (ghc-7.6)$ make WAY=dyn TEST=10queens … =====> 10queens(dyn) 1834 of 3403 [0, 0, 0] cd ./programs/10queens && '/opt/ghc/7.6.3/src/ghc/inplace/bin/ghc-stage2' -fforce-recomp -dcore-lint -dcmm-lint -dno-debug-output -no-user-package- db -rtsopts -fno-ghci-history --make -o 10queens Main -O -dynamic >10queens.comp.stderr 2>&1 cd ./programs/10queens && ./10queens </dev/null >10queens.run.stdout 2>10queens.run.stderr OVERALL SUMMARY for test run started at Fri Jan 31 09:42:45 CET 2014 3403 total tests, which gave rise to 13561 test cases, of which 0 caused framework failures 13560 were skipped 1 expected passes 0 had missing libraries 0 expected failures 0 unexpected passes 0 unexpected failures }}} However, when I run the `10queens` program myself: {{{ /opt/ghc/7.6.3/src/ghc/testsuite (ghc-7.6)$ tests/programs/10queens/10queens dyld: Library not loaded: /usr/local/lib/ghc-7.6.3.20130421/base-4.6.0.1/libHSbase-4.6.0.1-ghc7.6.3.20130421.dylib Referenced from: /opt/ghc/7.6.3/src/ghc/testsuite/tests/programs/10queens/10queens Reason: image not found Trace/BPT trap: 5 }}} I get a similar error as the one reported above. Due to commit f7be53ac9dac85b83e7fe5ecede01b98a572ba48, these errors will no longer show in GHC 7.8. However, I feel that the testsuite is now giving a false sense of security in terms of dynamic linking. Obviously dynamic linking was broken in 7.6, but the testsuite did not catch it! Sadly, this behaviour can now only be verified in the 7.6 branch, and not in 7.8 or HEAD. Hopefully somebody more knowledgeable of the testsuite can comment why dynamic linking worked when an executable was run "within" the testsuite, whilst being broken when run normally. -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/8721> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 6

[GHC] #8875: Track Exceptions
by GHC 09 May '17

09 May '17

#8875: Track Exceptions ----------------------------------------------+---------------------------- Reporter: yokto | Owner: Type: feature request | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: Compiler | Version: Keywords: | Operating System: Architecture: Unknown/Multiple | Unknown/Multiple Difficulty: Project (more than a week) | Type of failure: Blocked By: | None/Unknown Related Tickets: | Test Case: | Blocking: ----------------------------------------------+---------------------------- Figure out for each function which exceptions can be thrown by it. This could probably be done by tracking calls to {{{ throw }}} and {{{ catch }}} and their types. The info would probably need to be stored in the .hi files, and could then be displayed by haddock. -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/8875> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 4

[GHC] #8396: cleanup / refactor native code gens
by GHC 09 May '17

09 May '17

#8396: cleanup / refactor native code gens ----------------------------------------+---------------------------------- Reporter: carter | Owner: Type: feature request | Status: new Priority: high | Milestone: 7.10.1 Component: Compiler | Version: Keywords: | Operating System: Architecture: Unknown/Multiple | Unknown/Multiple Difficulty: Unknown | Type of failure: None/Unknown Blocked By: | Test Case: Related Tickets: #8299 , #8287 ,#8272 | Blocking: ----------------------------------------+---------------------------------- the native code gen could use some cleanup / love. 1. Catchup with feature parity of the llvm a. this includes adding SIMD support on applicable native code gen architectures, starting with x86_64 2. make it easier to extend / modify experiment with the native code gen 3. make it easier to add new primops (maybe even a magic inline asm primop?!) 4. other things i'm overlooking right now this also overlaps with a number of related tickets i've been adding to trac. a more ambitious strategic goal that won't be the initial goal, that simon marlow suggested when i chatted with him at ICFP, is to make the native code gen codebase a sort of "mini-llvm". I think thats a bit ambitious for the near term, but maybe thats the point on the horizon we may want to aim towards. -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/8396> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 7

[GHC] #8573: "evacuate: strange closure type 0" when creating large array
by GHC 09 May '17

09 May '17

#8573: "evacuate: strange closure type 0" when creating large array ----------------------------+---------------------------------- Reporter: nad | Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: Compiler | Version: 7.6.3 Keywords: | Operating System: Linux Architecture: x86 | Type of failure: Runtime crash Difficulty: Unknown | Test Case: Blocked By: | Blocking: Related Tickets: | ----------------------------+---------------------------------- Consider the following code: {{{ module Main where import Data.Array xs :: [Int] xs = [0 .. 64988] crash :: Int -> IO () crash m = array (0, m) [ (x, x) | x <- xs ] `seq` return () strangeClosureType = do print (sum xs) crash (maxBound - 1) segFault1 = crash (maxBound - 1) segFault2 = do print (sum xs) crash (maxBound - 2) }}} If I compile the program using `ghc --make Main.hs -O -main-is strangeClosureType`, then I get the following error message: {{{ Main: internal error: evacuate: strange closure type 0 (GHC version 7.6.3 for i386_unknown_linux) Please report this as a GHC bug: http://www.haskell.org/ghc/reportabug Aborted (core dumped) }}} If I don't use `-O`, or if I let `segFault1` or `segFault2` be `main`, then I get the following error message instead: {{{ Segmentation fault (core dumped) }}} If the number `30000` is replaced by some other number, then the strange closure error may be replaced by a segfault, or even no error at all. Perhaps this is another instance of bug #7762; I have only tested using GHC 7.6.3. I am using base 4.6.0.1 and array 0.4.0.1. -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/8573> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 5