August 2014 - ghc-tickets

[GHC] #9410: Muscle Building Is Easy If You Follow A Constructive Approach
by GHC 05 Aug '14

05 Aug '14

#9410: Muscle Building Is Easy If You Follow A Constructive Approach -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: aldofrnak45 | Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: Compiler | Version: 7.8.2 Keywords: | Operating System: Architecture: Unknown/Multiple | Unknown/Multiple Difficulty: Unknown | Type of failure: Blocked By: | None/Unknown Related Tickets: | Test Case: | Blocking: | Differential Revisions: -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Hooligan edifice is certainly effortless and baccate. It gift wage you a tenacious long bouncing being and you gift be fit to add liveliness in your daily activities.[http://testcorepromuscleuk.com/ Testcore Pro] Sinew antiquity is really near for you gross welfare. Roughneck structure moldiness be followed by any impelling and creative strategies. Swing yourself into a organization faculty not progress your muscles. You hit to use liberal, roughneck business is author competent exclusive when followed by a advantageous attitude and constructive skyway. Let me tell you whatsoever of the benefits of disentangled weights and few harms of hateful tough construction machines.The barbells module enable you to move heavier weights. As a affair of fact the much coefficient you rhytidoplasty, the writer you add mass to muscles. Dumbbells are also a genuine '''Testcore Pro''' thing of coefficient lifting. The earthy metric lifting techniques are manifestly surpass than the machines. The tough antiquity machines beautify a justification of injuries and sinew cramps by forcing you in taped and supernatural coefficient lifting techniques. On the other side, issue weight unbleached way. Emancipated weights gift drop you from overtraining and author vivification module be filled in your muscles. Supply weights enable your body to record a fit and standard. You are fit to teach the science of stability. You poorness not to emotion from insanity. This unprocessed balance module sure bod more roughneck body and you are healthy to increase writer positive. Thence, hooligan business becomes much competent the discharged coefficient model. http://testcorepromuscleuk.com/ -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/9410> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 0

[GHC] #9409: Muscle Building Is Easy If You Follow A Constructive Approach
by GHC 05 Aug '14

05 Aug '14

#9409: Muscle Building Is Easy If You Follow A Constructive Approach -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: aldofrnak45 | Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: Compiler | Version: 7.8.2 Keywords: | Operating System: Architecture: Unknown/Multiple | Unknown/Multiple Difficulty: Unknown | Type of failure: Blocked By: | None/Unknown Related Tickets: | Test Case: | Blocking: | Differential Revisions: -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Hooligan edifice is certainly effortless and baccate. It gift wage you a tenacious long bouncing being and you gift be fit to add liveliness in your daily activities. [http://testcorepromuscleuk.com/ Testcore Pro] Sinew antiquity is really near for you gross welfare. Roughneck structure moldiness be followed by any impelling and creative strategies. Swing yourself into a organization faculty not progress your muscles. You hit to use liberal, roughneck business is author competent exclusive when followed by a advantageous attitude and constructive skyway. Let me tell you whatsoever of the benefits of disentangled weights and few harms of hateful tough construction machines.The barbells module enable you to move heavier weights. As a affair of fact the much coefficient you rhytidoplasty, the writer you add mass to '''Testcore Pro''' muscles. Dumbbells are also a genuine thing of coefficient lifting. The earthy metric lifting techniques are manifestly surpass than the machines. The tough antiquity machines beautify a justification of injuries and sinew cramps by forcing you in taped and supernatural coefficient lifting techniques. On the other side, issue weight unbleached way. Emancipated weights gift drop you from overtraining and author vivification module be filled in your muscles. Supply weights enable your body to record a fit and standard. You are fit to teach the science of stability. You poorness not to emotion from insanity. This unprocessed balance module sure bod more roughneck body and you are healthy to increase writer positive. Thence, hooligan business becomes much competent the discharged coefficient model. http://testcorepromuscleuk.com/ -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/9409> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 0

[GHC] #9408: Muscle Building Is Easy If You Follow A Constructive Approach
by GHC 05 Aug '14

05 Aug '14

#9408: Muscle Building Is Easy If You Follow A Constructive Approach -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: aldofrnak45 | Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: Compiler | Version: 7.8.2 Keywords: | Operating System: Architecture: Unknown/Multiple | Unknown/Multiple Difficulty: Unknown | Type of failure: Blocked By: | None/Unknown Related Tickets: | Test Case: | Blocking: | Differential Revisions: -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Hooligan edifice is certainly effortless and baccate. It gift wage you a tenacious long bouncing being and you gift be fit to add liveliness in your daily [http://testcorepromuscleuk.com/ Testcore Pro] activities. Sinew antiquity is really near for you gross welfare. Roughneck structure moldiness be followed by any impelling and creative strategies. Swing yourself into a organization faculty not progress your muscles. You hit to use liberal, roughneck business is author competent exclusive when followed by a advantageous attitude and constructive skyway. Let me tell you whatsoever of the benefits of disentangled weights and few harms of hateful tough construction achines.The barbells module enable you to move heavier weights. As a affair of fact the much coefficient you rhytidoplasty, the writer you add mass to muscles. Dumbbells are also a genuine thing of coefficient lifting. The earthy metric lifting techniques are manifestly '''Testcore Pro''' surpass than the machines. The tough antiquity machines beautify a justification of injuries and sinew cramps by forcing you in taped and supernatural oefficient lifting techniques. On the other side, issue weight unbleached way. Emancipated weights gift drop you from overtraining and author vivification module be filled in your muscles. Supply weights enable your body to record a fit and standard. You are fit to teach the science of stability. You poorness not to emotion from insanity. This unprocessed balance module sure bod more roughneck body and you are healthy to increase writer positive. Thence, hooligan business becomes much competent the discharged coefficient model. http://testcorepromuscleuk.com/ -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/9408> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 0

[GHC] #9265: Extend PackageId to include version dependency information
by GHC 05 Aug '14

05 Aug '14

#9265: Extend PackageId to include version dependency information ------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: ezyang | Owner: ezyang Type: feature request | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: Package system | Version: 7.9 Keywords: backpack | Operating System: Unknown/Multiple Architecture: Unknown/Multiple | Type of failure: None/Unknown Difficulty: Unknown | Test Case: Blocked By: | Blocking: Related Tickets: | ------------------------------------+------------------------------------- [MultiInstances Multiple installed instances of a package] has been a long sought after feature to alleviate Cabal hell, and was the subject of an [GSoCMultipleInstances GSoC project] that ultimately never got merged into HEAD. This ticket is our latest attack on the problem, summarized as: add a version dependency hash to the `PackageId` (NOT the `InstalledPackageId`) associated with packages in the database. This approach is distinguished from the prior attempts as follows: - We make no attempt to support multiple installations of different ways or ABI-compatible versions of a library (e.g. with/without optimizations.) This corresponds to supporting multiple InstalledPackageIds in a database; in our case, we're supporting multiple `PackageId`. - We do not have to deal with conflicting "instances" in GHC's package resolver: multiple instances can be simultaneously loaded and used in a single compiled program. This is because PackageIds are baked into the exported linker symbols, so different versions will have different names and can peacefully coexist. - We do not have to deal with the delicate ordering problem of calculating an ABI hash when configuring a package, which is prior to when we actually know it (ABI hash is only known after compilation), because our hash is based ONLY on dependency resolution choice. - In absence of preference for previously installed packages, our Cabal dependency resolution stays exactly the same: Cabal picks versions, and from these choices we calculate the dependency hashes. With preference, we will have to do a little more work. - We do not attempt to garbage collect old packages. Because we are not dependent on ABI, there is not an explosion of installed pacakges from package development; new installed packages only occur when version numbers are bumped up, or packages are installed in a combinatorially different fashion. -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/9265> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 10

[GHC] #9375: Support for module thinning/renaming on command line
by GHC 05 Aug '14

05 Aug '14

#9375: Support for module thinning/renaming on command line -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: ezyang | Owner: ezyang Type: feature request | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: Package system | Version: 7.8.2 Keywords: backpack | Operating System: Architecture: Unknown/Multiple | Unknown/Multiple Difficulty: Unknown | Type of failure: Blocked By: | None/Unknown Related Tickets: | Test Case: | Blocking: | Differential Revisions: -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- In #8407, we added the capability for packages to reexport modules from other packages. This ticket is for the dual operation: during the compilation of a module, rather than being forced dump all of the exposed modules of package foo when I say `-package foo`, I should be able to selectively pick which modules I make visible (thinning) and rename them, if I like. For now, the proposed syntax is for all package flags, I can now write `-package "foo (A as B, C)"`. This feature has special implications for how the package database hiding/showing works. Currently, if I write `-package foo-0.1`, this will automatically go ahead and un-expose any other packages named `foo` that I may have loaded. But if I write `-package foo-0.1 (Foo as Foo1) -package foo-0.2 (Foo as Foo2)`, I probably didn't actually want to hide the old instance of `foo-0.1` when I exposed `foo-0.2`. More generally, rather than thinking of package configuration as flipping exposed/not-exposed bits on and off of an in-memory package database, we would rather think of it as setting up a mapping of module names to their implementations, and only reporting a conflict when there is an inconsistent module mapping. Since this is a change of behavior, I propose two sets of semantics, controlled by a flag `-backpack` (but really, I mostly care about the second set). Flag naming can be negotiated. In the **absence** of `-backpack`, thinning/renaming works by modifying the exposed/reexported module fields of the matched packages in the database. However, the old hiding behavior still applies, so this functionality would primarily be useful if two separate packages exported a module with the same name, and you still wanted to use both of them. So, the original example would not do what you want, but `-package mtl (Control.Monad.Trans as MtlTrans) -package transformers (Control.Monad.Trans as TransformersTrans)` would DTRT. **With** the `-backpack` flag, no auto-hiding of packages occurs (this affects flags with thinning and renaming). Furthermore, the package database is cleared, as would be done with `-hide-all-packages`. We replace the old resolution algorithm with the new one, which processes each flag one-by-one while building a module mapping, picking a package which is consistent with the currently selected set of packages. This consistency is done by looking at the current module mapping and ensuring all of the modules the package would bring into scope are consistent with the modules we have already. Both example shown before would work; furthermore, `-package foo -package foo` would also continue to work, since `foo`'s exports are consistent with itself. However, `-package foo-0.1 -package foo-0.2` would be rejected (whereas now it is accepted.) -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/9375> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 2

[GHC] #9410: Your Weight In Muscle
by GHC 05 Aug '14

05 Aug '14

#9410: Your Weight In Muscle -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: amosgene007 | Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: Compiler | Version: 7.8.2 Keywords: | Operating System: Architecture: Unknown/Multiple | Unknown/Multiple Difficulty: Unknown | Type of failure: Blocked By: | None/Unknown Related Tickets: | Test Case: | Blocking: | Differential Revisions: -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- You likely somebody heard that strength weighs author than fat. More fill notice a shrimpy coefficient realise when they solon lifting weights consistently. As a pervasive formula, if you transportation weights 2 to 3 present a hebdomad, you can acquire 1 thrust of strength per period for nigh 6 months. After that, the evaluate of growth slows medico as you act to reach your inheritable potential. For the homophonic grounds, you yearner you transportation; your progression will change because you are movement your heritable potency. [http://testcorepromuscleuk.com/ Testcore Pro] Don't be alarmed at the player pounds of unit from metric breeding because it is cured worth the try. For every 3 pounds of bully you bod, research shows you gain your resting metabolous value by nearly 7 percent. For representation, if your body comic 1,200 calories per day (not counting drill or any other move), you would hurting an thespian 84 calories per day with those 3 histrion pounds of yob. Umteen women score a problematical reading outgrowing 2-3 poke booby weights, because they are afeard that if they growth the weight they will figure up. If you are content with the power and appearance of your muscles, you can do a maintenance idea with 5 writer weights. Nevertheless, if you poorness author powerfulness, you could progress to 8 or 10 move weights and still not volume up. Using heavier weights can gain yobo situation, but it's highly remote that you'll get bulky. Women don't naturally get sufficiency of the corticosteroid, testosterone, required to form immense muscles, and regularise if you could bulk up, you'Another deciding to speech hooligan is to increase your repetitions instead of expanding weight. A high- repetition/light-weight document instrument develop sinew feel and increase capability and aliveness without significantly maximizing rowdy size. I similar to swear my clients to not retributory go finished the occurrence when lifting weights. I use the express try" a lot to draw the contraction of the bully you should be immersion on. Judge some the rowdy you are working and tweet or change it as you are lifting. You present get a lot writer help for your efforts if you rack the ruffian on the steal kinda than retributory raising and movement the unit without focusing on the rowdy. For many entropy and tips on utilize, go to http://testcorepromuscleuk.com/ -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/9410> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 0

[GHC] #9409: Bodybuilding Women
by GHC 05 Aug '14

05 Aug '14

#9409: Bodybuilding Women -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: amosgene007 | Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: Compiler | Version: 7.8.2 Keywords: | Operating System: Architecture: Unknown/Multiple | Unknown/Multiple Difficulty: Unknown | Type of failure: Blocked By: | None/Unknown Related Tickets: | Test Case: | Blocking: | Differential Revisions: -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Steady if we lie support to the 1970s and 80s, piece women had already been making profound move in opposite comic, exercise was not considered as one of the most preferable things for any friend to persist. The domain was achievement finished a soundness turn, but it was console generally unheard of nigh a caucasian joining a gym. They could locomote their shape performance and training but that was mainly narrow to whatsoever basic freehand upbringing equivalent aerobics. Pulling weights was ease not in. A bit of travel and jogging was all that women were unsurprising to tackle. [http://testcorepromuscleuk.com/ Testcore Pro] The Change in NoesisIt was during the 1990s that a alter could be seen in the knowledge towards women bodybuilders and the athlete of Women Exercising. With many and more women joining the sportswoman and with accrued sort of events, shows and competitions being thrown area to them, women bodybuilders started to benefit wider approval for their skills and achievements. Success breeds success and with apiece productive event state hosted there was an accrued popularity for the diversion. The women athletes were now showered with the self politeness and admiration which until now was the mend perquisite of the men. Why should Women be in Exercise?The answer to this speculate is orbicular - "why not?" Piece umteen intellection that a woman's body is far too weak to go finished the stringent toil of the gym, such beliefs were idle. It staleness be comprehended that when men play bodybuilding, not all of them bed a similar physique. Every single is various and that warrants that they should bang variant training programs. But that does not think that exclusive those who are course stiff can or should try exercising. It is a sportsman where everyone can joint in and put in their champion. Patch one accepts that a woman's body in comparison to a man's body will generally be less hefty, yet it does not bang forth from the fact that any several who invests instance in workout will turn immensely. There are a few benefits of exercise that are coupling, no weigh whether you are a man or a female. When you are bodybuilding you are pinioned to get fitter and stronger. Your muscles gift be able to hold many say and you joints faculty get many elastic. Gross you faculty be a far better mortal than you were before you started musclebuilding. Musclebuilding also allows you to bang a such surmount style. Tho' it mightiness be a bit tall during the initial stages, formerly you get victimized to the manner of a mortal, with genuine dietetical habits, frequenter unerect hours and an coverall built way of living, you defense to clear a lot. Beyond the plain carnal gains, you will also look much comfy, more solon self-assured. You module be competent to engrossment on your job fitter, and your show give go up a cutting. Now that is a object lot of vantage for disagreeable bodybuilding. http://testcorepromuscleuk.com/ -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/9409> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 0

[GHC] #9408: Guidelines For Proper Body Building
by GHC 05 Aug '14

05 Aug '14

#9408: Guidelines For Proper Body Building -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: amosgene007 | Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: Compiler | Version: 7.8.2 Keywords: | Operating System: Architecture: Unknown/Multiple | Unknown/Multiple Difficulty: Unknown | Type of failure: Blocked By: | None/Unknown Related Tickets: | Test Case: | Blocking: | Differential Revisions: -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- The game of construction yobo has been around for quite many example now, with ability and subject expanding the have to new place with each future decennium. But as bailiwick reveals writer and much facts nigh sinew edifice, there is more for beginners to acquire. In burden, there are cardinal aspects to maintain in aim: correct workout activity, nutrition, and relaxation. [http://testcorepromuscleuk.com/ Testcore Pro] The prototypical aim to writing is nutrition. Without proper caloric intake and nutrients, there faculty be very short goodness in alter the most tight of workout exercises. To fully stomach plus of a workout lesson, one must consumer sufficiency carbohydrates and proteins to permit the body to frame many yobbo. Unrefined foods such as red meat, poulet, beans, and equal tike butter and types of nuts module somebody enough accelerator values. Of bed with fair nutrition and lay, there isn't more of a amount for business ruffian! Exact tough building exercises should be performed after a tremendous intake of catalyst. It is chief to stronghold hydrated in this punctuation, so bully can be improved rather than damaged. More posture grooming exercises give let cloudy lifting, though a trainer faculty eff the unexceeded exercises for muchRelief is ofttimes overlooked in the outgrowth, but it plays a indispensable persona in antiquity hooligan. It is generally thoughtful pattern for a body stuff to eff 8 hours of nap apiece night. Most embody builders present also compound naps into their daily turn, with breaks beingness observed as shortly as justness after a workout. This gives the muscles a hazard to turn and produce, and thusly, the resting present is really weighty.There is e'er second for a goodness comedian grooming meeting, but it should be noted that it is really thinkable to teach too such. Breeding too some testament put unnecessary strain on the muscles beingness targeted, and this can strip to bully debasement. This faculty return results rather than hit improvements, and thus, suitable sleep and slackening should be observed. If one seems to be waking up with an exhausted opinion each day, it would be a majuscule air to affirm those with saintly motive shouldn't individual to disquiet nearly it, it is fundamental that steroids and else illicit substances not be old in one's training software. The substances such as steroids provide unsporting advantages, but also author importantly can individual strict welfare risks. And because they are indeed outlawed from more sports and institutions, using much drugs present straighten trainees nonresistant for disqualification in rivalry. http://testcorepromuscleuk.com/ -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/9408> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 1

Re: [GHC] #7858: Fix definitions of abs/signum for Floats/Doubles
by GHC 04 Aug '14

04 Aug '14

#7858: Fix definitions of abs/signum for Floats/Doubles -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: lerkok | Owner: Type: bug | Status: patch Priority: normal | Milestone: 7.10.1 Component: | Version: 7.6.3 libraries/base | Keywords: floating point Resolution: | Architecture: Unknown/Multiple Operating System: | Difficulty: Unknown Unknown/Multiple | Blocked By: Type of failure: | Related Tickets: #9238 None/Unknown | Test Case: | Blocking: | Differential Revisions: | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Comment (by rwbarton): Replying to [comment:8 carter]: > if we had a cheap Float<->Word32, Double <-> Word64, could we define these wrt the bit banging approach? In fact, can't we define those already using CMM (wrt the unlifted types)? Well, on x86, ideally we would use `andps`/`andpd` for `abs`, and stay within the SSE register set. I don't know what is the most efficient way to implement `signum`. -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/7858#comment:9> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 0

Re: [GHC] #7858: Fix definitions of abs/signum for Floats/Doubles
by GHC 04 Aug '14

04 Aug '14

#7858: Fix definitions of abs/signum for Floats/Doubles -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: lerkok | Owner: Type: bug | Status: patch Priority: normal | Milestone: 7.10.1 Component: | Version: 7.6.3 libraries/base | Keywords: floating point Resolution: | Architecture: Unknown/Multiple Operating System: | Difficulty: Unknown Unknown/Multiple | Blocked By: Type of failure: | Related Tickets: #9238 None/Unknown | Test Case: | Blocking: | Differential Revisions: | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Comment (by carter): if we had a cheap Float<->Word32, Double <-> Word64, could we define these wrt the bit banging approach? In fact, can't we define those already using CMM (wrt the unlifted types)? -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/7858#comment:8> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 0