March 2015 - ghc-tickets

[GHC] #10075: Muddling Constraint and * means that Core is inconsistent
by GHC 17 Mar '16

17 Mar '16

#10075: Muddling Constraint and * means that Core is inconsistent -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: goldfire | Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: Compiler | Version: 7.8.4 Keywords: | Operating System: Unknown/Multiple Architecture: | Type of failure: None/Unknown Unknown/Multiple | Blocked By: Test Case: | Related Tickets: Blocking: | Differential Revisions: | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- I can say this: {{{ type family F (a :: k) type instance F (a :: Constraint) = Int type instance F (a :: *) = Bool }}} This compiles to the following Core: {{{ F :: forall (k :: BOX). k -> * axF1 :: [a :: Constraint].F Constraint a ~ Int axF2 :: [a :: *]. F * a ~ Bool }}} I can then build the following: {{{ sym axF1[Any Constraint] ; axF2[Any *] :: Int ~ Bool }}} The transitivity is sound because, in Core, `Constraint` and `*` are indistinguishable. I don't think there's a way to actually cause a bug in a running program due to this problem, but we should probably patch it up. Possible resolution: Have `coreView` change `Constraint` to `*`. Possible resolution once we have `* :: *`: Make `Constraint` and `*` representationally equal. In other words, it would be as if `Constraint` were a newtype around `*`. I haven't thought out the ramifications of this decision, but there's something nice about it. -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/10075> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 3

[GHC] #9803: Poor error message for unbound variable in pattern synonym
by GHC 17 Mar '16

17 Mar '16

#9803: Poor error message for unbound variable in pattern synonym -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: goldfire | Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: Compiler | Version: 7.9 Keywords: | Operating System: Architecture: Unknown/Multiple | Unknown/Multiple Difficulty: Easy (less than 1 | Type of failure: hour) | None/Unknown Blocked By: | Test Case: Related Tickets: | Blocking: | Differential Revisions: -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- When I say {{{ pattern OneElt = [x] }}} I get {{{ Right-hand side of bidirectional pattern synonym cannot be used as an expression [x] }}} I have two complaints with this error message: 1. It's very unclear what's actually wrong with the pattern -- `[x]` looks like a perfectly fine expression, until I realize that `x` is unbound. 2. The herald of the error is more than 80 characters (if you count the indentation) and wraps on my 80-character terminal. GHC tends to avoid this elsewhere, and so the wrapping is suboptimal. I would easily say that issue (1) is more important than issue (2). Perhaps this would be better: {{{ Variable `x' is unbound in the bidirectional pattern synonym `OneElt': [x] }}} -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/9803> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 5

[GHC] #8132: Warning for Typeable instances misplaced
by GHC 16 Mar '16

16 Mar '16

#8132: Warning for Typeable instances misplaced -------------------------+------------------------------------------------- Reporter: | Owner: scottgw | Status: new Type: bug | Milestone: Priority: | Version: 7.7 normal | Operating System: Unknown/Multiple Component: | Type of failure: Incorrect warning at Compiler | compile-time Keywords: | Test Case: Architecture: | Blocking: Unknown/Multiple | Difficulty: | Unknown | Blocked By: | Related Tickets: | -------------------------+------------------------------------------------- There is currently a warning for hand-rolled instances of Typeable. However, this leads to some pretty surprising error messages: because the instance is ignored any code that relies on that instance in the same module just fails, which appears pretty weird to the user. {{{ #!haskell import Data.Typeable data K = K instance Typeable K where typeRep _ = undefined ex :: TypeRep ex = typeRep (undefined :: Proxy K) }}} Gives as an error: {{{ No instance for (Typeable * K) arising from a use of ‛typeRep’ In the expression: typeRep (undefined :: Proxy K) In an equation for ‛ex’: ex = typeRep (undefined :: Proxy K) }}} Which is of course surprising because the user just defined the instance. After commenting out the code that uses the instance, one gets: {{{ TypEx.hs:1:1: Warning: Typeable instances can only be derived; ignoring the following instance: instance Typeable * K -- Defined at TypEx.hs:5:10 }}} This information should clearly be somehow presented before or with the previous error if the user is to have any way to figure out what is going on. I suppose this could be fixed by: 1. Turning the Typeable instance warning into an error 2. Checking the missing instance in the existing error for Typeable and suggest that the user should look for hand written instances as a source of the problem. -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/8132> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 17

[GHC] #9887: No message when GCHI reusing compiled code
by GHC 12 Mar '16

12 Mar '16

#9887: No message when GCHI reusing compiled code -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: jsrice | Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: GHCi | Version: 7.8.3 Keywords: | Operating System: Architecture: Unknown/Multiple | Unknown/Multiple Difficulty: Easy (less than 1 | Type of failure: Other hour) | Test Case: Blocked By: | Blocking: Related Tickets: | Differential Revisions: -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Running ":l Main.hs" at the GHCI prompt would load the compiled module. I am new to Haskell and this was a stumbling block that made it so that I could not interactively debug my code with GHCI. Deleting the object files was suggested to me on IRC and that allowed me to get the "*Main" prompt I was looking for. A message warning users "reusing compiled code" would likely save some future users some time. -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/9887> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 8

[GHC] #9699: TH function to list names in scope
by GHC 06 Mar '16

06 Mar '16

#9699: TH function to list names in scope -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: MikeIzbicki | Owner: Type: feature request | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: Template Haskell | Version: 7.8.3 Keywords: | Operating System: Architecture: Unknown/Multiple | Unknown/Multiple Difficulty: Unknown | Type of failure: Blocked By: | None/Unknown Related Tickets: | Test Case: | Blocking: | Differential Revisions: -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- I [asked about this on stackoverflow](http://stackoverflow.com/questions/26394199/using- templatehaskell-to-list-all-names-in-a-namespace), and apparently it doesn't exist yet. I want a TemplateHaskell function `variablesInScope :: Q [Name]` that returns a list of the `Name`'s of all the variables in scope. TemplateHaskell obviously has this information available in order to implement functions like `reify :: Name -> Q Info` and `lookupValueName :: String -> Q (Maybe Name)`. So it seems like this might be a pretty simple function to add. -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/9699> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 6

[GHC] #9043: Add missing type class instances for data types in GHC.Generics
by GHC 27 Feb '16

27 Feb '16

#9043: Add missing type class instances for data types in GHC.Generics ------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: ocharles | Owner: Type: feature request | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: libraries/base | Version: 7.8.2 Keywords: | Operating System: Unknown/Multiple Architecture: Unknown/Multiple | Type of failure: None/Unknown Difficulty: Unknown | Test Case: Blocked By: | Blocking: Related Tickets: | ------------------------------------+------------------------------------- GHC.Generics offers a bunch of data types which have valid instances of various type classes in base, such as Functor. There's no good reason not to have these instances, so they should be added. -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/9043> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 38

[GHC] #8710: Overlapping patterns warning misplaced
by GHC 27 Feb '16

27 Feb '16

#8710: Overlapping patterns warning misplaced -------------------------+------------------------------------------------- Reporter: | Owner: goldfire | Status: new Type: bug | Milestone: Priority: low | Version: 7.7 Component: | Operating System: Unknown/Multiple Compiler | Type of failure: Incorrect warning at Keywords: | compile-time Architecture: | Test Case: Unknown/Multiple | Blocking: Difficulty: | Unknown | Blocked By: | Related Tickets: | -------------------------+------------------------------------------------- Consider {{{ {-# OPTIONS_GHC -fwarn-overlapping-patterns #-} len [] = 0 len (_:t) = 1 + len t len _ = error "urk" }}} GHC reports the problem with this definition at the first line of it. I think it would be more helpful to have it at the last line, which is the pattern that will never match. -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/8710> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 22

[GHC] #9917: ddump-llvm runs opt/llc even when -fllvm isnt set
by GHC 27 Feb '16

27 Feb '16

#9917: ddump-llvm runs opt/llc even when -fllvm isnt set -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: carter | Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: Compiler | Version: 7.8.3 Keywords: | Operating System: Architecture: Unknown/Multiple | Unknown/Multiple Difficulty: Unknown | Type of failure: Blocked By: | None/Unknown Related Tickets: | Test Case: | Blocking: | Differential Revisions: -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- to reproduce put {{{ main= putStrLn "hello world" }}} in hello.hs and then invoke `ghc hello.hs -O2 -v3 -fforce-recomp -ddump-llvm` then at some point you'll see something like {{{ *** LLVM Optimiser: opt-3.4 /var/folders/py/wgp_hj9d2rl3cx48yym_ynj00000gn/T/ghc88460_0/ghc88460_2.ll -o /var/folders/py/wgp_hj9d2rl3cx48yym_ynj00000gn/T/ghc88460_0/ghc88460_4.bc -O2 '--enable-tbaa=true' *** LLVM Compiler: llc-3.4 -O2 '-relocation-model=pic' /var/folders/py/wgp_hj9d2rl3cx48yym_ynj00000gn/T/ghc88460_0/ghc88460_4.bc -o /var/folders/py/wgp_hj9d2rl3cx48yym_ynj00000gn/T/ghc88460_0/ghc88460_5.lm_s '--enable-tbaa=true' '-mattr=+sse2' *** LLVM Mangler: }}} in the output -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/9917> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 5

[GHC] #10217: Provide link to GPG signature on download page.
by GHC 25 Feb '16

25 Feb '16

#10217: Provide link to GPG signature on download page. -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: f-a | Owner: Type: feature | Status: new request | Milestone: Priority: normal | Version: 7.10.1 Component: | Operating System: Unknown/Multiple Documentation | Type of failure: Documentation Keywords: GPG, | bug signature | Blocked By: Architecture: | Related Tickets: Unknown/Multiple | Test Case: | Blocking: | Differential Revisions: | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- As now, in the section "Binary packages" of GHC download page, you can read: > SHA-256 hashes for all the binary distributions are available here. with a link to the hashes' file. It would be great to provide a link to the signature of this file too, i.e.: > SHA-256 hashes for all the binary distributions are available here[link] (GPG signature available here[link], signed with key <keyID>). Hashes and Signatures are advertised in the mailing list release post, but I guess it would be nice for clarity's sake having them on the download page too. -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/10217> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 4

[GHC] #8176: Language extensions not registered
by GHC 20 Feb '16

20 Feb '16

#8176: Language extensions not registered --------------------------------+------------------------------------------ Reporter: duncan | Owner: thoughtpolice Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: 7.8.1 Component: Compiler | Version: 7.7 Keywords: | Operating System: Unknown/Multiple Architecture: | Type of failure: None/Unknown Unknown/Multiple | Test Case: tests/driver/T4437.hs Difficulty: Unknown | Blocking: Blocked By: | Related Tickets: | --------------------------------+------------------------------------------ tests/driver/T4437.hs does not seem to be being used properly. That test is there to make sure that ghc developers do not forget to register their new extensions with Cabal. But it looks like it's just being silenced and they are being forgotten again. Recall, the protocol is that all Haskell implementations can register their extensions in the central location (which is Language.Haskell.Extensions in the Cabal package) when they are happy that they are ready for public consumption. This matters to users because extensions that are not ready for public consumption (ie not registered) cannot be used in packages uploaded to hackage. Currently `tests/driver/T4437.hs` contains: {{{ expectedGhcOnlyExtensions = [ "AllowAmbiguousTypes", "RelaxedLayout", "AlternativeLayoutRule", "AlternativeLayoutRuleTransitional", "ExplicitNamespaces", "TypeHoles", "OverloadedLists", "EmptyCase", "AutoDeriveTypeable", "NegativeLiterals", "NullaryTypeClasses"] }}} This looks like a much bigger list than it should be. Surely not all of these extensions are private to ghc or are still under development and not to be used? But if they are listed here, then the test doesn't complain about them. And the whole point of this test is to stop ghc devs from forgetting to register them. I think we need to change the test so that we distinguish between extensions that are really not ready, and ones that are on-track to be public. It should be a release blocker for the "on-track to be public" ones to still not be registered. The test should have comments giving this guidance for ghc contributors. I'm not quite sure how we adjust the test to make that happen (ie different behaviour for RC-build vs normal hacking validate). -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/8176> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 17