September 2015 - ghc-tickets

[GHC] #10770: Typeable solver has strange effects
by GHC 25 May '18

25 May '18

#10770: Typeable solver has strange effects -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: | Owner: NeilMitchell | Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: Compiler | Version: 7.10.1 Keywords: | Operating System: Unknown/Multiple Architecture: | Type of failure: None/Unknown Unknown/Multiple | Test Case: | Blocked By: Blocking: | Related Tickets: Differential Revisions: | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Given: {{{#!hs import Data.Typeable main = print $ foo $ Just () foo :: Typeable (t a) => t a -> String foo x = let k = show $ typeOf x in k }}} I get: {{{ TypeableInfer.hs:7:24: Could not deduce (Typeable t) arising from a use of `typeOf' from the context (Typeable (t a)) bound by the type signature for foo :: Typeable (t a) => t a -> String at TypeableInfer.hs:6:8-38 In the second argument of `($)', namely `typeOf x' In the expression: show $ typeOf x In an equation for `k': k = show $ typeOf x }}} However, the error goes away with the minor modification of: {{{#!hs foo x = show $ typeOf x }}} -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/10770> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 9

[GHC] #10490: Missing binder type check in coercion equality test?
by GHC 25 May '18

25 May '18

#10490: Missing binder type check in coercion equality test? -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: ezyang | Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: Compiler | Version: 7.11 (Type checker) | Operating System: Unknown/Multiple Keywords: | Type of failure: None/Unknown Architecture: | Blocked By: Unknown/Multiple | Related Tickets: Test Case: | Blocking: | Differential Revisions: | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- I was reading the equality testing code for coercions and I noticed this line: {{{ coreEqCoercion2 env (ForAllCo v1 co1) (ForAllCo v2 co2) = coreEqCoercion2 (rnBndr2 env v1 v2) co1 co2 }}} This doesn't test if the types of the binders are equal. Should it? (Or is the type always trivially the same?) -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/10490> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 3

[GHC] #9587: Type checking with type functions introduces many type variables, which remain ambiguous. The code no longer type checks.
by GHC 25 May '18

25 May '18

#9587: Type checking with type functions introduces many type variables, which remain ambiguous. The code no longer type checks. -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: oleg | Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: Compiler (Type | Version: 7.8.3 checker) | Operating System: Keywords: type family, | Unknown/Multiple ambiguity check | Type of failure: GHC Architecture: Unknown/Multiple | rejects valid program Difficulty: Unknown | Test Case: Blocked By: | Blocking: Related Tickets: | Differential Revisions: -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Before the type ambiguity check was introduced, I could write the following code {{{ {-# LANGUAGE NoMonomorphismRestriction #-} {-# LANGUAGE TypeFamilies #-} {-# LANGUAGE KindSignatures #-} {-# LANGUAGE ScopedTypeVariables #-} -- {-# LANGUAGE AllowAmbiguousTypes #-} module T where type family Arr (repr :: * -> *) (a :: *) (b :: *) :: * class ESymantics repr where int :: Int -> repr Int add :: repr Int -> repr Int -> repr Int lam :: (repr a -> repr b) -> repr (Arr repr a b) app :: repr (Arr repr a b) -> repr a -> repr b {- te4 :: (Arr repr (Arr repr Int Int) (Arr repr Int Int) ~ Arr repr (Arr repr Int Int) (Arr repr Int b), ESymantics repr) => repr b -} te4 = let c3 = lam (\f -> lam (\x -> f `app` (f `app` (f `app` x)))) in (c3 `app` (lam (\x -> x `add` int 14))) `app` (int 0) -- t = lam (\f -> f `app` int 0) newtype R a = R{unR :: a} type instance Arr R a b = a -> b instance ESymantics R where int = R add (R x) (R y) = R $ x + y lam f = R $ unR . f . R app (R f) (R x) = R $ f x tR = unR te4 }}} (This is a simple code abstracted from a longer code that for sure worked in 2010: I showed it in a SSGIP lecture at Oxford.) The inferred type of te4 is shown in comments. The type is not ideal but the best what can be done under circumstances. In tR, repr is instantiated to R and the type function Arr can finally be applied and the equality constraint resolved. Since then, the type inference has changed and the code no longer type checks: {{{ Could not deduce (Arr repr (Arr repr a0 b0) (Arr repr a2 b0) ~ Arr repr (Arr repr a b) (Arr repr a4 b)) from the context (ESymantics repr, Arr repr a4 a3 ~ Arr repr a b, Arr repr a3 a ~ Arr repr a b) bound by the inferred type for ‘c3’: (ESymantics repr, Arr repr a4 a3 ~ Arr repr a b, Arr repr a3 a ~ Arr repr a b) => repr (Arr repr (Arr repr a b) (Arr repr a4 b)) }}} What is worse, there does not appear to be *any* way to get the code to type check. No amount of type annotations helps. The code has to be dramatically re-written, or just given up. -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/9587> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 13

[GHC] #9607: Type checking regression between GHC 7.6 and 7.8
by GHC 25 May '18

25 May '18

#9607: Type checking regression between GHC 7.6 and 7.8 -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: jstolarek | Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: Compiler (Type | Version: 7.8.3 checker) | Operating System: Keywords: | Unknown/Multiple Architecture: Unknown/Multiple | Type of failure: GHC Difficulty: Unknown | rejects valid program Blocked By: | Test Case: Related Tickets: | Blocking: | Differential Revisions: -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Jason McCarty [http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell- cafe/2014-September/116076.html reported on Haskell-cafe] that this code used to work with GHC 7.6 but in GHC 7.8 it requires `AllowAmbiguousTypes`: {{{#!hs -- The code below is simplified from code that computes a tensor product of -- a tensor with an identity matrix whose size is determined from the -- shapes of the input and output tensors. {-# LANGUAGE DataKinds, KindSignatures, TypeFamilies, TypeOperators #-} --{-# LANGUAGE AllowAmbiguousTypes #-} module Tensors where import GHC.TypeLits type family (as :: [Nat]) ++ (bs :: [Nat]) :: [Nat] type instance '[] ++ bs = bs type instance (a ': as) ++ bs = a ': (as ++ bs) data Tensor (s :: [Nat]) = Tensor -- content elided -- apparently GHC reduces (++) enough to see that n is determined leftUnit :: Tensor s -> Tensor ('[n, n] ++ s) leftUnit Tensor = Tensor -- accepted in 7.6, not accepted in 7.8 without AllowAmbiguousTypes rightUnit :: Tensor s -> Tensor (s ++ '[n, n]) rightUnit Tensor = Tensor -- also accepted without AllowAmbiguousTypes outsideUnit :: Tensor s -> Tensor ('[n] ++ s ++ '[n]) outsideUnit Tensor = Tensor useleftUnit :: Tensor '[1,1,2] useleftUnit = leftUnit Tensor -- type of Tensor is inferred userightUnit :: Tensor '[1,2,2] userightUnit = rightUnit (Tensor :: Tensor '[1]) -- type must be provided }}} -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/9607> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 10

[GHC] #9980: TcS monad is too heavy
by GHC 24 May '18

24 May '18

#9980: TcS monad is too heavy -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: simonpj | Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: Compiler | Version: 7.8.4 Keywords: | Operating System: Unknown/Multiple Architecture: | Type of failure: None/Unknown Unknown/Multiple | Blocked By: Test Case: | Related Tickets: Blocking: | Differential Revisions: | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- The typehcecker's constraint-solving monad, `TcS`, is simply built on top of `TcM`, but it doesn't use most of `TcM`'s facilities. That was fine while `TcS` was only called from the typechecker, but now (as part of [wiki:PatternMatchCheck fixing pattern-match overlap checking]) we invoke it from the desugarer. It seems quite wrong to construct a vast, and unnecessary `TcM` context just to invoke `TcS`. Better: make `TcS` into its own monad, with its own `TcSLclEnv`, built on `IOEnv` like the others. Main objection: the plugins mechanism exposes `unsafeTcPluginTcM`, which would become unavailable. But it it used? -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/9980> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 8

[GHC] #10089: feature: warn about unused data definitions (with typeclass instances)
by GHC 23 May '18

23 May '18

#10089: feature: warn about unused data definitions (with typeclass instances) -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: slyfox | Owner: Type: feature | Status: new request | Milestone: Priority: normal | Version: 7.8.4 Component: Compiler | Operating System: Unknown/Multiple Keywords: | Type of failure: None/Unknown Architecture: | Blocked By: Unknown/Multiple | Related Tickets: Test Case: | Blocking: | Differential Revisions: | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Let's consider an example: {{{#!hs -- M.hs: module M () where -- ghc knows about uselessness of those data D = D -- but doesn't about this: data E = E deriving (Show, Read) }}} '''ghc''' warns about useless '''D''', but not '''E''': {{{ $ ghc-7.8.4 -Wall -c M.hs -fforce-recomp M.hs:5:1: Warning: Defined but not used: type constructor or class ‘D’ M.hs:5:10: Warning: Defined but not used: data constructor ‘D’ }}} There is no way to refer to '''E''' type outside or call it's unstances, correct? I would expect no code should be generated for this module. '''ghc''' could also warn about defined, but not used instances for types, that are not exported. Some background on where those stray types come from: 1. programmer usually adds a set of data types into their program (say, 10-15 types to represent an AST) 2. then annotates them with 'deriving (Read, Show)' convenience instances 3. (months later) amends AST representation a bit and leaves leftover data types not used anywhere Does that make sense? Thanks! -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/10089> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 8

[GHC] #9918: GHC chooses an instance between two overlapping, but cannot resolve a clause within the similar closed type family
by GHC 23 May '18

23 May '18

#9918: GHC chooses an instance between two overlapping, but cannot resolve a clause within the similar closed type family -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: qnikst | Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: Compiler | Version: 7.8.3 Keywords: | Operating System: Architecture: Unknown/Multiple | Unknown/Multiple Difficulty: Unknown | Type of failure: Blocked By: | None/Unknown Related Tickets: | Test Case: | Blocking: | Differential Revisions: -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- We hoped that closed type families could replace overlapping instances. It is not currently the case: GHC can resolve overlapping instances but cannot resolve the similar closed type family. I'm attaching a minimized example of program where it can be observed. This is reproducible on ghc-7.8.3 and HEAD. -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/9918> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 21

[GHC] #10241: BlockedIndefinitelyOnMVar thrown to the thread which is not blocked indefinitely
by GHC 21 May '18

21 May '18

#10241: BlockedIndefinitelyOnMVar thrown to the thread which is not blocked indefinitely -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: asukamirai | Owner: simonmar Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: Runtime | Version: 7.8.3 System | Operating System: Unknown/Multiple Keywords: | Type of failure: Incorrect result Architecture: x86_64 | at runtime (amd64) | Blocked By: Test Case: | Related Tickets: Blocking: | Differential Revisions: | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- BlockedIndefinatelyOnMVar exception is thrown to the main thread in below source code although the thread is not blocked indefinitely. {{{#!hs module Main where import qualified Control.Concurrent.MVar as MV import qualified Control.Concurrent as CC import qualified Control.Exception as E main :: IO () main = do -- call this thread "threadA" mvar1 <- MV.newEmptyMVar :: IO (MV.MVar ()) mvar2 <- MV.newEmptyMVar :: IO (MV.MVar ()) _ <- CC.forkIO $ do -- call this thread "threadB" MV.takeMVar mvar1 `E.catch` errorHandler1 putStrLn "after error catch" CC.threadDelay 1000000 MV.putMVar mvar2 () putStrLn "after putMVar" MV.readMVar mvar2 `E.catch` errorHandler2 putStrLn "after readMVar" CC.threadDelay 5000000 where errorHandler1 :: E.BlockedIndefinitelyOnMVar -> IO () errorHandler1 e = putStrLn $ "errorHandler1 : " ++ show e errorHandler2 :: E.BlockedIndefinitelyOnMVar -> IO () errorHandler2 e = putStrLn $ "errorHandler2 : " ++ show e }}} Save above as "mvar.hs" and run by ghc as below. {{{ > runhaskell mvar.hs errorHandler1 : thread blocked indefinitely in an MVar operation errorHandler2 : thread blocked indefinitely in an MVar operation after error catch after readMVar after putMVar }}} BlockedIndefinitelyOnMVar thrown for mvar1 is correct. It will be caught by errorHandler1 and "threadB" can continue to put the value to mvar2. It means that "threadA" can wait for the value of mvar2 and it is not blocked indefinately. However, BlockedIndefinitelyOnMVar is thrown for mvar2 on "threadA" before "threadB" puts value to the mvar2. I think it is incorrect. ---- I tested another case that adding "CC.threadDelay 10000000" before "readMVar" as below. {{{#!hs module Main where import qualified Control.Concurrent.MVar as MV import qualified Control.Concurrent as CC import qualified Control.Exception as E main :: IO () main = do -- call this thread "threadA" mvar1 <- MV.newEmptyMVar :: IO (MV.MVar ()) mvar2 <- MV.newEmptyMVar :: IO (MV.MVar ()) _ <- CC.forkIO $ do -- call this thread "threadB" MV.takeMVar mvar1 `E.catch` errorHandler1 putStrLn "after error catch" CC.threadDelay 1000000 MV.putMVar mvar2 () putStrLn "after putMVar" CC.threadDelay 10000000 -- <-- this line is added MV.readMVar mvar2 `E.catch` errorHandler2 putStrLn "after readMVar" CC.threadDelay 5000000 where errorHandler1 :: E.BlockedIndefinitelyOnMVar -> IO () errorHandler1 e = putStrLn $ "errorHandler1 : " ++ show e errorHandler2 :: E.BlockedIndefinitelyOnMVar -> IO () errorHandler2 e = putStrLn $ "errorHandler2 : " ++ show e }}} And it will run correctly (BlockedIndefinitelyOnMVar is not thrown for mvar2). {{{ > runhaskell mvar.hs errorHandler1 : thread blocked indefinitely in an MVar operation after error catch after putMVar after readMVar }}} ---- I found this behavior is same on STM / BlockedIndefinitelyOnSTM. {{{#!hs module Main where import qualified Control.Concurrent.STM as STM import qualified Control.Concurrent as CC import qualified Control.Exception as E main :: IO () main = do tmv1 <- STM.newEmptyTMVarIO :: IO (STM.TMVar ()) tmv2 <- STM.newEmptyTMVarIO :: IO (STM.TMVar ()) _ <- CC.forkIO $ do STM.atomically (STM.takeTMVar tmv1) `E.catch` errorHandler1 putStrLn "after error catch" CC.threadDelay 1000000 STM.atomically $ STM.putTMVar tmv2 () putStrLn "after putTMVar" STM.atomically (STM.readTMVar tmv2) `E.catch` errorHandler2 putStrLn "after readTMVar" CC.threadDelay 5000000 where errorHandler1 :: E.BlockedIndefinitelyOnSTM -> IO () errorHandler1 e = putStrLn $ "errorHandler1 : " ++ show e errorHandler2 :: E.BlockedIndefinitelyOnSTM -> IO () errorHandler2 e = putStrLn $ "errorHandler2 : " ++ show e }}} {{{ > runhaskell stm.hs errorHandler1 : thread blocked indefinitely in an STM transaction errorHandler2 : thread blocked indefinitely in an STM transaction after error catch after readTMVar after putTMVar }}} ---- I tested this in below versions/OSs and got same result (exception thrown for mvar2/tmv2). ghc7.8.3 on Windows7 ghc7.8.3 on lubuntu14.04 on VirtualBox on Windows7 ghc7.8.4 on lubuntu14.04 on VirtualBox on Windows7 ghc7.10.1 on lubuntu14.04 on VirtualBox on Windows7 Similar report https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/8804 found but not the same. (In this case, the reference to the MVar is not weak) -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/10241> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 7

[GHC] #9640: Invalid object in processHeapClosureForDead(): 2130762223
by GHC 19 May '18

19 May '18

#9640: Invalid object in processHeapClosureForDead(): 2130762223 -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: Fuuzetsu | Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: Compiler | Version: 7.8.3 Keywords: | Operating System: Architecture: Unknown/Multiple | Unknown/Multiple Difficulty: Unknown | Type of failure: Blocked By: | None/Unknown Related Tickets: | Test Case: | Blocking: | Differential Revisions: -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- I just tried using {{{-hb}}} profiling for Yi and hit {{{ yi: internal error: Invalid object in processHeapClosureForDead(): 2130762223 (GHC version 7.8.3 for x86_64_unknown_linux) Please report this as a GHC bug: http://www.haskell.org/ghc/reportabug Aborted }}} Unfortunately I don't have an easy way to replicate. In my case it's to check out HEAD version of Yi, build with profiling and run {{{ [nix-shell:~/programming/yi/yi]$ TERM=xterm yi_datadir=. dist/build/yi/yi -fpango --as=emacs -y /tmp /tmp/long +RTS -p -hb }}} where {{{/tmp/long}}} here is just a file with 1MB of the letter {{{A}}} repeated on a single line. -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/9640> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 4

[GHC] #9840: Permit empty closed type families
by GHC 18 May '18

18 May '18

#9840: Permit empty closed type families -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: adamgundry | Owner: Type: feature request | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: Compiler (Type | Version: 7.8.3 checker) | Operating System: Keywords: | Unknown/Multiple Architecture: Unknown/Multiple | Type of failure: Difficulty: Unknown | None/Unknown Blocked By: | Test Case: Related Tickets: | Blocking: | Differential Revisions: -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- At the moment, closed type families without any equations fail with a parse error. In addition, they cannot be created by TH (see #8028). Would it be possible to permit these instead? My use case is in my typechecker plugin for units of measure, where I want to add new type-level operators without any equational theory (because it will be supplied by the plugin) and without users having the ability to introduce their own type family instances. -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/9840> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 13