January 2016 - ghc-tickets

[GHC] #10016: UNPACK support for existentials
by GHC 03 Apr '18

03 Apr '18

#10016: UNPACK support for existentials -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: simonpj | Owner: Type: feature | Status: new request | Milestone: Priority: normal | Version: 7.8.4 Component: Compiler | Operating System: Unknown/Multiple Keywords: | Type of failure: None/Unknown Architecture: | Blocked By: Unknown/Multiple | Related Tickets: Test Case: | Blocking: | Differential Revisions: | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Consider {{{ data Foo = forall a. Show a => Foo !a !a data Bar = Bar {-# UNPACK #-} !Foo }}} The UNPACK pragma should really be able to unpack the `Foo` field, so that (implementation-wise) it would be as if you'd declared `Bar` thus: {{{ data Bar = forall a. Show a => Bar !a !a }}} But currently we get {{{ Ignoring unusable UNPACK pragma on the first argument of ‘Bar’ }}} Suggested by Nicholas Clarke [https://www.haskell.org/pipermail/glasgow- haskell-users/2015-January/025590.html here]. Vaguely related tickets: #7647, #9214. But unlike those ones, this one looks quite feasible to me. -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/10016> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 6

[GHC] #11186: Give strong preference to type variable names in scope when reporting hole contexts
by GHC 02 Apr '18

02 Apr '18

#11186: Give strong preference to type variable names in scope when reporting hole contexts -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: dfeuer | Owner: Type: feature | Status: new request | Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: Compiler | Version: 7.10.2 (Type checker) | Keywords: typed-holes | Operating System: Unknown/Multiple Architecture: | Type of failure: None/Unknown Unknown/Multiple | Test Case: | Blocked By: Blocking: | Related Tickets: Differential Rev(s): | Wiki Page: -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- When using `ScopedTypeVariables` with typed holes, I want GHC to bend over backwards to preserve the names of type variables that the user has chosen to bring into scope. I can't immediately reproduce the situations I've run into recently where that hasn't happened, but sometimes I've had a signature like {{{#!hs foo :: forall bar . ... foo = ... _ ... }}} and yet the typed hole message shows that `bar` has been lost in unification and replaced by some unrelated name. I would very much prefer if this never happened. -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/11186> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 9

[GHC] #10954: Add class/context information to typed hole relevant bindings
by GHC 02 Apr '18

02 Apr '18

#10954: Add class/context information to typed hole relevant bindings -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: dfeuer | Owner: Type: feature | Status: new request | Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: Compiler | Version: 7.10.2 (Type checker) | Keywords: | Operating System: Unknown/Multiple Architecture: | Type of failure: None/Unknown Unknown/Multiple | Test Case: | Blocked By: Blocking: | Related Tickets: #9479 Differential Rev(s): | Wiki Page: -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- GHC's typed hole messages don't currently include any known context information for relevant bindings. For example: {{{#!hs bar :: a ~ b => a -> b -> Int bar x y = _ }}} gets me {{{ Found hole ‘_’ with type: Int Relevant bindings include y :: b (bound at <interactive>:8:42) x :: a (bound at <interactive>:8:40) bar :: a -> b -> Int (bound at <interactive>:8:36) In the expression: _ In an equation for ‘bar’: bar x y = _ }}} The types `a` and `b` are not unified, and the `a ~ b` constraint is not shown. {{{#!hs foo :: Show a => a -> Int foo x = _ }}} gets me {{{ Found hole ‘_’ with type: Int Relevant bindings include x :: a (bound at <interactive>:4:36) foo :: a -> Int (bound at <interactive>:4:32) In the expression: _ In an equation for ‘foo’: foo x = _ }}} The `Show` constraint is lost. === What I want === I'd like context information for all type variables in known bindings, so I can see all the pieces available to help me fill in the hole. === Related ticket === In #9479, Dominique Devriese wants to see any constraints ''on'' an ambiguously-typed hole. -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/10954> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 3

[GHC] #10267: Add support for typed holes in Template Haskell
by GHC 02 Apr '18

02 Apr '18

#10267: Add support for typed holes in Template Haskell -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: jstolarek | Owner: Type: feature | Status: new request | Milestone: Priority: normal | Version: 7.10.1 Component: Template | Operating System: Unknown/Multiple Haskell | Type of failure: None/Unknown Keywords: | Blocked By: Architecture: | Related Tickets: Unknown/Multiple | Test Case: | Blocking: | Differential Revisions: | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- I want to be able to work with typed holes using Template Haskell. These are currently rejected: {{{#!hs [d| i :: a -> a i x = _ |] }}} {{{ Expression form not (yet) handled by Template Haskell _ }}} -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/10267> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 11

[GHC] #10822: GHC inconsistently handles \\?\ for long paths on Windows
by GHC 31 Mar '18

31 Mar '18

#10822: GHC inconsistently handles \\?\ for long paths on Windows -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: snoyberg | Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: Compiler | Version: 7.10.2 Keywords: | Operating System: Windows Architecture: | Type of failure: None/Unknown Unknown/Multiple | Test Case: | Blocked By: Blocking: | Related Tickets: Differential Revisions: | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- To demonstrate what I mean first: {{{ >ghc-pkg init \\?\c:\Users\michael\Desktop\some-pkg-db >dir \\?\c:\Users\Michael\Desktop\some-pkg-db Volume in drive \\?\c: is Windows8_OS Volume Serial Number is CEF7-874D Directory of \\?\c:\Users\Michael\Desktop\some-pkg-db 09/01/2015 09:38 AM <DIR> . 09/01/2015 09:38 AM <DIR> .. 09/01/2015 09:38 AM 40 package.cache 1 File(s) 40 bytes 2 Dir(s) 5,907,509,248 bytes free >ghc -package-db \\?\c:\Users\Michael\Desktop\some-pkg-db ghc: can't find a package database at \\?\c:\Users\Michael\Desktop\some- pkg-db }}} The problem: on Windows by default, paths are limited to 260 characters, which can become a real problem in practice when dealing with the standard library path hierarchy the Cabal library uses and any package with a decent name length. This was a real problem in practice, see: https://github.com/haskell/cabal/issues/2502 Windows has a workaround for this: you can prefix an absolute path with \\?\, see: https://msdn.microsoft.com/en- us/library/windows/desktop/aa365247%28v=vs.85%29.aspx#maxpath It would be very useful if such paths worked with GHC, but currently they do not. I don't yet know how deep the problem is. -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/10822> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 6

[GHC] #9406: unexpected failure for T7837(profasm)
by GHC 29 Mar '18

29 Mar '18

#9406: unexpected failure for T7837(profasm) -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: jrp | Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: low | Milestone: Component: Test Suite | Version: 7.8.3 Keywords: T7837 | Operating System: MacOS X Architecture: x86_64 (amd64) | Type of failure: Incorrect Difficulty: Unknown | result at runtime Blocked By: | Test Case: T7837 Related Tickets: | Blocking: | Differential Revisions: -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- This may be a test suite configuration error as the normal case works. When run with an llvm-perf build of the HEAD, I get: {{{ =====> T7837(normal) 1395 of 4068 [0, 0, 0] cd ./indexed-types/should_compile && '/Users/jrp/Projects/haskell/ghc/inplace/bin/ghc-stage2' -fforce-recomp -dcore-lint -dcmm-lint -dno-debug-output -no-user-package-db -rtsopts -fno-ghci-history -c T7837.hs -O -ddump-rule-firings >T7837.comp.stderr 2>&1 =====> T7837(profasm) 1395 of 4068 [0, 0, 0] cd ./indexed-types/should_compile && '/Users/jrp/Projects/haskell/ghc/inplace/bin/ghc-stage2' -fforce-recomp -dcore-lint -dcmm-lint -dno-debug-output -no-user-package-db -rtsopts -fno-ghci-history -c T7837.hs -O -prof -static -auto-all -O -ddump-rule- firings >T7837.comp.stderr 2>&1 Actual stderr output differs from expected: --- ./indexed-types/should_compile/T7837.stderr 2014-08-03 11:36:53.000000000 +0100 +++ ./indexed-types/should_compile/T7837.comp.stderr 2014-08-04 23:16:34.000000000 +0100 @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@ Rule fired: Class op abs Rule fired: Class op signum Rule fired: normalize/Double +Rule fired: Class op / *** unexpected failure for T7837(profasm) Unexpected results from: TEST="T7837" OVERALL SUMMARY for test run started at Mon Aug 4 23:16:32 2014 BST 0:00:02 spent to go through 4068 total tests, which gave rise to 19536 test cases, of which 19534 were skipped 0 had missing libraries 1 expected passes 0 expected failures 0 caused framework failures 0 unexpected passes 1 unexpected failures Unexpected failures: indexed-types/should_compile T7837 [stderr mismatch] (profasm) }}} -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/9406> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 8

[GHC] #10536: Clear up how to turn off dynamic linking in build.mk
by GHC 26 Mar '18

26 Mar '18

#10536: Clear up how to turn off dynamic linking in build.mk -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: thomie | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: 7.12.1 Component: Build | Version: 7.10.1 System | Operating System: Unknown/Multiple Keywords: | Type of failure: None/Unknown Architecture: | Blocked By: Unknown/Multiple | Related Tickets: Test Case: | Blocking: | Differential Revisions: | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- See https://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-devs/2014-December/007725.html -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/10536> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 8

[GHC] #11188: Confusing "parse error in pattern" for missing indentation.
by GHC 26 Mar '18

26 Mar '18

#11188: Confusing "parse error in pattern" for missing indentation. -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: andreas.abel | Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: high | Milestone: Component: Compiler | Version: 7.10.1 (Parser) | Keywords: | Operating System: Unknown/Multiple Architecture: | Type of failure: Other Unknown/Multiple | Test Case: | Blocked By: Blocking: | Related Tickets: Differential Rev(s): | Wiki Page: -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- The following problem exists at least in ghc 7.4.2 through 7.10.1: {{{#!hs main = do putStrLn "Hello, lots of crap" $ do a <- return 3 -- The following line is mis-indented, the error is incomprehensible c <- do return 5 }}} Error: {{{ <file>:2:3: Parse error in pattern: putStrLn Possibly caused by a missing 'do'? }}} The hint about "missing do" exists from ghc 7.8, but is wrong in this case. Problematic about this bug is that the wrong indentation can be arbitrary many lines from where ghc reports the (totally incomprehensible) error. My original problem is to find the syntax error here: {{{#!hs -- | Type check a function clause. checkClause :: Type -> A.SpineClause -> TCM Clause checkClause t c(a)(A.Clause (A.SpineLHS i x aps withPats) rhs0 wh) = do unless (null withPats) $ do typeError $ UnexpectedWithPatterns withPats traceCall (CheckClause t c) $ do aps <- expandPatternSynonyms aps checkLeftHandSide (CheckPatternShadowing c) (Just x) aps t $ \ (LHSResult delta ps trhs perm) -> do -- Note that we might now be in irrelevant context, -- in case checkLeftHandSide walked over an irrelevant projection pattern. -- As we will be type-checking the @rhs@ in @delta@, but the final -- body should have bindings in the order of the pattern variables, -- we need to apply the permutation to the checked rhs @v@. let mkBody v = foldr (\ x t -> Bind $ Abs x t) b xs where b = Body $ applySubst (renamingR perm) v xs = [ stringToArgName $ "h" ++ show n | n <- [0..permRange perm - 1] ] -- introduce trailing implicits for checking the where decls TelV htel t0 <- telViewUpTo' (-1) (not . visible) $ unArg trhs (body, with) <- do let n = size htel addCtxTel htel $ checkWhere (size delta + n) wh $ -- for the body, we remove the implicits again escapeContext n $ handleRHS aps (unArgs trhs) rhs0 escapeContext (size delta) $ checkWithFunction with reportSDoc "tc.lhs.top" 10 $ escapeContext (size delta) $ vcat [ text "Clause before translation:" , nest 2 $ vcat [ text "delta =" <+> prettyTCM delta , text "perm =" <+> text (show perm) , text "ps =" <+> text (show ps) , text "body =" <+> text (show body) , text "body =" <+> prettyTCM body ] ] return $ Clause { clauseRange = getRange i , clauseTel = killRange delta , clausePerm = perm , namedClausePats = ps , clauseBody = body , clauseType = Just trhs } }}} {{{ src/full/Agda/TypeChecking/Rules/Def.hs:328:5: Parse error in pattern: checkLeftHandSide Possibly caused by a missing 'do'? }}} -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/11188> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 9

[GHC] #11472: Remove CallStack CPP guards in GHC 8.2
by GHC 19 Mar '18

19 Mar '18

#11472: Remove CallStack CPP guards in GHC 8.2 -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: bgamari | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: 8.2.1 Component: Compiler | Version: 7.10.3 Keywords: | Operating System: Unknown/Multiple Architecture: | Type of failure: None/Unknown Unknown/Multiple | Test Case: | Blocked By: Blocking: | Related Tickets: Differential Rev(s): | Wiki Page: -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- GHC 7.10.1 didn't support `CallStack`, while its successors did. Yet in post-8.0 `master` (which needs to be buildable with the 7.10 series, including 7.10.1) references to CallStack have begun to sneak in to GHC. The first instance of this was 9d33adb6f352ad4e488067a8756928b3778920e0 but there will likely be more. I've fixed in this instance in Phab:D1812 by adding `#if` guards. These should be removed in GHC 8.2. -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/11472> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 7

[GHC] #10933: REMOVED pragma
by GHC 19 Mar '18

19 Mar '18

#10933: REMOVED pragma -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: goldfire | Owner: Type: feature | Status: new request | Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: Compiler | Version: 7.10.2 Keywords: | Operating System: Unknown/Multiple Architecture: | Type of failure: None/Unknown Unknown/Multiple | Test Case: | Blocked By: Blocking: | Related Tickets: Differential Rev(s): | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Say I have a function that's been deprecated for some time. Then I remove it. Some clients will still use the now-missing function. It would be nice to give a helpful error message, instead of a "symbol not found" error. I thus propose a `REMOVED` pragma. The syntax is identical to `DEPRECATED`, except for the name of the pragma. Whenever a `REMOVED` function is mentioned, the error message includes the string from the pragma. (This includes trying to define a `REMOVED` class method in an instance.) See Design/DeprecationMechanisms for more info and related efforts. -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/10933> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 3