January 2016 - ghc-tickets

[GHC] #9577: String literals are wasting space
by GHC 15 Aug '17

15 Aug '17

#9577: String literals are wasting space -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: xnyhps | Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: low | Milestone: Component: Compiler (NCG) | Version: 7.8.2 Keywords: | Operating System: Architecture: Unknown/Multiple | Unknown/Multiple Difficulty: Unknown | Type of failure: Runtime Blocked By: | performance bug Related Tickets: | Test Case: | Blocking: | Differential Revisions: -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- For [https://phabricator.haskell.org/D199 D199] I looked into how string literals are compiled down by GHC. On 64-bit OS X, a simple string `"AAA"` turns into assembly: {{{ .const .align 3 .align 0 c38E_str: .byte 65 .byte 65 .byte 65 .byte 0 }}} (And also something that invokes `unpackCString#`, but that isn't relevant here.) (`MkCore.mkStringExprFS` -> `CmmUtils.mkByteStringCLit` -> `compiler/nativeGen/X86/Ppr.pprSectionHeader`.) Note how this: * Is 8 byte aligned. * Is a `.const` section. I can't find any reason why string literals would need to be 8-byte aligned on OS X. There might be a small benefit in performance to read data starting 8-byte aligned, but I doubt doing that for string literals would be a meaningful difference. Assembly from both clang and gcc does not align string literals. The trivial program: {{{#!hs main :: IO () main = return () }}} has almost 5kB of wasted space of padding between all strings the Prelude brings in, built with GHC HEAD. The fact that it is a `.const` section, instead of `.cstring` (https://developer.apple.com/library/mac/documentation/DeveloperTools/Refere…) means duplicate strings aren't shared by the assembler. GHC floats out string literals to the top-level and uses CSE to eliminate duplicates, but that only works in a single modules. Strings shared between different modules end up as duplicate strings in an executable. The same program as above also has ~4kB of wasted space due to duplicate Prelude strings (`"base"` occurs 16 times!). Compared to the total binary size (4MB after stripping), removing this redundant data wouldn't be a big improvement (0.2%), but I still think it can be a worthwile optimization. I think this can be solved quite easily by creating a new section header for literal strings, which is unaligned and of type `.cstring`. -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/9577> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 26

[GHC] #10922: String inlining is inconsistent
by GHC 15 Aug '17

15 Aug '17

#10922: String inlining is inconsistent -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: xnyhps | Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: Compiler | Version: 7.10.1 Keywords: | Operating System: Unknown/Multiple Architecture: x86_64 | Type of failure: Runtime (amd64) | performance bug Test Case: | Blocked By: Blocking: | Related Tickets: Differential Rev(s): | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- I have the following code: A.hs: {{{#!hs module A where foo :: String {-# INLINE foo #-} foo = "foo" }}} B.hs: {{{#!hs import A main = if foo == "foo" then return () else putStrLn "Wrong" }}} Compiling this with `-O2` shows the if-statement has not been eliminated (`"Wrong"` is still part of the output with `-ddump-simpl`). However, if I rewrite the code to: A.hs: {{{#!hs module A where foo :: () -> String {-# INLINE foo #-} foo () = "foo" }}} B.hs: {{{#!hs import A main = if foo () == "foo" then return () else putStrLn "Wrong" }}} Then the if-statement disappears and the generated Core has no string literals left. Even when the literal can not be eliminated from B it seems GHC is fine with duplicating it accross two modules if it occurs somewhere inside a function. But once I make it a top-level expression of type `String`, inlining it does not happen. I can not think of how this could be working as intended. (The case where `A.foo` is `""` seems to work differently, but also does not get optimized away.) (This happened to me when rewriting some code that previously used `CPP` for conditional compilation to using `if System.Info.os == "darwin" then ... else ...` and expecting the other OS cases to get optimized away.) -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/10922> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 1

[GHC] #10809: Add prefetch{Small}{Mutable}Array[0..3]#
by GHC 15 Aug '17

15 Aug '17

#10809: Add prefetch{Small}{Mutable}Array[0..3]# -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: ekmett | Owner: simonmar Type: feature | Status: new request | Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: Runtime | Version: 7.10.2 System | Keywords: | Operating System: Unknown/Multiple Architecture: | Type of failure: Runtime Unknown/Multiple | performance bug Test Case: | Blocked By: Blocking: | Related Tickets: Differential Revisions: | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- We now have a number of prefetch operations: {{{ prefetchAddr0# prefetchMutableByteArray0# prefetchAddr1# prefetchMutableByteArray1# prefetchAddr2# prefetchMutableByteArray2# prefetchAddr3# prefetchMutableByteArray3# prefetchByteArray0# prefetchValue0# prefetchByteArray1# prefetchValue1# prefetchByteArray2# prefetchValue2# prefetchByteArray3# prefetchValue3# }}} but we are missing variants for fetching slots of a `{Small}{Mutable}Array#`. This differs from fetching the item pointed to by the entry at that address, so `prefetchValueX` does us no good there. Basically this just needs to compute the offset of the appropriate slot and prefetch the memory for that portion of the array as an address like we do indexing into a byte array. I have some code that could benefit a fair bit from being able to prefetch a binary search on array elements this way, when storing those elements either in a traditional sorted order or Eytzinger layout. I've verified this experimentally by unsafeCoercing existing bytearray primitives to make them work on other array types. -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/10809> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 2

[GHC] #8147: Exponential behavior in instance resolution on fixpoint-of-sum
by GHC 07 Aug '17

07 Aug '17

#8147: Exponential behavior in instance resolution on fixpoint-of-sum -------------------------+------------------------------------------------- Reporter: | Owner: jkoppel | Status: new Type: bug | Milestone: Priority: | Version: 7.6.3 normal | Operating System: Unknown/Multiple Component: | Type of failure: Compile-time performance bug Compiler | Test Case: Keywords: | Blocking: performance, | Architecture: | Unknown/Multiple | Difficulty: | Unknown | Blocked By: | Related Tickets: | -------------------------+------------------------------------------------- Doing instance resolution on a fixpoint-of-sum type takes a very long time. This is possibly the same issue as issue #5642. These are the numbers I see for various n: {{{ 10 : 0.329s 20 : 0.479s 40 : 0.935s 80 : 2.821s 160 : 11.694s 320 : 1m30.39s 640: Ran for over 1 hour without terminating }}} This uses a couple of attached support files. Apologies for not being able to reduce further. {{{ -- Test.hs {-# LANGUAGE MultiParamTypeClasses, FlexibleInstances, UndecidableInstances, OverlappingInstances, TypeOperators, DeriveFunctor, TemplateHaskell #-} module Test where import Control.Monad import Lib import TH {- With n=3, produces data X1 e = X1 e deriving (Functor) data X2 e = X2 e deriving (Functor) data X3 e = X3 e deriving (Functor) type X = X1 :+: X2 :+: X3 -} $(let n = 320 in liftM concat $ sequence [liftM concat $ mapM mkDec $ map (('X':).show) [1..n] , makeSumType "X" (map (('X':).show) [1..n])]) data Y0 e = Y0 e deriving ( Functor ) type X' = Y0 :+: X class Lift f g where lift' :: f (Fix g) -> Fix g instance (Lift f g, Lift f' g) => Lift (f :+: f') g where lift' x = case x of L e -> lift' e R e -> lift' e instance (Functor f, f :<: g) => Lift f g where lift' = In . inj cata :: (Functor f) => (f a -> a) -> Fix f -> a cata f = f . fmap (cata f) . out lift :: Fix X -> Fix X' lift = cata lift' }}} Virtually all the time is spent in compiling lift. For example, with n=640, commenting out lift makes it compile in around 2 seconds. Interestingly, when I add the following code, compilation times only increase by 10-20%. In the original code where I encountered this issue, doing so doubles compilation time. {{{ instance Lift Y0 X where lift' = undefined lower :: Fix X' -> Fix X lower = cata lift' }}} -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/8147> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 6

[GHC] #11196: TypeInType performance regressions
by GHC 07 Aug '17

07 Aug '17

#11196: TypeInType performance regressions -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: goldfire | Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: Compiler | Version: 7.10.2 Keywords: | Operating System: Unknown/Multiple Architecture: | Type of failure: None/Unknown Unknown/Multiple | Test Case: | Blocked By: Blocking: | Related Tickets: Differential Rev(s): | Wiki Page: -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- This ticket is to track the handful of performance regressions seen with the addition of `TypeInType`. It is quite possibly a good idea to break these out into separate tickets, but until we investigate, they're all bundled here. The regressions are: * T3064, bytes allocated up by 14.9% (will update description) -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/11196> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 21

[GHC] #9522: SPECIALISE pragmas for derived instances
by GHC 01 Aug '17

01 Aug '17

#9522: SPECIALISE pragmas for derived instances -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: simonpj | Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: Compiler | Version: 7.8.2 Keywords: | Operating System: Architecture: Unknown/Multiple | Unknown/Multiple Difficulty: Unknown | Type of failure: Blocked By: | None/Unknown Related Tickets: | Test Case: | Blocking: | Differential Revisions: -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- In package `ghc-prim`, in `GHC.Classes` we have {{{ instance (Eq a) => Eq [a] where {-# SPECIALISE instance Eq [[Char]] #-} {-# SPECIALISE instance Eq [Char] #-} {-# SPECIALISE instance Eq [Int] #-} [] == [] = True (x:xs) == (y:ys) = x == y && xs == ys _xs == _ys = False }}} The `SPECIALISE instance` pragmas instantiate the code for these commonly- used types. But for tuples we use `deriving`: {{{ deriving instance (Eq a, Eq b) => Eq (a, b) }}} and many more similar. There is no way to add a `SPECIALISE instance` pragma for a derived instance. This is bad, because they are heavily used. It should probably be possible to have a top-level {{{ {-# SPECIALISE instance Eq (Int, Bool) #-} }}} even in another module (as we can now do for functions. To do this right, we'd need to make the code for derived methods `INLINEALBE`. -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/9522> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 4

[GHC] #8827: Inferring Safe mode with GeneralizedNewtypeDeriving is wrong
by GHC 01 Aug '17

01 Aug '17

#8827: Inferring Safe mode with GeneralizedNewtypeDeriving is wrong ------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: goldfire | Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: 7.8.1 Component: Compiler | Version: 7.8.1-rc1 Keywords: | Operating System: Unknown/Multiple Architecture: Unknown/Multiple | Type of failure: None/Unknown Difficulty: Unknown | Test Case: Blocked By: | Blocking: Related Tickets: | ------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Consider the following modules: {{{ module A (List, ints) where data List a = Nil | Cons a (List a) infixr 4 `Cons` ints :: List Int ints = 1 `Cons` 2 `Cons` 3 `Cons` Nil }}} {{{ {-# LANGUAGE GeneralizedNewtypeDeriving #-} module B where import A newtype Age = MkAge Int deriving C class C a where cList :: List a instance C Int where cList = ints }}} {{{ {-# LANGUAGE Safe #-} module C (ages) where import A import B ages :: List Age ages = cList }}} Module C compiles without a hiccup. But, it shouldn't: the coercion between `ages` and `ints` (performed by !GeneralizedNewtypeDeriving in module B) isn't Safe, as it breaks through `List`'s abstraction. (Note that the constructors of `List` are ''not'' exported from module A!) If module B includes `{-# LANGUAGE Safe #-}`, it duly doesn't compile, because of the stringent "constructors-must-be-in-scope" check done by the `Coercible` mechanism. The problem is that safety can be ''inferred'' without this check taking place. You may also want to read the commentary on #8745 for related discussion. -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/8827> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 52

[GHC] #9790: Produce coercion rules for derived Functor instances
by GHC 01 Aug '17

01 Aug '17

#9790: Produce coercion rules for derived Functor instances -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: dfeuer | Owner: Type: feature request | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: Compiler | Version: 7.9 Keywords: coercion | Operating System: Architecture: Unknown/Multiple | Unknown/Multiple Difficulty: Unknown | Type of failure: Runtime Blocked By: | performance bug Related Tickets: | Test Case: | Blocking: | Differential Revisions: -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- I don't ''think'' we do this yet, but I think we probably can. If we derive a `Functor` instance, we should, whenever possible and valid, produce some sort of `fmap coerce = coerce` rule for that type. This is done manually for lists in `GHC.Base`, but I imagine it probably applies (much) more generally. -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/9790> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 5

[GHC] #10598: DeriveAnyClass and GND don't work well together
by GHC 01 Aug '17

01 Aug '17

#10598: DeriveAnyClass and GND don't work well together -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: osa1 | Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: Compiler | Version: 7.11 Keywords: | Operating System: Unknown/Multiple Architecture: | Type of failure: None/Unknown Unknown/Multiple | Blocked By: Test Case: | Related Tickets: Blocking: | Differential Revisions: | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- I think we definitely have a bug here, but I'm not sure what it really is. Here's the program: {{{ newtype MyMaybe a = MyMaybe (Maybe a) deriving (Functor, Show) main = print $ MyMaybe $ Just (10 :: Int) }}} I'm using GHC 7.10.1. {{{ ➜ deriveany_bug ghc --make -fforce-recomp Test.hs -XDeriveAnyClass -XGeneralizedNewtypeDeriving [1 of 1] Compiling Main ( Test.hs, Test.o ) Test.hs:2:13: Can't make a derived instance of ‘Functor MyMaybe’ (even with cunning newtype deriving): You need DeriveFunctor to derive an instance for this class Try GeneralizedNewtypeDeriving for GHC's newtype-deriving extension In the newtype declaration for ‘MyMaybe’ }}} Just to try, changing argument order: {{{ ➜ deriveany_bug ghc --make -fforce-recomp Test.hs -XGeneralizedNewtypeDeriving -XDeriveAnyClass [1 of 1] Compiling Main ( Test.hs, Test.o ) Test.hs:2:13: Can't make a derived instance of ‘Functor MyMaybe’ (even with cunning newtype deriving): You need DeriveFunctor to derive an instance for this class Try GeneralizedNewtypeDeriving for GHC's newtype-deriving extension In the newtype declaration for ‘MyMaybe’ }}} It works fine if I remove `DeriveAnyClass`: {{{ ➜ deriveany_bug ghc --make -fforce-recomp Test.hs -XGeneralizedNewtypeDeriving [1 of 1] Compiling Main ( Test.hs, Test.o ) Linking Test ... }}} GHC HEAD is failing in exactly the same way. User manual is saying this in 7.5.6: > In case you try to derive some class on a newtype, and -XGeneralizedNewtypeDeriving is also on, -XDeriveAnyClass takes precedence. But then why is it telling me to enable `GeneralizedNewtypeDeriving` in the error message? Even if I already enabled it? Also, maybe it could try `GND` when `DeriveAnyClass` fails? Because the doc is saying `DeriveAnyClass` has precedence but doesn't specify what happens if it fails. -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/10598> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 55

[GHC] #10938: DeriveAnyClass + deriving Bifunctor causes GHC panic
by GHC 01 Aug '17

01 Aug '17

#10938: DeriveAnyClass + deriving Bifunctor causes GHC panic -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: erantapaa | Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: Compiler | Version: 7.10.2 Keywords: | Operating System: MacOS X DeriveAnyClass | Architecture: x86_64 | Type of failure: Compile-time (amd64) | crash Test Case: | Blocked By: Blocking: | Related Tickets: Differential Rev(s): | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Attempting the derive Bifunctor with DeriveAnyClass caused this message from GHC: {{{ $ ghc Foo.hs [1 of 1] Compiling Foo ( Foo.hs, Foo.o ) Var/Type length mismatch: [a_an7, b_an8] [] Var/Type length mismatch: [a_an7, b_an8] [] Var/Type length mismatch: [a_an7, b_an8] [] Foo.hs:8:13:ghc: panic! (the 'impossible' happened) (GHC version 7.10.2 for x86_64-apple-darwin): tcTyVarDetails a_an7 Please report this as a GHC bug: http://www.haskell.org/ghc/reportabug }}} The code: {{{#!hs {-# LANGUAGE DeriveAnyClass #-} module Foo where import Data.Bifunctor data Blah a b = A a | B b deriving (Bifunctor) }}} -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/10938> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 4