January 2016 - ghc-tickets

[GHC] #10940: Random number chosen by openTempFile is always 1804289383846930886
by GHC 26 Feb '17

26 Feb '17

#10940: Random number chosen by openTempFile is always 1804289383846930886 -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: andersk | Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: | Version: 7.10.2 libraries/base | Keywords: | Operating System: Linux Architecture: | Type of failure: Incorrect result Unknown/Multiple | at runtime Test Case: | Blocked By: Blocking: | Related Tickets: Differential Rev(s): | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- {{{#!hs import System.Directory import System.IO main = do (p, _) <- openTempFile "/tmp" "" print p removeFile p }}} {{{#!console $ runghc temp.hs "/tmp/1804289383846930886" $ runghc temp.hs "/tmp/1804289383846930886" $ runghc temp.hs "/tmp/1804289383846930886" $ runghc temp.hs "/tmp/1804289383846930886" }}} This “random” number is the concatenation of the first two numbers 1804289383, 846930886 returned by glibc’s `rand()` when not seeded (or seeded with 1). This is not immediately a library security bug, I think: the file is created with `O_EXCL`, and if it already exists, `openTempFile` will move onto the next value 16816927771714636915, and so on. However, the predictable filenames make a potential application security bug that much more likely. (For your amusement, [https://www.google.com/search?q=1804289383846930886 Google 1804289383846930886].) -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/10940> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 5

[GHC] #10343: Make Typeable track kind information better
by GHC 22 Feb '17

22 Feb '17

#10343: Make Typeable track kind information better -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: oerjan | Owner: Type: feature | Status: new request | Milestone: Priority: normal | Version: 7.10.1 Component: Compiler | Operating System: Unknown/Multiple Keywords: | Type of failure: None/Unknown Architecture: | Blocked By: Unknown/Multiple | Related Tickets: 9858 Test Case: typeOf :: | Typeable (a::k) => Proxy a -> | TypeRep | Blocking: | Differential Revisions: | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- With all the apparent exploitable bugs now fixed, #9858 seems to be settling down. Simon P.J. asked me to make a new ticket for some quibbles I still have with limitations of the new design. These started with some examples that I discussed there pre-implementation with Richard Eisenberg, and which he concluded could be supported by a "sufficently smart solver". In the new (current) design, a `TypeRep` ''does'' contain kind information, which as I understand it is a list of `KindRep`s for the explicit kind parameters applied to the type constructor after type inference. This is sufficient to prevent confusing the same type constructor used at different kinds, and also easily supports type application ''provided'' the `TypeRep`s of the parts are known. For this, the internal `Typeable` constraint solver only ever needs to combine `TypeRep`s, never decompose them. Since no one else complained in #9858, I assume this is enough for what people are currently using `Typeable` for. However: I think the current `TypeRep` representation for `Typeable (a :: k)` doesn't contain enough information to generally extract the `KindRep` for `k` itself, much less to decompose it, even if the internal `Typeable` solver were to try. This prevents some polykinded code that is intuitively sound, and which "worked" in the old system, although if only because it didn't try to track kinds at all. For example, the following expression, with `PolyKinds` enabled: {{{#!hs typeOf :: Typeable a => Proxy a -> TypeRep }}} In the old system, this worked simply by combining the `TypeRep` for `Proxy` with the `TypeRep` for `a`. But in the new system, it fails, because the `TypeRep` for `Proxy` needs to know the kind of `a`, which is neither statically known nor available from the `TypeRep` of `a`. You would need to have compile-time information about the type constructor of `a` to even know how to build the `KindRep` from the kind arguments. This problem with constructing `TypeRep`s would arise whenever a polykinded type constructor is applied to a type whose kind is not a known monomorphic one. The second similar one I can think of is {{{#!hs typeRep :: Typeable a => Proxy (Typeable a) -> TypeRep }}} In an ideal system, we can also find use cases that require not just extracting the `KindRep` for a type, but also decomposing it. Here is my very hypothetical kitchen sink example from [comment:46:ticket:9858] (this example was made up as a test case before I knew what the new solver would support): {{{#!hs {-# LANGUAGE PolyKinds #-} {-# LANGUAGE DataKinds #-} {-# LANGUAGE KindSignatures #-} {-# LANGUAGE AutoDeriveTypeable #-} import Data.Typeable newtype C a b = C () step :: Proxy (a :: [k] -> *) -> Proxy (C a :: [k -> *] -> *) step Proxy = Proxy nest :: Typeable (a :: [k] -> *) => Int -> Proxy a -> TypeRep nest 0 x = typeRep x nest n x = nest (n-1) (step x) main = print $ nest 10 (Proxy :: Proxy (C () :: [()] -> *)) }}} Here, to make this compile, the solver would need to derive `Typeable (C a :: [k -> *] -> *]` from `Typeable (a :: [k] -> *)`, which at runtime requires first extracting the `KindRep` of `k` from the `TypeRep` of `a`, and then building the `TypeRep` for the correctly kinded `C`. At least the former part seems essentially impossible with the current `TypeRep` representation, even with a more clever solver. -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/10343> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 38

[GHC] #11011: Type-indexed TypeReps, Static Pointers and Distributed Closures
by GHC 21 Feb '17

21 Feb '17

#11011: Type-indexed TypeReps, Static Pointers and Distributed Closures -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: bjmprice | Owner: Type: feature | Status: new request | Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: Compiler | Version: Keywords: | Operating System: Unknown/Multiple Architecture: | Type of failure: None/Unknown Unknown/Multiple | Test Case: | Blocked By: Blocking: | Related Tickets: Differential Rev(s): | Wiki Page: -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- There is a mock-up of a new API for type indexed type representations, basic Dynamic functionality, static pointers and distributed closures (https://github.com/brprice/typeableT) based on https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/TypeableT. We would like to invite comments and discussion from the community using this ticket as a more permenant home that email. One particular point that would benefit from more eyes is the polymorphic static pointers support. -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/11011> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 52

[GHC] #9432: IncoherentInstances are too restricted
by GHC 16 Feb '17

16 Feb '17

#9432: IncoherentInstances are too restricted -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: danilo2 | Owner: Type: feature request | Status: new Priority: high | Milestone: Component: Compiler (Type | Version: 7.8.2 checker) | Operating System: Keywords: | Unknown/Multiple Architecture: Unknown/Multiple | Type of failure: Difficulty: Unknown | None/Unknown Blocked By: | Test Case: Related Tickets: | Blocking: | Differential Revisions: -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Hello! The reason behind using `IncoherentInstances`is that we want GHC to commit to a specific instance even if after instantiation of some variables, other instance could be more specific (http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/7.0.4/html/users_guide/type-class- extensions.html). There is one problem though. Lets consider following example (which could not make much sense, but shows the problem well): {{{#!haskell {-# OPTIONS_GHC -fno-warn-missing-methods #-} {-# LANGUAGE NoMonomorphismRestriction #-} {-# LANGUAGE FlexibleInstances #-} {-# LANGUAGE PolyKinds #-} {-# LANGUAGE DeriveDataTypeable #-} {-# LANGUAGE TypeFamilies #-} {-# LANGUAGE IncoherentInstances #-} {-# LANGUAGE ScopedTypeVariables #-} module Main where import Data.Typeable -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Type classes -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- class InferType a where inferType :: Proxy a -> Proxy a inferType = undefined -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Proxy datatypes -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- data Id0 = Id0 deriving (Show, Typeable) data Id1 t1 = Id1 deriving (Show, Typeable) data Id2 t1 t2 = Id2 deriving (Show, Typeable) data Id3 t1 t2 t3 = Id3 deriving (Show, Typeable) data Id4 t1 t2 t3 t4 = Id4 deriving (Show, Typeable) data Id5 t1 t2 t3 t4 t5 = Id5 deriving (Show, Typeable) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Instances -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- instance InferType Int instance (InferType m, InferType a) => InferType (m a) instance (a~Id0) => InferType (a :: *) instance (a~Id1) => InferType (a :: * -> *) instance (a~Id2) => InferType (a :: * -> * -> *) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Tests -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- toProxy :: a -> Proxy a toProxy _ = Proxy --inferTypeBase :: a -> Proxy a inferTypeBase a = inferType $ toProxy a instance InferType Foo1 instance InferType Foo2 tm _ = 5 data Foo1 a = Foo1 a deriving (Show, Typeable) data Foo2 a b = Foo2 a b deriving (Show, Typeable) instance Monad Id1 -- dummy instances just for tests instance Num Id0 main = do print $ typeOf $ inferType $ toProxy $ (return (5)) print $ typeOf $ inferType $ toProxy $ (5) print $ typeOf $ inferType $ toProxy $ (Foo1 (return 5)) print $ typeOf $ inferType $ toProxy $ (Foo2 (return 5) (return 5)) print "hello" ---- OUTPUT: -- Proxy (Id1 Id0) -- Proxy Id0 -- Proxy (Foo1 (Id1 Id0)) -- Proxy (Foo2 (Id1 Id0) (Id1 Id0)) -- "hello" }}} The idea is very simple - replace all unknown type variables with known ones. It works great, but the problem appears with the function `inferTypeBase`. It should have type of `a -> Proxy a`, but GHC claims it has got `Id0 -> Proxy Id0`. It is of course caused by enabled `-XIncoherentInstances` flag, but I think GHC should be more liberal here. If it really cannot pick any instance (causing an error using only `OverlappingInstances`), the `IncoherentInstances` should allow it to pick matching one even if more specific could be available after instantianization. But If no error would occur while using `OverlappingInstances`, `IncoherentInstances` should not affect the way it resolves the instances. I think this would make `IncoherentInstances` much more useful than now. Maybe it would be good to just add some options to the flag? -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/9432> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 8

[GHC] #11031: Record Pattern Synonym Cleanup
by GHC 14 Feb '17

14 Feb '17

#11031: Record Pattern Synonym Cleanup -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: mpickering | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: low | Milestone: Component: Compiler | Version: 7.10.2 Keywords: newcomer | Operating System: Unknown/Multiple Architecture: | Type of failure: None/Unknown Unknown/Multiple | Test Case: | Blocked By: Blocking: | Related Tickets: Differential Rev(s): | Wiki Page: -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Ben comments that there are some loose ends with record pattern synonyms. * It's still not clear to me that the free variables produced in rnPatSynBind are correct * Perhaps in the future we want to refactor tc_single to use a function which extends the typechecking environment instead of using setGblEnv * @mpickering's suggested refactoring of RecSelId to RecSelId (Either PatSyn TyCon) Bool described in the comment in TcExpr.hs * There is a TODO in tc_patsyn_finish which should either be clarified so it can be considered actionable, removed, or just fixed The comment from TcExpr was: > I tried to refactor RecSelId to RecSelId [DataCon] Bool but this causes some pain when it comes to the interface files. Next try it is something like RecSelId (Either PatSyn TyCon) Bool with the aim for something better in the future. -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/11031> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 4

[GHC] #9562: Type families + hs-boot files = unsafeCoerce
by GHC 13 Feb '17

13 Feb '17

#9562: Type families + hs-boot files = unsafeCoerce -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: goldfire | Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: Compiler | Version: 7.8.3 Keywords: | Operating System: Architecture: Unknown/Multiple | Unknown/Multiple Difficulty: Unknown | Type of failure: GHC Blocked By: | accepts invalid program Related Tickets: | Test Case: | Blocking: | Differential Revisions: -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Consider the following bundle of modules: A.hs: {{{#!hs {-# LANGUAGE TypeFamilies #-} module A where type family F a b }}} B.hs-boot: {{{#!hs module B where import A oops :: F a b -> a -> b }}} B.hs: {{{#!hs {-# LANGUAGE TypeFamilies #-} module B where import A import C type instance F a b = b oops :: F a b -> a -> b oops = const }}} C.hs: {{{#!hs module C (oops) where import {-# SOURCE #-} B }}} D.hs: {{{#!hs {-# LANGUAGE TypeFamilies #-} module D where import A import C type instance F a b = a unsafeCoerce :: a -> b unsafeCoerce x = oops x x }}} Main.hs: {{{#!hs module Main where import D ( unsafeCoerce ) main = print $ (unsafeCoerce True :: Int) }}} When loading these into GHCi, we quite reasonably get a type family instance overlap error. But, separate compilation leads to disaster: {{{ rae:01:49:47 ~/temp/bug> ghc --version The Glorious Glasgow Haskell Compilation System, version 7.8.3 rae:01:49:49 ~/temp/bug> ghc -c A.hs rae:01:49:53 ~/temp/bug> ghc -c B.hs-boot rae:01:49:58 ~/temp/bug> ghc -c C.hs rae:01:50:09 ~/temp/bug> ghc -c B.hs rae:01:50:13 ~/temp/bug> ghc -c D.hs rae:01:50:17 ~/temp/bug> ghc Main.hs -o Unsafe [6 of 6] Compiling Main ( Main.hs, Main.o ) Linking Unsafe ... rae:01:50:23 ~/temp/bug> ./Unsafe 2882303761534249061 }}} Yikes! Proposed (terrible) solution: hs-boot files '''must''' list all type instance declarations in the corresponding modules. It may also be a good idea to require all normal instance declarations in the hs-boot file as well, because this same trick can be used to introduce incoherence (I think -- haven't tested). This bug persists even if `Main` declares that it is `Safe`. I've attached a tarball of the files for ease of testing. (Credit to Edward Yang and Geoff Mainland, whose discussion provoked the line of inquiry that led to this discovery.) -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/9562> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 15

[GHC] #8405: experiment with using function-sections for linking (for smaller libs and executables)
by GHC 12 Feb '17

12 Feb '17

#8405: experiment with using function-sections for linking (for smaller libs and executables) ------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: carter | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: 7.10.1 Component: Compiler | Version: 7.6.3 Keywords: | Operating System: Unknown/Multiple Architecture: Unknown/Multiple | Type of failure: None/Unknown Difficulty: Unknown | Test Case: Blocked By: | Blocking: Related Tickets: | ------------------------------------+------------------------------------- currently the only support we have for making small (ish) executables using split objects, which 1. is not on by default, for various good reasons 2. can seriously penalize compile times 3. in tandem, something like strip is often used, but on some platforms/targets (such as the iOS cross compiler), strip will actually break things might be worth seriously experimenting with function-sections / gc- sections in the object files we generate. example slide deck on this http://elinux.org/images/2/2d/ELC2010-gc- sections_Denys_Vlasenko.pdf -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/8405> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 21

[GHC] #9821: DeriveAnyClass support for higher-kinded classes + some more comments
by GHC 10 Feb '17

10 Feb '17

#9821: DeriveAnyClass support for higher-kinded classes + some more comments -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: dreixel | Owner: dreixel Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: 7.10.1 Component: Compiler | Version: 7.9 Keywords: | Operating System: Architecture: Unknown/Multiple | Unknown/Multiple Difficulty: Unknown | Type of failure: Blocked By: | None/Unknown Related Tickets: #5462 | Test Case: | Blocking: | Differential Revisions: -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- #5462 was merged before a few final fixes were done. This ticket serves to record that. Left to address are: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D476?id=1443#inline-3652 https://phabricator.haskell.org/D476?id=1443#inline-3648 https://phabricator.haskell.org/D476?id=1443#inline-3646 Also, `DeriveAnyClass` currently panics at higher-kinded classes (like `((* -> *) -> *) -> Constraint`). I'll fix this. -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/9821> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 13

[GHC] #10626: Missed opportunity for SpecConstr
by GHC 10 Feb '17

10 Feb '17

#10626: Missed opportunity for SpecConstr -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: simonpj | Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: Compiler | Version: 7.10.1 Keywords: | Operating System: Unknown/Multiple Architecture: | Type of failure: None/Unknown Unknown/Multiple | Blocked By: Test Case: | Related Tickets: Blocking: | Differential Revisions: | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Look at `perf/should_run/T4830`. After `SpecConstr` and optimisation we finally get {{{ Rec { Main.foo_$s$wfoo1 [Occ=LoopBreaker] :: Int# -> Double -> Double -> Double# [GblId, Arity=3, Caf=NoCafRefs, Str=DmdType <L,1*U><L,U><L,U>] Main.foo_$s$wfoo1 = \ (sc_s4eN :: Int#) (sc1_s4eO :: Double) (sc2_s4eP :: Double) -> case sc_s4eN of ds_X1SR { __DEFAULT -> case sc1_s4eO of wild_a1Tf { D# x_a1Th -> case sc2_s4eP of wild1_a1Tj { D# y_a1Tl -> case tagToEnum# @ Bool (<=## x_a1Th y_a1Tl) of _ [Occ=Dead] { False -> Main.foo_$s$wfoo1 (-# ds_X1SR 1#) wild1_a1Tj wild_a1Tf; True -> Main.foo_$s$wfoo1 (-# ds_X1SR 1#) wild_a1Tf wild1_a1Tj } } }; 0# -> case sc1_s4eO of _ [Occ=Dead] { D# x_a1UL -> case sc2_s4eP of _ [Occ=Dead] { D# y_a1UP -> +## x_a1UL y_a1UP } } } end Rec } }}} If we ran `SpecConstr` again we'd specialise this function, because the recursive calls both have boxed arguments. I looked into why `SpecConstr` didn't catch it, and it's because `SpecConstr`'s input looks like this {{{ case case tagToEnum# @ Bool (<=## x_a1Th y_a1Tl) of _ [Occ=Dead] { False -> (wild1_a1Tj, wild_a1Tf); True -> wild_X8 } of r_s4e0 { (ipv_s4e1, ipv_s4e2) -> $wfoo_s4db (I# (-# ds_X1SR 1#)) (Just @ (Double, Double) r_s4e0) }}} Notice the case-of-case which doesn't expose the `Double` boxes of arguments to `$wfoo`. Why is that case-of-case still there? Because of `Note [Single- alternative cases]` in Simplify. Which is clearly a delicate spot so I don't want to meddle with it today. But it's intriguing. Maybe Sequent Core will do better. Note that late demand analysis also catches this case, yielding the (rather good) {{{ Rec { Main.$w$s$wfoo [InlPrag=[0], Occ=LoopBreaker] :: Int# -> Double# -> Double# -> Double# [GblId, Arity=3, Caf=NoCafRefs, Str=DmdType <S,1*U><L,U><L,U>] Main.$w$s$wfoo = \ (w_s4gW :: Int#) (ww_s4h1 :: Double#) (ww1_s4h5 :: Double#) -> case w_s4gW of ds_X1SW { __DEFAULT -> case tagToEnum# @ Bool (<=## ww_s4h1 ww1_s4h5) of _ [Occ=Dead] { False -> Main.$w$s$wfoo (-# ds_X1SW 1#) ww1_s4h5 ww_s4h1; True -> Main.$w$s$wfoo (-# ds_X1SW 1#) ww_s4h1 ww1_s4h5 }; 0# -> +## ww_s4h1 ww1_s4h5 } end Rec } }}} I'm pretty sure that late-demand-analysis should be on with `-O2` but someone should do a nofib run to check. -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/10626> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 10

[GHC] #10681: Teach GHC to interpret all hs files as two types of hs-boot files (abstract types only/full types + values)
by GHC 10 Feb '17

10 Feb '17

#10681: Teach GHC to interpret all hs files as two types of hs-boot files (abstract types only/full types + values) -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: ezyang | Owner: ezyang Type: feature | Status: new request | Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: Compiler | Version: 7.11 Keywords: | Operating System: Unknown/Multiple Architecture: | Type of failure: None/Unknown Unknown/Multiple | Test Case: | Blocked By: Blocking: | Related Tickets: Differential Revisions: | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- This is a new proposal for solving #1409. The big addition here is that we create **two** hs-boot files for each hs file: one that is a full hs-boot file to be imported by hs files to break loops, and a second which only includes abstract types for hs-boot files to import. C.f. #10679 **Discussion.** Here is a slightly goofy `hs-boot` file I've excerpted from GHC: {{{ module Packages where import {-# SOURCE #-} Module (PackageKey) import {-# SOURCE #-} DynFlags (DynFlags) packageKeyPackageIdString :: DynFlags -> PackageKey -> Maybe String }}} The `hs-boot` file must itself import `hs-boot` files, because this boot file is used by `Module` and `DynFlags`; without `{-# SOURCE #-}`, the boot file itself will participate in a cycle! But notice that there is something very interesting: a boot file is ONLY ever interested in importing other modules to get types. Never to import constructors or functions! We can use this observation to give us a mechanical transformation of an `hs` file to an `hs-boot` file, ASSUMING we can define a "second level" of `hs-boot` file to record our abstract types. **Example.** In this example, we have chosen to break the loop from `A`s import to `B`. {{{ module A where import {-# SOURCE #-} B data A = A B f :: A -> Bool f (A (B (A b))) = g b f _ = True module B where import A data B = B A g :: B -> Bool g (B (A (B b))) = f b g _ = False }}} The first-level `hs-boot`s are: {{{ module A where -- not actually used import {-# SOURCE 2 #-} B data A = A B f :: A -> Bool module B where import {-# SOURCE 2 #-} A data B = B A g :: B -> Bool }}} The second-level `hs-boot`s are: {{{ module A where data A module B where -- not actually used data B }}} **Commentary.** Here are some remarks: 1. Because we have to lift the transitive dependencies of anything we `{-# SOURCE #-}` import, it doesn't make sense to have a pragma which explicitly says what to put in the `hs-boot` file; instead, we just put in everything that we *can* handle in an `hs-boot` file (so exclude anything with missing type signatures, type families, etc.) Ideally, these automatic hs-boot files are generated lazily, but they should be reused as necessary. 2. This facility actually makes `{-# SOURCE #-}` a lot more attractive for increasing separate compilation: you can mark an import `{-# SOURCE #-}` to ensure that if its implementation changes, you don't have to recompile this module / you can build the module in parallel with that module. The downside is that when the imported file is modified, we have to regenerate the `hs-boot` stub before we conclude that the types have not changed (as opposed to with separate `hs-boot` files, where a modification to `hs` would not bump the timestamp on `hs-boot`. 3. This seems to definitely suggest that you should never need more than two levels of hs-boot nesting, or perhaps three with kinding. (But maybe someone has a fancy type system feature for which this is not true!) Maybe this applies to signature files too. 4. We can't force the first level of `hs-boot` files to be abstract types, for two reasons: (1) a source file importing the hs-boot file may really need the selector/constructor, and (2) the `hs-boot` files will reflect any cycles from the source files, that's no good! Rolling out to the second level breaks the cycle because abstract types never need any imports. -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/10681> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 9