November 2016 - ghc-tickets

[GHC] #12092: Wrong error message with TypeApplications
by GHC 31 Jan '19

31 Jan '19

#12092: Wrong error message with TypeApplications -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: kwf | Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: Compiler | Version: 8.0.1 (Type checker) | Keywords: | Operating System: Unknown/Multiple Architecture: | Type of failure: Incorrect Unknown/Multiple | warning at compile-time Test Case: | Blocked By: Blocking: | Related Tickets: Differential Rev(s): | Wiki Page: -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- When I write the following: {{{#!hs {-# language TypeApplications #-} module Bug where huh = spam @Int }}} I expect to get the error: {{{ • Variable not in scope: spam • Perhaps you meant ‘span’ (imported from Prelude) }}} But instead, I get the error: {{{ • Cannot apply expression of type ‘t0’ to a visible type argument ‘Int’ • In the expression: spam @Int In an equation for ‘huh’: huh = spam @Int }}} While it is //technically// true that I cannot apply an out-of-scope identifier to a visible type argument, this is probably the less useful error to receive. -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/12092> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 5

[GHC] #12758: Bring sanity to our performance testsuite
by GHC 28 Jan '19

28 Jan '19

#12758: Bring sanity to our performance testsuite -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: bgamari | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: 8.2.1 Component: Test Suite | Version: 8.0.1 Keywords: | Operating System: Unknown/Multiple Architecture: | Type of failure: None/Unknown Unknown/Multiple | Test Case: | Blocked By: Blocking: | Related Tickets: Differential Rev(s): | Wiki Page: -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- The GHC testsuite's performance tests tends to be a constant source of busy-work as it requires that contributors manually bump performance numbers and propagate these changes across platforms. Moreover, the testsuite is poor at noticing performance regressions due to false positive failures (due to spurious environmental differences) and false negatives (due to the rather generous acceptance windows that many tests have). Joachim and I briefly discussed this at Hac Phi and came up with the following proposal: * We rip expected performance numbers out of the `.T` files * -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/12758> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 20

[GHC] #9173: Better type error messages
by GHC 27 Jan '19

27 Jan '19

#9173: Better type error messages ------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: simonpj | Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: Compiler | Version: 7.8.2 Keywords: | Operating System: Unknown/Multiple Architecture: Unknown/Multiple | Type of failure: None/Unknown Difficulty: Unknown | Test Case: Blocked By: | Blocking: Related Tickets: | ------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Generating better type-error messages is a hoary chestnut, but Herbert brought my attention to [https://pay.reddit.com/r/haskell/comments/26tcrk/curious_with_a_bit_of_begi… this thread on reddit], which has the following idea. At the moment, from {{{ module Foo where addThree = \x -> x + 3 :: Int y = addThree $ Just 5 }}} we get this error: {{{ Foo.hs:2:20 Couldn't match expected type `Int' with actual type `Maybe a0' In the return type of a call of `Just' In the second argument of `($)', namely `Just 5' In the expression: addThree $ Just 5 }}} Maybe we could generate this instead {{{ Foo.hs:2:20 inferred: "Just 5" has type "Maybe a0" expected: second argument of "($)" must have type "Int" in the expression: addThree $ Just 5 }}} -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/9173> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 37

[GHC] #12364: Demand analysis for sum types
by GHC 25 Jan '19

25 Jan '19

#12364: Demand analysis for sum types -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: nomeata | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: Compiler | Version: 8.0.1 Keywords: | Operating System: Unknown/Multiple Architecture: | Type of failure: None/Unknown Unknown/Multiple | Test Case: | Blocked By: Blocking: | Related Tickets: Differential Rev(s): | Wiki Page: -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- While working on #10613 it crossed my mind that it might be worthwhile to expand the demand type also onto sum types. So instead of {{{ | UProd [ArgUse] -- Product }}} we would have {{{ | UData [[ArgUse]] -- Data type }}} and a function like {{{ fromMaybe :: a -> Maybe a -> b }}} would have a signature of {{{ <1*U><1*U(;1*U)> }}} which indicates that the second argument of `fromMaybe` is evaluated at most once; the first constructor of the result has no arguments, the second (separated by `;`) has one argument which is also used at most once. I could imagine that this gives a lot of useful information with parsers and other code that repeatedly retuns stuff wrapped in a `Maybe` or similar type. Now, sum types are often recursive (`[]`…), and we probably want to be smarter about recursion here. But note that this is not a new problem. If you write {{{ data Stream = Stream Int Stream Stream Stream foo (Stream 0 x y z) = 0 foo (Stream 1 x y z) = foo x foo (Stream 2 x y z) = foo y foo (Stream _ x y z) = foo z }}} you already get huge demand signatures. -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/12364> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 13

[GHC] #12599: Add Hadrian build artifacts to gitignore
by GHC 25 Jan '19

25 Jan '19

#12599: Add Hadrian build artifacts to gitignore -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: bgamari | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: Compiler | Version: 8.0.1 Keywords: | Operating System: Unknown/Multiple Architecture: | Type of failure: None/Unknown Unknown/Multiple | Test Case: | Blocked By: Blocking: | Related Tickets: Differential Rev(s): | Wiki Page: -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Andrey wrote requesting the following, > For top-level `.gitignore`: > {{{ > # ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > # Hadrian's stuff. Note, **/stageN/ folders will be relocated to _build/ after > # resolving https://github.com/snowleopard/hadrian/issues/113 > # ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > _build/ > hadrian/ > **/stage?/ > }}} > > For `.gitignore` in affected submodules (array, deepseq, directory, filepath, > hoopl, hpc, process, utils/hsc2hs): > > {{{ > # ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > # Hadrian's stuff. Note, stageN/ folders will be relocated to top-level _build/ > # after resolving https://github.com/snowleopard/hadrian/issues/113 > # ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > stage?/ > }}} -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/12599> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 9

[GHC] #9476: Implement late lambda-lifting
by GHC 25 Jan '19

25 Jan '19

#9476: Implement late lambda-lifting -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: simonpj | Owner: Type: feature request | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: Compiler | Version: 7.8.2 Keywords: | Operating System: Architecture: Unknown/Multiple | Unknown/Multiple Difficulty: Unknown | Type of failure: Blocked By: | None/Unknown Related Tickets: | Test Case: | Blocking: | Differential Revisions: -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- This ticket exists to coordinate work on Nick Frisby's '''late lambda- lifting''' optimisation. * Wiki page: [wiki:LateLamLift]. All the details are here. * Branch in GHC repo: `wip/llf` * Related tickets * #9279: local closure remains in final program * #9374: static argument transformation -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/9476> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 82

[GHC] #9251: ghc does not expose brancheless max/min operations as primops
by GHC 21 Jan '19

21 Jan '19

#9251: ghc does not expose brancheless max/min operations as primops ------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: carter | Owner: carter Type: task | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: 7.10.1 Component: Compiler | Version: 7.8.2 Keywords: | Operating System: Unknown/Multiple Architecture: Unknown/Multiple | Type of failure: None/Unknown Difficulty: Unknown | Test Case: Blocked By: | Blocking: Related Tickets: #9246 | ------------------------------------+------------------------------------- It was pointed out in #9246 that GHC currently does not expose primops for Max and Min on various unlifted types such as Float# and Double# and Int# and Word#, but that on most modern CPU architectures there is instruction level support for these operations. (Eg, Float# and #Double min and max can be provided on any 64bit x86 system pretty easily ) This ticket is to track doing that task. I'll probably do it one of the next two weekends to get back in the GHC hacking groove, or maybe this should be used as a "getting started" ticket for a new contributor? -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/9251> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 23

[GHC] #9279: Optimisation bug
by GHC 18 Jan '19

18 Jan '19

#9279: Optimisation bug ------------------------------+-------------------------------------------- Reporter: simonmar | Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: Compiler | Version: 7.8.2 Keywords: | Operating System: Unknown/Multiple Architecture: | Type of failure: Runtime performance bug Unknown/Multiple | Test Case: Difficulty: Unknown | Blocking: Blocked By: | Related Tickets: | ------------------------------+-------------------------------------------- I have a strange problem with a local function binding that is not being inlined. I've attached the repro code, build it like this: {{{ $ ghc -O2 Haxl/Core/Monad.hs }}} There are several modules, but the one with the problem is `Haxl/Core/Monad.hs`. In particular `Haxl.Core.Monad.$fApplicativeGenHaxl2`, which contains this fragment: {{{ let { $wa4_s6YQ $wa4_s6YQ = \ w_s6YF _ ww1_s6YM _ _ w1_s6YI -> case GHC.Prim.readMutVar# ipv7_X5Ne w1_s6YI of _ { (# ipv10_X5QO, ipv11_X5QQ #) -> case ipv11_X5QQ of _ { Haxl.Core.Monad.IVarFull a2_a3kK -> case lvl6_r7qi of wild3_00 { }; Haxl.Core.Monad.IVarEmpty dt2_d4Vs -> case GHC.Prim.writeMutVar# ipv7_X5Ne (Haxl.Core.Monad.IVarFull w_s6YF) ipv10_X5QO of s2#_a5OR { __DEFAULT -> case GHC.Prim.readMutVar# dt2_d4Vs s2#_a5OR of _ { (# ipv12_X5R0, ipv13_X5R2 #) -> case GHC.Prim.readMutVar# ww1_s6YM ipv12_X5R0 of _ { (# ipv14_X5SS, ipv15_X5SU #) -> letrec { go_a5ti go_a5ti = \ ds10_a5tj -> case ds10_a5tj of _ { [] -> ipv15_X5SU; : y_a5to ys_a5tp -> GHC.Types.: (y_a5to w_s6YF) (go_a5ti ys_a5tp) }; } in case go_a5ti ipv13_X5R2 of x'_a5P6 { __DEFAULT -> case GHC.Prim.writeMutVar# ww1_s6YM x'_a5P6 ipv14_X5SS of s2#1_a5P7 { __DEFAULT -> (# s2#1_a5P7, Haxl.Core.Monad.cacheRequest6 #) } } } } } } } } in let { a2_s6lH a2_s6lH = \ w_s6YF _ w2_s6YH w3_s6YI -> case w2_s6YH of _ { Haxl.Core.Monad.SchedState ww1_s6YL ww2_s6YM ww3_s6YN ww4_s6YO -> $wa4_s6YQ w_s6YF ww1_s6YL ww2_s6YM ww3_s6YN ww4_s6YO w3_s6YI } } in }}} I want `$wa4` to be inlined at its single occurrence in `a2`. I believe the reason it is not being inlined is that `a2` is a wrapper, but the situation seems silly because the wrapper isn't going away either, so we have a redundant closure being built (this is in my inner loop). -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/9279> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 26

[GHC] #11126: Entered absent arg in a Repa program
by GHC 18 Jan '19

18 Jan '19

#11126: Entered absent arg in a Repa program -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: tuplanolla | Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: Compiler | Version: 7.10.2 Keywords: | Operating System: Unknown/Multiple Architecture: | Type of failure: Incorrect result Unknown/Multiple | at runtime Test Case: | Blocked By: Blocking: | Related Tickets: Differential Rev(s): | Wiki Page: -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Consider the following program. {{{#!hs module Main where import Data.Array.Repa data Stuff = !(Array U DIM1 Double) `With` !Double deriving Show through :: Maybe Double -> Stuff -> Stuff m `through` (a `With` _) = let b = a +^ (negate `smap` sumS (extend (Z :. All :. (1 :: Int)) a)) c = maybe b (const (negate `smap` a)) m in computeUnboxedS c `With` sumAllS b main :: IO () main = print $ Just 1 `through` (fromListUnboxed (Z :. 1) [1] `With` 1) }}} It should produce the following result once run. {{{#!hs AUnboxed (Z :. 1) (fromList [-1.0]) `With` 0.0 }}} However, when built using `repa-3.4.0.1` and compiled with the options `-O3 -Wall -funfolding-keeness-factor1000 -funfolding-use-threshold1000`, it crashes as follows. {{{#!hs Main: Oops! Entered absent arg arr2 Array D DIM1 Double }}} Adding `-fno-strictness` to the compiler options or removing strictness annotations from the code makes the problem disappear, so this looks like a strictness analyzer problem. The libraries used were * `QuickCheck-2.8.1`, * `array-0.5.1.0`, * `base-4.8.1.0`, * `bytestring-0.10.6.0`, * `containers-0.5.6.2`, * `deepseq-1.4.1.1`, * `ghc-prim-0.4.0.0`, * `integer-gmp-1.0.0.0`, * `pretty-1.1.2.0`, * `primitive-0.6`, * `random-1.1`, * `repa-3.4.0.1`, * `template-haskell-2.10.0.0`, * `tf-random-0.5`, * `time-1.5.0.1`, * `transformers-0.4.2.0` and * `vector-0.10.12.3`. -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/11126> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 23

[GHC] #10918: Float once-used let binding into a recursive function
by GHC 18 Jan '19

18 Jan '19

#10918: Float once-used let binding into a recursive function -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: nomeata | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: Compiler | Version: 7.10.2 Keywords: | Operating System: Unknown/Multiple Architecture: | Type of failure: None/Unknown Unknown/Multiple | Test Case: | Blocked By: Blocking: | Related Tickets: Differential Rev(s): | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Consider this code {{{#!hs let x = f x0 in let go 10 = x go i = go (i+1) in go (0::Int) }}} Currently, this is pretty much the core that comes out at the end. But what we want to see instead is {{{#!hs let go 10 = let x = f x 0 in x go i = go (i+1) in go (0::Int) }}} In general, we do not want to float a binding into a recursive function, because we would risk doing the allocation and/or evaluation of it multiple times. But in this case, we can see that it is going to be used at most once, so it is safe to do so. Even more: In the slightly less contrived examples that I was looking at, the call to `x` was happening in the a less likely code path, so this way we’d avoid doing the allocation in most cases, a clear win. It might be enough to simply make `CallArity` (or rather the cardinality analysis done by call arity) tell the rest of the compiler that it found that `x` is called at most once, and hopefully the simplifier knows what to make of that information. -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/10918> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 14