April 2016 - ghc-tickets

[GHC] #8708: Kind annotation in tuple not parsed
by GHC 05 Oct '18

05 Oct '18

#8708: Kind annotation in tuple not parsed -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: goldfire | Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: Compiler (Parser) | Version: 7.7 Keywords: | Operating System: Unknown/Multiple Architecture: Unknown/Multiple | Type of failure: None/Unknown Difficulty: Unknown | Test Case: Blocked By: | Blocking: Related Tickets: | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Consider this: {{{ {-# LANGUAGE KindSignatures #-} foo :: (Int, Int :: *) foo = undefined }}} HEAD reports {{{ /Users/rae/temp/Bug.hs:5:18: parse error on input ‛::’ }}} Changing the line to {{{ foo :: (Int, (Int :: *)) }}} fixes the problem. Note the extra parentheses. -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/8708> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 5

[GHC] #11622: Annotating types in type familiy equations without parentheses
by GHC 05 Oct '18

05 Oct '18

#11622: Annotating types in type familiy equations without parentheses -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: Iceland_jack | Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: Compiler | Version: 8.1 Keywords: | Operating System: Unknown/Multiple Architecture: | Type of failure: None/Unknown Unknown/Multiple | Test Case: | Blocked By: Blocking: | Related Tickets: Differential Rev(s): | Wiki Page: -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- When annotating types in right-hand side of type family equations parentheses are required: {{{#!hs type family F a where F _ = (Int :: Type) }}} instead of {{{#!hs type family F a where F _ = Int :: Type }}} -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/11622> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 6

[GHC] #11251: isInstance does not work on Typeable with base-4.8 anymore
by GHC 04 Oct '18

04 Oct '18

#11251: isInstance does not work on Typeable with base-4.8 anymore -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: songzh | Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: | Version: 7.10.1 libraries/base | Keywords: Typeable, | Operating System: Unknown/Multiple isInstance | Architecture: | Type of failure: None/Unknown Unknown/Multiple | Test Case: | Blocked By: Blocking: | Related Tickets: Differential Rev(s): | Wiki Page: -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- {{{#!hs > :set -XTemplateHaskell > :m +Data.Tyepable > :m +Language.Haskell.TH --- With GHC 7.8 or earlier versions of GHC (I only tried with GHC 7.6, but my friends tried on 7.8 and earlier versoin) > $(isInstance ''Typeable [ConT ''Char] >>= stringE.show) "True" --- With GHC 7.10.1 > $(isInstance ''Typeable [ConT ''Char] >>= stringE.show) "False" }}} I have noticed that standalone derivings of Typeable instances in Data.Typeable are disappared magically in base-4.8 of GHC 7.10,also one cannot query the instances of it by using `:i Typeable` in GHCi, however, obviously, I can use `typeOf` function in base-4.8 to get the TypeRep of Char. The problem is that `isInstance` in template-haskell library doesn't know Char and many other types are instances of Typeable anymore. -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/11251> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 8

[GHC] #9136: Constant folding in Core could be better
by GHC 03 Oct '18

03 Oct '18

#9136: Constant folding in Core could be better ------------------------------+-------------------------------------------- Reporter: simonpj | Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: Compiler | Version: 7.8.2 Keywords: | Operating System: Unknown/Multiple Architecture: | Type of failure: Runtime performance bug Unknown/Multiple | Test Case: Difficulty: Unknown | Blocking: Blocked By: | Related Tickets: | ------------------------------+-------------------------------------------- Constant folding in Core is still a bit feeble. For example, when staring at the code for `nofib/shootout/k-nucleotide` I saw this expression: {{{ (x +# 8) -# 1 }}} which would be relatively easy to optimise. The difficulty is knowing where to stop. What about `(8 +# x) -# 1`? Anyway, this ticket is to record the issue. Currently constant folding is done by the built-in RULES in `compiler/prelude/PrelRules`. -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/9136> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 31

[GHC] #10791: Add a --disable-large-memory-space configure option
by GHC 03 Oct '18

03 Oct '18

#10791: Add a --disable-large-memory-space configure option -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: erikd | Owner: erikd Type: feature | Status: new request | Priority: normal | Milestone: 7.12.1 Component: Build | Version: 7.11 System | Keywords: | Operating System: Unknown/Multiple Architecture: | Type of failure: None/Unknown Unknown/Multiple | Test Case: | Blocked By: Blocking: | Related Tickets: Differential Revisions: | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- GHC recently started using large (1TB) address space on 64 bit systems. This feature is enabled by default but does not work on arm64-linux or amd64-solaris. Even just for testing, it would be nice to be able to disable this. -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/10791> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 6

[GHC] #10793: Incorrect blocked on MVar detection
by GHC 02 Oct '18

02 Oct '18

#10793: Incorrect blocked on MVar detection -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: | Owner: simonmar NeilMitchell | Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: Runtime | Version: 7.10.1 System | Keywords: | Operating System: Windows Architecture: | Type of failure: None/Unknown Unknown/Multiple | Test Case: | Blocked By: Blocking: | Related Tickets: Differential Revisions: | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Given the code: {{{#!hs import Control.Concurrent main = do v <- newEmptyMVar forkFinally (putStrLn $ let x = x in x) (putMVar v) print =<< takeMVar v }}} The spawned thread should raise a {{{NonTermination}}} exception (assuming idle GC), then put it in the MVar {{{v}}}, which should cause the main thread to abort printing {{{Left <<loop>>}}}. However, in reality, the main thread aborts with {{{Exception: thread blocked indefinitely in an MVar operation}}}. My debugging shows that the spawned thread raises {{{NonTermination}}} and at the same time the main thread raises {{{BlockedIndefinitelyOnMVar}}}. Of course, the main thread is not really blocked on the exception, and after the finally bit runs, the MVar is filled. Adding tracing shows that the {{{putMVar}}} is called. Hypothesis is that the GC notices it can raise the non-termination exception, and then opportunistically excludes that thread from further GC scanning, and detects the MVar is unreferenced, raising the subsequent exception. Of course, given you can catch the exception, that isn't safe. Roman Leshchinskiy worries that in the wrong circumstances the MVar might really be being GC'd and thus could corrupt memory. This issue was detected while debugging an error in the Shake build system for GHC itself. -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/10793> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 7

[GHC] #8226: Remove the old style -- # Haddock comments.
by GHC 01 Oct '18

01 Oct '18

#8226: Remove the old style -- # Haddock comments. ------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: Fuuzetsu | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: 7.8.1 Component: Compiler | Version: 7.7 Keywords: | Operating System: Unknown/Multiple Architecture: Unknown/Multiple | Type of failure: None/Unknown Difficulty: Unknown | Test Case: Blocked By: | Blocking: Related Tickets: | ------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Haddock 0.x supported -- # style comments for Haddock pragma and while this seems to have been long forgotten and not documented, it's still kicking in the lexer. I think this is a good time to get rid of these all together. Relevant Haddock ticket http://trac.haskell.org/haddock/ticket/171 I'll hopefully send in patches removing these from the lexer/parser tomorrow, if all goes well (unless anyone feels eager to do it, then please, you're most welcome to do so!). -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/8226> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 11

[GHC] #11498: GHC requires kind-polymorphic signatures on class head
by GHC 01 Oct '18

01 Oct '18

#11498: GHC requires kind-polymorphic signatures on class head -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: crockeea | Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: Compiler | Version: 7.10.2-rc2 Keywords: | Operating System: Unknown/Multiple Architecture: | Type of failure: GHC rejects Unknown/Multiple | valid program Test Case: | Blocked By: Blocking: | Related Tickets: Differential Rev(s): | Wiki Page: -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- I have the following compiling example: {{{ {-# LANGUAGE DataKinds, FlexibleContexts, FlexibleInstances, KindSignatures, MultiParamTypeClasses, PolyKinds, RankNTypes, ScopedTypeVariables, TypeFamilies, TypeOperators #-} import Data.Proxy import GHC.Prim type family CtxOf d (args :: k) :: Constraint class Run ctx (params :: [k]) where runAll :: Proxy params -> Proxy ctx -> (forall (args :: k) . (CtxOf ctx args) => Proxy args -> Bool) -> [Bool] data BasicCtxD type instance CtxOf BasicCtxD '(a,b) = (a ~ b) instance (Run BasicCtxD params, a ~ b) => Run BasicCtxD ( '(a,b) ': params) where runAll _ pctx f = (f (Proxy::Proxy '(a,b))) : (runAll (Proxy::Proxy params) pctx f) }}} But if I move the kind signature of `params` to its occurrence in the signature of `runAll`: {{{ class Run ctx params where runAll :: Proxy (params :: [k]) -> Proxy ctx -> (forall (args :: k) . (CtxOf ctx args) => Proxy args -> Bool) -> [Bool] }}} I get a couple of nasty (and confusing) compile errors. {{{ Main.hs:20:25: Couldn't match kind ‘k1’ with ‘(,) k k’ ‘k1’ is a rigid type variable bound by the type signature for runAll :: Proxy ('(a, b) : params) -> Proxy BasicCtxD -> (forall (args :: k1). CtxOf BasicCtxD args => Proxy args -> Bool) -> [Bool] at Main.hs:20:3 Expected type: Proxy args0 Actual type: Proxy '(a, b) Relevant bindings include f :: forall (args :: k1). CtxOf BasicCtxD args => Proxy args -> Bool (bound at Main.hs:20:17) runAll :: Proxy ('(a, b) : params) -> Proxy BasicCtxD -> (forall (args :: k1). CtxOf BasicCtxD args => Proxy args -> Bool) -> [Bool] (bound at Main.hs:20:3) In the first argument of ‘f’, namely ‘(Proxy :: Proxy '(a, b))’ In the first argument of ‘(:)’, namely ‘(f (Proxy :: Proxy '(a, b)))’ In the expression: (f (Proxy :: Proxy '(a, b))) : (runAll (Proxy :: Proxy params) pctx f) Main.hs:21:42: Could not deduce (k1 ~ (,) k k) from the context (CtxOf BasicCtxD args) bound by a type expected by the context: CtxOf BasicCtxD args => Proxy args -> Bool at Main.hs:21:8-42 ‘k1’ is a rigid type variable bound by the type signature for runAll :: Proxy ('(a, b) : params) -> Proxy BasicCtxD -> (forall (args :: k1). CtxOf BasicCtxD args => Proxy args -> Bool) -> [Bool] at Main.hs:20:3 Expected type: Proxy args -> Bool Actual type: Proxy args1 -> Bool Relevant bindings include f :: forall (args :: k1). CtxOf BasicCtxD args => Proxy args -> Bool (bound at Main.hs:20:17) runAll :: Proxy ('(a, b) : params) -> Proxy BasicCtxD -> (forall (args :: k1). CtxOf BasicCtxD args => Proxy args -> Bool) -> [Bool] (bound at Main.hs:20:3) In the third argument of ‘runAll’, namely ‘f’ In the second argument of ‘(:)’, namely ‘(runAll (Proxy :: Proxy params) pctx f)’ }}} It seems to me that the two definitions of the class are equivalent, so it would be nice if they both compiled. It wasn't obvious to me that the kind signature had to go on the class parameter rather than somewhere else. -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/11498> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 6

[GHC] #10986: GHC should delete all temporary files it creates in /tmp
by GHC 30 Sep '18

30 Sep '18

#10986: GHC should delete all temporary files it creates in /tmp -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: erikd | Owner: Type: feature | Status: new request | Priority: normal | Milestone: 8.0.1 Component: Compiler | Version: 7.11 Keywords: | Operating System: Unknown/Multiple Architecture: | Type of failure: None/Unknown Unknown/Multiple | Test Case: | Blocked By: Blocking: | Related Tickets: Differential Rev(s): | Wiki Page: -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- GHC creates large numbers of temporary files in /tmp. These would normally get cleaned up when the machine is rebooted, but for things like Jenkins build machines that don't get rebooted often they buld up pretty quickly. The /tmp on my Jenkins build machine currently has over 200k files and directories, but only about 40 of them are non-GHC related files. Under normal operation, GHC should delete all temporary files it creates. -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/10986> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 26

[GHC] #11955: Haddock documentation for pattern synonyms printed with explicit forall quantifiers
by GHC 29 Sep '18

29 Sep '18

#11955: Haddock documentation for pattern synonyms printed with explicit forall quantifiers -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: darchon | Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: 8.0.1 Component: Compiler | Version: 8.0.1-rc3 Keywords: | Operating System: Unknown/Multiple Architecture: | Type of failure: None/Unknown Unknown/Multiple | Test Case: | Blocked By: Blocking: | Related Tickets: Differential Rev(s): | Wiki Page: -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Running haddock on: {{{#!hs {-# LANGUAGE PatternSynonyms #-} module Foo ( A(..), pattern P ) where data A a = A a pattern P :: a -> A a pattern P a <- A a }}} in GHC 7.10.3 gives haddock documentation for P in the form of: {{{ pattern P :: a -> A a }}} while the haddock in GHC 8.0.1-rc3 gives haddock documentation for P in the form of: {{{ pattern P :: forall a. a -> A a }}} I think GHC/Haddock should not be adding the forall quantifier, and hence think the behaviour in GHC 8.0.1-rc3 is wrong, and the behaviour of GHC 7.10.3 is preferred. -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/11955> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 7