January 2017 - ghc-tickets

[GHC] #10827: GHCi should support interpeting multiple packages/units with separate DynFlags
by GHC 07 Sep '18

07 Sep '18

#10827: GHCi should support interpeting multiple packages/units with separate DynFlags -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: ezyang | Owner: Type: feature | Status: new request | Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: GHC API | Version: 7.11 Keywords: backpack | Operating System: Unknown/Multiple Architecture: | Type of failure: None/Unknown Unknown/Multiple | Test Case: | Blocked By: Blocking: | Related Tickets: Differential Revisions: | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Stack and other tools are attempting to make the user-experience of developing multiple packages simultaneously better. Thus, if you have source packages p, q and r (which all depend on them), `stack build` builds all of them. They are quite interested in support `stack ghci` but there are problems: https://github.com/commercialhaskell/stack/issues/665 The essence of the problem is twofold: 1. If you ask GHCi to interpret modules from multiple packages (e.g. by having multiple source directories), GHCi currently only knows how to put all of them into the same home package. This will fail if two packages have a module with the same name; also, modules in the other packages will always see modules (even if they're supposed to be hidden). 2. A GHCi session only has one global set of dynamic flags, but each package may be compiled with its own set of DynFlags (e.g. package global LANGUAGE pragmas). This means the "default DynFlags" needs to be varied between packages. It's not too obvious to me how to fix (1) (at least, you'd have to make the HPT support sets of HomeModInfos from multiple packages), but (2) seems tractable: since we already track DynFlags on a per-module basis, we just have to arrange for a "package" level DynFlag to be applied to the correct ModSummarys. Similar functionality would be useful for Backpack. -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/10827> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 5

[GHC] #12356: StaticPointers support in GHCi
by GHC 07 Sep '18

07 Sep '18

#12356: StaticPointers support in GHCi -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: bgamari | Owner: Type: feature | Status: new request | Priority: normal | Milestone: 8.2.1 Component: Compiler | Version: 8.0.1 Keywords: | Operating System: Unknown/Multiple Architecture: | Type of failure: None/Unknown Unknown/Multiple | Test Case: | Blocked By: Blocking: | Related Tickets: #12000 Differential Rev(s): | Wiki Page: -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Currently GHCi does not support `-XStaticPointers`, which is quite annoying for those of us who actually use `-XStaticPointers` in day-to-day development. It would be great if GHCi could grow support for this extension. -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/12356> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 19

[GHC] #9622: GHCi command to solve a constraint
by GHC 07 Sep '18

07 Sep '18

#9622: GHCi command to solve a constraint -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: monoidal | Owner: Type: feature request | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: Compiler (Type | Version: 7.8.3 checker) | Operating System: Keywords: | Unknown/Multiple Architecture: Unknown/Multiple | Type of failure: Difficulty: Unknown | None/Unknown Blocked By: | Test Case: Related Tickets: | Blocking: | Differential Revisions: -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- It would be nice to have a `:solve` command for ghci that took a class constraint and returned either its derivation or an error message. A possible interface could look like so: {{{ ghci> :solve Eq (Maybe Type1, Bool) 1) instance Eq Type1 -- Defined in ‘MyModule’ 2) instance Eq a => Eq (Maybe a) -- Defined in ‘GHC.Classes’ 3) instance Eq (Maybe Type1) -- Put a ~ Int in 2) and use 1) 4) instance Eq Bool -- Defined in ‘GHC.Classes’ 5) instance (Eq a, Eq b) => Eq (a,b) -- Defined in ‘GHC.Classes’ 6) instance Eq (Maybe Type1, Bool) -- Put a ~ Maybe Type1, b ~ Bool in 5) and use 3), 4) ghci> :solve Eq (Int -> Int) No instance for Eq (Int -> Int) }}} -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/9622> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 2

[GHC] #10249: Suboptimal error message with deferred type errors
by GHC 05 Sep '18

05 Sep '18

#10249: Suboptimal error message with deferred type errors -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: | Owner: Iceland_jack | Status: new Type: feature | Milestone: request | Version: 7.10.1 Priority: normal | Operating System: Unknown/Multiple Component: GHCi | Type of failure: None/Unknown Keywords: | Blocked By: Architecture: | Related Tickets: Unknown/Multiple | Test Case: | Blocking: | Differential Revisions: | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- {{{#!hs $ ghci -fdefer-type-errors -ignore-dot-ghci GHCi, version 7.10.0.20150316: http://www.haskell.org/ghc/ :? for help Prelude> _ <interactive>:2:1: Warning: Found hole ‘_’ with type: IO t0 Where: ‘t0’ is an ambiguous type variable In the first argument of ‘GHC.GHCi.ghciStepIO :: IO a_aly -> IO a_aly’, namely ‘_’ In a stmt of an interactive GHCi command: it <- GHC.GHCi.ghciStepIO :: IO a_aly -> IO a_aly _ *** Exception: <interactive>:2:1: Found hole ‘_’ with type: IO t0 Where: ‘t0’ is an ambiguous type variable In the first argument of ‘GHC.GHCi.ghciStepIO :: IO a_aly -> IO a_aly’, namely ‘_’ In a stmt of an interactive GHCi command: it <- GHC.GHCi.ghciStepIO :: IO a_aly -> IO a_aly _ (deferred type error) Prelude> }}} It should ideally not expose `ghciStepIO` to the user. -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/10249> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 11

[GHC] #10756: Allow users to indicate inaccessible patterns
by GHC 04 Sep '18

04 Sep '18

#10756: Allow users to indicate inaccessible patterns -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: edsko | Owner: Type: feature | Status: new request | Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: Compiler | Version: 7.10.2 Keywords: | Operating System: Unknown/Multiple Architecture: | Type of failure: None/Unknown Unknown/Multiple | Test Case: | Blocked By: Blocking: | Related Tickets: Differential Revisions: | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Consider {{{#!hs {-# LANGUAGE KindSignatures #-} {-# LANGUAGE GADTs #-} data Elem :: * -> * -> * where EZ :: Elem (f , fs) f ES :: Elem fs f -> Elem (f', fs) f elemAbsurd :: Elem () f -> a elemAbsurd _ = error "inaccessible" }}} This catch-all in `elemAbsurd` is very unfortunate, because if I change my datatype and not all cases are inaccessible anymore the type checker will not be warning me. Although of course there is recent work by SPJ et al on inferring more inaccessible cases, I think it would be tremendously useful for users to be able to indicate that patterns are in fact inaccesible. I'd be very happy if I could write {{{#!hs elemAbsurd :: Elem () f -> a elemAbsurd EZ = inaccessible elemAbsurd (ES _) = inaccessible }}} Note that ghc ''can already detect that these patterns are in fact inaccessible'': it won't let me write the above: {{{ T.hs:12:12: Couldn't match type ‘()’ with ‘(f, fs)’ Inaccessible code in a pattern with constructor EZ :: forall f fs. Elem (f, fs) f, in an equation for ‘elemAbsurd’ }}} So I think it should be very very simple to change the type checker to allow to write cases like this if and only if the RHS is a specially designated symbol "inaccessible", which could be defined simply as {{{#!hs inaccessible :: a inaccessible = error "inaccessible" }}} in `GHC.Prim` or something. This would seem like very little work, and a correspondingly tiny patch, but with quite a large payoff. Future work in automatically detecting inaccessible cases would not make existing code using this style wrong, it just means that we have to write fewer inaccessible cases by hand; but even with more sophisticated inference algorithms for inaccessible cases there will still be inaccessible cases remaining. -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/10756> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 15

[GHC] #8414: ghc-pkg prevents dynamic library only packages
by GHC 04 Sep '18

04 Sep '18

#8414: ghc-pkg prevents dynamic library only packages ------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: AndreasVoellmy | Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: ghc-pkg | Version: Keywords: | Operating System: Unknown/Multiple Architecture: Unknown/Multiple | Type of failure: Other Difficulty: Unknown | Test Case: Blocked By: | Blocking: Related Tickets: | ------------------------------------+------------------------------------- GHC supports compiling Haskell libraries as dynamic libraries and building executables against dynamic libraries. GHCi seems to support loading modules from dynamic libraries, too. So it would seem that it should be possible to have packages that only include dynamic libraries, omitting the .a and .o files typically generated. cabal-install allows building dynamic libraries only, for example with the command "cabal install --disable-library-vanilla --enable-shared --disable-library-profiling". However, ghc-pkg register refuses to install the package without the .a files present. This seems to be a bug with ghc-pkg. -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/8414> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 6

[GHC] #10374: Can't build GHC with a dynamic only GHC installation
by GHC 04 Sep '18

04 Sep '18

#10374: Can't build GHC with a dynamic only GHC installation -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: jessicah | Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: Build | Version: 7.10.1 System | Operating System: Unknown/Multiple Keywords: | Type of failure: Building GHC Architecture: | failed Unknown/Multiple | Blocked By: Test Case: | Related Tickets: Blocking: | Differential Revisions: | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- When an installation of GHC doesn't include the vanilla "way", GHC cannot be built from this existing installation of GHC. E.g. using the following mk/build.mk: {{{ V = 0 GhcLibWays = dyn SRC_HC_OPTS = -O -H64m GhcStage1HcOpts = -O -fasm GhcStage2HcOpts = -O2 -fasm GhcHcOpts = -Rghc-timing GhcLibHcOpts = -O2 DYNAMIC_BY_DEFAULT = YES NoFibWays = STRIP_CMD = : }}} Steps to reproduce: 1. build & install GHC using above configuration 2. rebuild GHC using above configuration, --with-ghc pointing to the installation created in step 1 -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/10374> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 5

[GHC] #8441: Allow family instances in an hs-boot file
by GHC 03 Sep '18

03 Sep '18

#8441: Allow family instances in an hs-boot file ------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: goldfire | Owner: Type: feature request | Status: new Priority: low | Milestone: Component: Compiler | Version: 7.7 Keywords: | Operating System: Unknown/Multiple Architecture: Unknown/Multiple | Type of failure: None/Unknown Difficulty: Unknown | Test Case: Blocked By: | Blocking: Related Tickets: | ------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Compiling an .hs-boot file with a data instance leads to this error: {{{ Illegal family instance in hs-boot file }}} Yet, data instances make good sense in an hs-boot file, in case another module wants to access a constructor declared in the instance. Furthermore, it may sometimes be desirable to allow type family instances in a hs-boot file, as well, in case some including modules need the instance for type simplification. -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/8441> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 10

[GHC] #8279: bad alignment in code gen yields substantial perf issue
by GHC 29 Aug '18

29 Aug '18

#8279: bad alignment in code gen yields substantial perf issue ------------------------------+-------------------------------------------- Reporter: carter | Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: highest | Milestone: Component: Compiler | Version: 7.7 Keywords: | Operating System: Unknown/Multiple Architecture: | Type of failure: Runtime performance bug Unknown/Multiple | Test Case: Difficulty: Unknown | Blocking: Blocked By: | Related Tickets: | ------------------------------+-------------------------------------------- independently, a number of folks have noticed that in various ways, GHC currently has quite a few different memory alignment related performance problems that can have >= 10% perf impact! Nicolas Frisby notes {{{ On my laptop, a program showed a consistent slowdown with -fdicts-strict I didn't find any obvious causes in the Core differences, so I turned to Intel's Performance Counter Monitor for measurements. After trying a few counters, I eventuall saw that there are about an order of magnitude more misaligned memory loads with -fdicts-strict than without, so I think that may be a significant part of the slowdown. I'm not sure if these are code or data reads. Can anyone suggest how to validate this hypothesis about misaligned reads? A subsequent commit has changed the behavior I was seeing, so I'm not interested in alternatives means to determine if -fdicts-strict is somehow at fault — I'm just asking specifically about data/code memory alignment in GHC and how to diagnose/experiment with it. }}} Reid Barton has independently noted {{{ so I did a nofib run with llvm libraries, ghc quickbuild so there's this really simple benchmark tak, https://github.com/ghc/nofib/blob/master/imaginary/tak/Main.hs it doesn't use any libraries at all in the main loop because the Ints all get unboxed but it's still 8% slower with quick-llvm (vs -fasm) weird right? [14:36:30] <carter> could you post the asm it generates for that function? [14:36:49] <rwbarton> well it's identical between the two versions <rwbarton> but they get linked at different offsets because some llvm sections are different sizes <rwbarton> if I add a 128-byte symbol to the .text section to move it to the same address... then the llvm libs version is just as fast <rwbarton> well, apparently 404000 is good and 403f70 is bad <rwbarton> I guess I can test other alignments easily enough <rwbarton> I imagine it wants to start on a cache line <rwbarton> but I don't know if it's just a coincidence that it worked with the ncg libraries <rwbarton> that it got a good location <rwbarton> for this program every 32-byte aligned address is 10+% faster than any merely 16-byte aligned address <rwbarton> and by alignment I mean alignment of the start of the Haskell code section <carter> haswell, sandybridge, ivy bridge, other? <rwbarton> dunno <rwbarton> I have similar results on Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T7300 @ 2.00GHz <rwbarton> and on Quad-Core AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 2374 HE <carter> ok <rwbarton> trying a patch now that aligns all *_entry symbols to 32 bytes }}} the key point in there is that on the tak benchmark, better alignment for the code made a 10% perf differnce on TAk on Core2 and opteron cpus! benjamin scarlet and Luite are speculating that this may be further induced by Tables next to code (TNC) accidentally creating bad alignment so theres cache line pollution / conflicts between the L1 Instruction- cache and data-caches. So one experiment would be to have the TNC transform pad after the table so the function entry point starts on the next cacheline? -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/8279> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 26

[GHC] #11350: Allow visible type application in patterns
by GHC 28 Aug '18

28 Aug '18

#11350: Allow visible type application in patterns -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: Iceland_jack | Owner: Type: feature | Status: new request | Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: Compiler | Version: 8.1 Keywords: | Operating System: Unknown/Multiple TypeApplications PatternSynonyms | Architecture: | Type of failure: None/Unknown Unknown/Multiple | Test Case: | Blocked By: Blocking: | Related Tickets: Differential Rev(s): | Wiki Page: -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Constructors (and pattern synonyms) when treated as expressions may be applied to types: {{{#!hs {-# LANGUAGE TypeApplications #-} Nothing :: Maybe a Nothing @() :: Maybe () pattern Pair :: a -> a -> (a, a) pattern Pair x y = (x, y) Pair :: a -> a -> (a, a) Pair @Int :: Int -> Int -> (Int, Int) }}} But using them in patterns won't parse: {{{#!hs -- parse error in pattern: @Int maybeToList :: Maybe Int -> [Int] maybeToList (Nothing @Int) = [] maybeToList (Just @Int x) = [x] -- parse error in pattern: @Int add :: (Int, Int) -> Int add (Pair @Int x y) = x + y }}} -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/11350> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 23