April 2018 - ghc-tickets

[GHC] #10346: Cross-module SpecConstr
by GHC 24 Aug '18

24 Aug '18

#10346: Cross-module SpecConstr -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: simonpj | Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: Compiler | Version: 7.10.1 Keywords: | Operating System: Unknown/Multiple Architecture: | Type of failure: None/Unknown Unknown/Multiple | Blocked By: Test Case: | Related Tickets: Blocking: | Differential Revisions: | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Type-class specialisation now happens flawlessly across modules. That is, if I define {{{ module DefineF where f :: Num a => a -> a {-# INLINEABLE f #-} f x = ...f x'.... }}} then modules that import `DefineF` and call `f` at some particular type (say `Int`) will generate a specialised copy of `f`'s code. But this does not happen for `SpecConstr`; we only specialise a function for calls made in the same module. All the infrastructure is in place to allow cross-module `SpecConstr`; it just hasn't been done yet. This ticket is to record the idea. -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/10346> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 19

[GHC] #12695: Build failure due to MAP_NORESERVE being removed in FreeBSD 11.x and later
by GHC 23 Aug '18

23 Aug '18

#12695: Build failure due to MAP_NORESERVE being removed in FreeBSD 11.x and later -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: abbe | Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: Compiler | Version: 8.0.1 Keywords: | Operating System: FreeBSD Architecture: | Type of failure: Building GHC Unknown/Multiple | failed Test Case: | Blocked By: Blocking: | Related Tickets: Differential Rev(s): | Wiki Page: -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- While trying to build GHC 8.0.1 on FreeBSD 11.x, I come across following compiler error: {{{ /usr/local/bin/clang-cpp38 -DPROFILING -DTHREADED_RTS -DDEBUG -fno- stack-protector -O2 -pipe -Qunused-arguments -I/usr/local/include -fstack-protector -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -Wall -Wextra -Wstrict- prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -Winline -Waggregate-return -Wpointer-arith -Wmissing-noreturn -Wnested-externs -Wredundant-decls -Iincludes -Iincludes/dist -Iincludes/dist- derivedconstants/header -Iincludes/dist-ghcconstants/header -Irts -Irts/dist/build -DCOMPILING_RTS -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -Irts/dist/build/autogen -Wno-unknown-pragmas -O2 -fomit-frame- pointer -g -DRtsWay=\"rts_v\" -MM -x c rts/posix/OSMem.c -MF rts/dist/build/.depend-v-p-dyn-l-debug-thr-thr_debug-thr_l-thr_p- debug_dyn-thr_dyn-thr_debug_dyn-l_dyn-thr_l_dyn.c_asm.bit rts/posix/OSMem.c:158:5: error: USE_LARGE_ADDRESS_SPACE needs MAP_NORESERVE # error USE_LARGE_ADDRESS_SPACE needs MAP_NORESERVE ^ 1 error generated. }}} From some [https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/sys/sys/mman.h?r1=273249&r2=273250& investigation], it turns out when it was there, it was not even implemented. The value of `__FreeBSD_version` (in case you plan to add conditional based on it), where it is [https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/sys/sys/param.h?r1=273250&r2=273249&pa… changed] is `1100039`. Let me know if you need more information. Thanks for looking -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/12695> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 6

[GHC] #11474: incorrect redundant-constraints warning
by GHC 23 Aug '18

23 Aug '18

#11474: incorrect redundant-constraints warning -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: hvr | Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: highest | Milestone: 8.0.1 Component: Compiler | Version: 8.0.1-rc1 (Type checker) | Keywords: | Operating System: Unknown/Multiple Architecture: | Type of failure: Incorrect Unknown/Multiple | warning at compile-time Test Case: | Blocked By: Blocking: | Related Tickets: Differential Rev(s): | Wiki Page: -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- The following code when compiled with GHC 8 {{{#!hs {-# LANGUAGE Haskell2010, FunctionalDependencies, KindSignatures, ScopedTypeVariables, TypeOperators, UndecidableInstances #-} import GHC.Generics data Options data Value newtype Tagged s b = Tagged {unTagged :: b} class GToJSON f where gToJSON :: Options -> f a -> Value class SumToJSON f allNullary where sumToJSON :: Options -> f a -> Tagged allNullary Value class AllNullary (f :: * -> *) allNullary | f -> allNullary instance ( AllNullary (a :+: b) allNullary, -- <- removing this line causes a compile error SumToJSON (a :+: b) allNullary ) => GToJSON (a :+: b) where gToJSON opts = (unTagged :: Tagged allNullary Value -> Value) . sumToJSON opts }}} emits a warning {{{ bug.hs:19:10: warning: • Redundant constraint: AllNullary (a :+: b) allNullary • In the instance declaration for ‘GToJSON (a :+: b)’ }}} when commenting out the `AllNullary` constraint, this however results the compile error {{{ bug.hs:19:10: error: • Could not deduce (SumToJSON (a :+: b) allNullary0) from the context: SumToJSON (a :+: b) allNullary bound by an instance declaration: SumToJSON (a :+: b) allNullary => GToJSON (a :+: b) at redconstr.hs:(19,10)-(22,24) The type variable ‘allNullary0’ is ambiguous • In the ambiguity check for an instance declaration To defer the ambiguity check to use sites, enable AllowAmbiguousTypes In the instance declaration for ‘GToJSON (a :+: b)’ }}} -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/11474> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 12

[GHC] #9688: Improve the interaction between CSE and the join point transformation
by GHC 23 Aug '18

23 Aug '18

#9688: Improve the interaction between CSE and the join point transformation -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: dfeuer | Owner: Type: feature request | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: Compiler | Version: 7.9 Keywords: CSE | Operating System: Architecture: Unknown/Multiple | Unknown/Multiple Difficulty: Unknown | Type of failure: Runtime Blocked By: | performance bug Related Tickets: | Test Case: | Blocking: | Differential Revisions: -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- It appears that the join point transformation sometimes interferes with CSE when CSE would be much better. Two examples: === digitToIntMaybe === Suppose we define {{{#!hs isHexDigit :: Char -> Bool isHexDigit c = (fromIntegral (ord c - ord '0')::Word) <= 9 || (fromIntegral (ord c - ord 'a')::Word) <= 5 || (fromIntegral (ord c - ord 'A')::Word) <= 5 digitToInt c | (fromIntegral dec::Word) <= 9 = dec | (fromIntegral hexl::Word) <= 5 = hexl + 10 | (fromIntegral hexu::Word) <= 5 = hexu + 10 | otherwise = error ("Char.digitToInt: not a digit " ++ show c) -- sigh where dec = ord c - ord '0' hexl = ord c - ord 'a' hexu = ord c - ord 'A' -- We could also expand this out in cases manually, but it makes no -- difference as far as I can tell. }}} Suppose we then write a naive `digitToIntMaybe` function: {{{#!hs digitToIntMaybe c | isHexDigit c = Just (digitToInt c) | otherwise = Nothing }}} What I would want this to do is "zip" the nested cases and give Core like this: {{{ $wdigitToIntMaybe $wdigitToIntMaybe = \ ww_s2Ag -> let { x#_a2yy x#_a2yy = -# (ord# ww_s2Ag) 48 } in case tagToEnum# (leWord# (int2Word# x#_a2yy) (__word 9)) of _ { False -> let { x#1_X2z7 x#1_X2z7 = -# (ord# ww_s2Ag) 97 } in case tagToEnum# (leWord# (int2Word# x#1_X2z7) (__word 5)) of _ { False -> let { x#2_X2zh x#2_X2zh = -# (ord# ww_s2Ag) 65 } in case tagToEnum# (leWord# (int2Word# x#2_X2zh) (__word 5)) of _ { False -> Nothing; True -> Just (I# (+# x#2_X2zh 10)) }; True -> Just (I# (+# x#1_X2z7 10)) }; True -> Just (I# x#_a2yy) } digitToIntMaybe digitToIntMaybe = \ w_s2Ad -> case w_s2Ad of _ { C# ww1_s2Ag -> $wdigitToIntMaybe ww1_s2Ag } }}} But instead, the join point transformation triggers, and we get this: {{{ digitToIntMaybe1 digitToIntMaybe1 = \ ww_s2Cp -> error (unpackAppendCString# "Char.digitToInt: not a digit "# ($w$cshowsPrec15 ww_s2Cp ([]))) $wdigitToIntMaybe $wdigitToIntMaybe = \ ww_s2Cp -> let { $j_s2Bc $j_s2Bc = \ _ -> Just (let { a_s2B5 a_s2B5 = int2Word# (-# (ord# ww_s2Cp) 48) } in case tagToEnum# (leWord# a_s2B5 (__word 9)) of _ { False -> let { a1_s2B7 a1_s2B7 = int2Word# (-# (ord# ww_s2Cp) 97) } in case tagToEnum# (leWord# a1_s2B7 (__word 5)) of _ { False -> let { a2_s2B9 a2_s2B9 = int2Word# (-# (ord# ww_s2Cp) 65) } in case tagToEnum# (leWord# a2_s2B9 (__word 5)) of _ { False -> digitToIntMaybe1 ww_s2Cp; True -> I# (+# (word2Int# a2_s2B9) 10) }; True -> I# (+# (word2Int# a1_s2B7) 10) }; True -> I# (word2Int# a_s2B5) }) } in case tagToEnum# (leWord# (int2Word# (-# (ord# ww_s2Cp) 48)) (__word 9)) of _ { False -> case tagToEnum# (leWord# (int2Word# (-# (ord# ww_s2Cp) 97)) (__word 5)) of _ { False -> case tagToEnum# (leWord# (int2Word# (-# (ord# ww_s2Cp) 65)) (__word 5)) of _ { False -> Nothing; True -> $j_s2Bc void# }; True -> $j_s2Bc void# }; True -> $j_s2Bc void# } digitToIntMaybe digitToIntMaybe = \ w_s2Cm -> case w_s2Cm of _ { C# ww1_s2Cp -> $wdigitToIntMaybe ww1_s2Cp } }}} We perform the same three tests twice each, and test for an error condition that obviously can't happen. === `quotRem` and `divMod` === If we define {{{#!hs x `quot` y = fst (x `quotRem` y) x `rem` y = snd (x `quotRem` y) }}} and then write something like {{{#!hs f x y | x `rem` y == 0 = x `quot` y | otherwise = 17 }}} then CSE works some magic and we only calculate `quotRem x y` once. Unfortunately, if we do this: {{{#!hs whatever x y = if x `myRem` y == 0 then (x `myQuot` y) + 14 else x `myQuot` y }}} then the join point transformation fires, collecting the `myQuot x y` expressions in the case branches and preventing CSE from recognizing the much better opportunity to eliminate those calculations altogether. The situation with `divMod` is much worse. The join point transformation applied to the cases defining `divMod` prevents CSE from working magic on it in even simple situations, unless one of the arguments is known, making this definition unusable (the resulting Core is too horrifyingly long to paste here). It would probably be possible to improve the `divMod` situation to something close to the `quotRem` one by making `divMod` `NOINLINE` and adding special `divModLit` rules, but I'd much rather see a general solution. -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/9688> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 4

[GHC] #15087: Internal Error with Bibliography Profiling
by GHC 23 Aug '18

23 Aug '18

#15087: Internal Error with Bibliography Profiling -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: crockeea | Owner: (none) Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: 8.6.1 Component: Compiler | Version: 8.4.2 Keywords: | Operating System: Unknown/Multiple Architecture: | Type of failure: Runtime crash Unknown/Multiple | Test Case: | Blocked By: Blocking: | Related Tickets: Differential Rev(s): | Wiki Page: -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- When running my large program with `+RTS -hb`, I get the following error: {{{ internal error: Invalid object in processHeapClosureForDead(): 7 (GHC version 8.4.2 for x86_64_unknown_linux) }}} Unfortunately, I'm unable to find a minimal example. (Side note: I doubt this is relevant, but this is a multi-threaded program. I first tried to profile with `+RTS -N4 -hb`, but got `-hb cannot be used with multiple capabilities`. I assumed this means it doesn't like `-N4` with `-hb`, so I removed `-N4` and got the above error.) -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/15087> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 8

[GHC] #14973: Location in GHCi debugger prompt printed twice when default prompt is used
by GHC 23 Aug '18

23 Aug '18

#14973: Location in GHCi debugger prompt printed twice when default prompt is used -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: osa1 | Owner: (none) Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: GHCi | Version: 8.5 Keywords: debugger | Operating System: Unknown/Multiple Architecture: | Type of failure: None/Unknown Unknown/Multiple | Test Case: | Blocked By: Blocking: | Related Tickets: Differential Rev(s): | Wiki Page: -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- (Noticed in #8316) Test.hs: {{{#!haskell foo :: [Int] foo = [ 1 .. 10 ] }}} Reproducer: {{{ $ ghc-stage2 --interactive -ignore-dot-ghci Test.hs GHCi, version 8.5.20180325: http://www.haskell.org/ghc/ :? for help [1 of 1] Compiling Main ( Test.hs, interpreted ) Ok, one module loaded. *Main> :break foo Breakpoint 0 activated at Test.hs:2:7-14 *Main> foo Stopped in Main.foo, Test.hs:2:7-14 _result :: [Int] = _ [Test.hs:2:7-14] [Test.hs:2:7-14] *Main> }}} The `[Test.hs:2:7-14]` part is repeated. Setting the prompt fixes it: {{{ $ ghc-stage2 --interactive Test.hs -ignore-dot-ghci GHCi, version 8.5.20180325: http://www.haskell.org/ghc/ :? for help [1 of 1] Compiling Main ( Test.hs, interpreted ) Ok, one module loaded. *Main> :set prompt "> " > :break foo Breakpoint 0 activated at Test.hs:2:7-14 > foo Stopped in Main.foo, Test.hs:2:7-14 _result :: [Int] = _ [Test.hs:2:7-14] > }}} -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/14973> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 6

[GHC] #15059: ghcpkg05 fails
by GHC 23 Aug '18

23 Aug '18

#15059: ghcpkg05 fails -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: bgamari | Owner: (none) Type: bug | Status: new Priority: high | Milestone: 8.6.1 Component: Test Suite | Version: 8.2.2 Keywords: | Operating System: Unknown/Multiple Architecture: | Type of failure: None/Unknown Unknown/Multiple | Test Case: | Blocked By: Blocking: | Related Tickets: Differential Rev(s): | Wiki Page: -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Several people have noted that `ghcpkg05` seems to fail in some environments with (taken from CircleCI, https://circleci.com/gh/ghc/ghc/3654) {{{ --- ./cabal/ghcpkg05.run/ghcpkg05.stderr.normalised 2018-04-19 14:14:29.043902308 +0000 +++ ./cabal/ghcpkg05.run/ghcpkg05.run.stderr.normalised 2018-04-19 14:14:29.043902308 +0000 @@ -10,6 +10,13 @@ cannot find any of ["C/D.hi","C/D.p_hi","C/D.dyn_hi"] cannot find any of ["C/E.hi","C/E.p_hi","C/E.dyn_hi"] cannot find any of ["libtestpkg-2.0-XXX.a","libtestpkg-2.0-XXX.p_a","libtestpkg-2.0-XXX- ghc<VERSION>.so","libtestpkg-2.0-XXX-ghc<VERSION>.dylib","testpkg-2.0-XXX- ghc<VERSION>.dll"] on library path +Warning: include-dirs: /home/ghc/project/compiler/stage2/build/utils doesn't exist or isn't a directory +Warning: include-dirs: /home/ghc/project/compiler/stage2/build/../rts/dist/build doesn't exist or isn't a directory +Warning: include-dirs: /home/ghc/project/compiler/stage2/build/stage2 doesn't exist or isn't a directory +Warning: include-dirs: /home/ghc/project/libraries/haskeline/dist- install/build/includes doesn't exist or isn't a directory +Warning: include-dirs: /home/ghc/project/libraries/text/dist- install/build/include doesn't exist or isn't a directory +Warning: include-dirs: /home/ghc/project/libraries/containers/dist- install/build/include doesn't exist or isn't a directory +Warning: include-dirs: /home/ghc/project/libraries/bytestring/dist- install/build/include doesn't exist or isn't a directory The following packages are broken, either because they have a problem listed above, or because they depend on a broken package. *** unexpected failure for ghcpkg05(normal) }}} -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/15059> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 3

[GHC] #10100: Bogus "redundant constraint" warning with functional dependencies
by GHC 23 Aug '18

23 Aug '18

#10100: Bogus "redundant constraint" warning with functional dependencies -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: jstolarek | Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: Compiler | Version: 7.11 Keywords: | Operating System: Unknown/Multiple Architecture: | Type of failure: None/Unknown Unknown/Multiple | Blocked By: Test Case: | Related Tickets: Blocking: | Differential Revisions: | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Compiling this code with GHC HEAD: {{{#!hs {-# LANGUAGE MultiParamTypeClasses #-} {-# LANGUAGE FunctionalDependencies #-} {-# LANGUAGE FlexibleInstances #-} {-# LANGUAGE UndecidableInstances #-} module T10100 where data Zero data Succ a class Add a b ab | a b -> ab, a ab -> b instance Add Zero b b instance (Add a b ab) => Add (Succ a) b (Succ ab) }}} Gives a bogus warning about redundant constraint: {{{ Redundant constraint: Add a b ab In the instance declaration for ‘Add (Succ a) b (Succ ab)’ }}} -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/10100> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 6

[GHC] #14336: ghci leaks memory
by GHC 23 Aug '18

23 Aug '18

#14336: ghci leaks memory -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: NeilMitchell | Owner: (none) Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: GHCi | Version: 8.2.1 Keywords: | Operating System: Windows Architecture: x86_64 | Type of failure: Runtime (amd64) | performance bug Test Case: | Blocked By: Blocking: | Related Tickets: Differential Rev(s): | Wiki Page: -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- The following script spawns ghci, and that spawned ghci then goes on to leak memory: {{{#!hs import Control.Concurrent import Control.Monad import System.IO import System.Process main = do (Just hin, Nothing, Nothing, pid) <- createProcess (proc "ghci" ["+RTS","-S"]){std_in=CreatePipe} forever $ do threadDelay 100000 -- 0.1s hPutStrLn hin "\"this is a test of outputting stuff\"" hFlush hin }}} This script just writes a string to GHCi, which then echos it back. The {{{+RTS -S}}} is useful to watch the live memory tick up in realtime, but it leaks without it, and the leak can be seen in process explorer (87Mb to 700Mb over about 30 minutes). While repeatedly writing commands may not be a standard usage of ghci, it is when driven by tools such as ghcid (https://hackage.haskell.org/package/ghcid) and other IDE-like uses. -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/14336> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 27

[GHC] #14917: Allow levity polymorhism in binding position
by GHC 22 Aug '18

22 Aug '18

#14917: Allow levity polymorhism in binding position -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: andrewthad | Owner: (none) Type: feature | Status: new request | Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: Compiler | Version: 8.2.2 Keywords: | Operating System: Unknown/Multiple LevityPolymorphism | Architecture: | Type of failure: None/Unknown Unknown/Multiple | Test Case: | Blocked By: Blocking: | Related Tickets: Differential Rev(s): | Wiki Page: -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- The main problem with levity polymorphism in a binding position is that it's impossible to do codegen since the calling convention depending on the instantiation of the runtime representation variable. From the paper, we have the following rejected example code: {{{ bTwice :: ∀ (r :: RuntimeRep) (a :: TYPE r). Bool → a → (a → a) → a }}} However, if you are able to inline the function, this problem disappears. You would need a guarantee stronger than what the `INLINE` pragma provides though since the `INLINE` pragma still allows the function to be fed as an argument to a higher-order function. I'll refer to a hypothetical new pragma as `INLINE MANDATE`. This pragma causes a compile-time error to be admitted if the function is ever used in a way that would cause it to not be inlined. Now `bTwice` would be writeable: {{{ {-# INLINE MANDATE #-} bTwice :: ∀ (r :: RuntimeRep) (a :: TYPE r). Bool → a → (a → a) → a }}} The function definition would be provide in the `.hi` file just as it would be for a function marked as `INLINE`, but unlike the `INLINE` counterpart, there would be no generated code for this function, since generating the code would be impossible. I have several uses for this in mind. I often want a levity-polymorphic variant `ST`. With `INLINE MANDATE`, I still wouldn't get `do` notation, but I could write: {{{ -- This newtype is already allowed today newtype STL s (a :: TYPE r) = STL (State# s -> (# s, a #) #) intA, intB, intC :: STL s Int# wordA, wordB :: Int# -> STL s Word# {-# INLINE MANDATE #-} (>>=.) :: STL s a -> (a -> STL s b) -> STL s b STL a >>=. g = STL (\s0 -> case a s0 of (# s1, v #) -> case g v of STL f -> f s1 myFunc :: STL s Word# myFunc = intA >>=. \a -> intB >>=. \b -> intC >>=. \c -> wordA a >>=. \wa -> wordB b >>=. \wb -> ... -- do something with the data }}} I would appreciate any feedback on this. If there's something that makes this fundamentally impossible, that would be good to know. Or if other people feel like this would be useful, that would be good to know as well. -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/14917> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 22