Re: [GHC] #10443: Regression in forall typechecking

5 Jun 2015

      #10443: Regression in forall typechecking
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
        Reporter:  alanz             |                   Owner:  simonpj
            Type:  bug               |                  Status:  closed
        Priority:  highest           |               Milestone:  7.10.2
       Component:  Compiler (Type    |                 Version:  7.10.1
  checker)                           |                Keywords:
      Resolution:  invalid           |            Architecture:
Operating System:  Unknown/Multiple  |  Unknown/Multiple
 Type of failure:  GHC rejects       |               Test Case:
  valid program                      |                Blocking:
      Blocked By:                    |  Differential Revisions:
 Related Tickets:                    |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by simonpj):

 * status:  new => closed
 * resolution:   => invalid

Comment:

 OK I've looked at this.  It's a bug that 7.8 accepts it.  The offending
 code is
 {{{
     liftBaseWith f = GhcModT . liftBaseWith $ \runInBase ->
         f $ runInBase . unGhcModT
 }}}
 Here is a self-contained smaller version
 {{{
 {-# LANGUAGE RankNTypes #-}
 module Foo where

 type RunInBase m = forall b. m b -> m b

 lbw :: (RunInBase m -> m a) -> m a
 lbw = error "urk"

 foo1 f = (id . lbw) (\r -> r f)
 foo2 f = id (lbw (\r -> r f))
 }}}
 Now `foo2` is accepted by 7.10, but `foo1` is not.  Why is `foo1`
 rejected?

  * Note that `RunInBase` is a polymorphic type.

  * So in `foo2`, in the application `(lbw (\r -> r f))`, GHC can look up
 the type of `lbw`, and propagate it into the argumet `(\r -> r f)`.  So
 `r` gets a polymorphic type, `f :: RunInBase m`.

  * But in `foo1`, the call doesn't look like `(lbw arg)`; instead it looks
 like `(id . lbw) arg`.  So the higher-rank propagation doesn't happen, and
 `r` gets a monotype, something like `r :: t -> m a`.

  * So in the end we get
 {{{
     Couldn't match type ‘t -> m a’ with ‘RunInBase m’
 }}}
 You want proper impredicative polymorphism, and GHC doesn't have that.

 There was a bug in GHC 7.8 that unpredictably allowed certain bits of
 impredicativity, but I fixed that.

 You can fix `ghc-mod` by writing
 {{{
     liftBaseWith f = GhcModT (liftBaseWith $ \runInBase ->
         f $ runInBase . unGhcModT)
 }}}
 So I clain that this is not a bug.

 Yell if you disagree

 Simon

--
Ticket URL: http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/10443#comment:4
GHC http://www.haskell.org/ghc/
The Glasgow Haskell Compiler