
#12027: ghc 8.0rc4 treats INLINE pragmas for methods with default (implicit) definitions as errors -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: carter | Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: high | Milestone: Component: Compiler | Version: 8.0.1 Keywords: | Operating System: Unknown/Multiple Architecture: | Type of failure: GHC rejects Unknown/Multiple | valid program Test Case: | Blocked By: Blocking: | Related Tickets: Differential Rev(s): | Wiki Page: -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- I was getting around to testing some of my maths code with ghc 8.0 and i noticed that whereas in ghc 7.10 and earlier i could have an INLINE pragma for a method of a type class method that has a default implementation (whether this did anything or not is another question), in ghc 8.0 this now gives an ERROR (with not even a warning in ghc 7.10) is this a deliberate design change or an accident? I dont see it in the release notes! heres a small program that illustrates the differences (builds fine with no mention of the INLINE pragma matter under -Wall for 7.10, errors during build in 8.0) {{{ {-# LANGUAGE NoImplicitPrelude #-} module Main where import Prelude (putStrLn) import qualified Data.Functor as Fun import qualified Data.Foldable as F import Prelude hiding (map,foldl,foldr,init,scanl,scanr,scanl1,scanr1,foldl1,foldr1) newtype ListWrap a = ListWrap { unListWrap :: [a] } deriving (Eq, Show) instance Foldable ListWrap where {-# INLINE foldMap #-} {-# INLINE foldr #-} foldMap f (ListWrap ls)= (F.foldMap f ls ) main = putStrLn "hello" }}} this may be a *valid* design change, but i've not seen it documented anywhere, such as the release notes in the RC or in https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/Migration/8.0 ... so i'm assuming its a regression pending dicussion ;) -- Ticket URL: http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/12027 GHC http://www.haskell.org/ghc/ The Glasgow Haskell Compiler