#12959: GHC doesn't warn about missing implementations for class methods beginning with an underscore -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: RyanGlScott | Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: Compiler | Version: 8.0.1 Resolution: | Keywords: Operating System: Unknown/Multiple | Architecture: | Unknown/Multiple Type of failure: Other | Test Case: Blocked By: | Blocking: Related Tickets: | Differential Rev(s): Wiki Page: | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Description changed by RyanGlScott: @@ -26,1 +26,1 @@ - Bug.hs:7:10: warning: [-Wmissing-methods] + Warn.hs:7:10: warning: [-Wmissing-methods] New description: This code compiles without any warnings! {{{#!hs {-# OPTIONS_GHC -Wmissing-methods #-} module Bug where class Foo a where _Bar :: a -> Int instance Foo Int }}} This code, however, //does// emit a warning: {{{#!hs {-# OPTIONS_GHC -Wmissing-methods #-} module Warns where class Foo a where bBar :: a -> Int instance Foo Int }}} {{{ Warn.hs:7:10: warning: [-Wmissing-methods] • No explicit implementation for ‘bBar’ • In the instance declaration for ‘Foo Int’ }}} The only difference is in the name of the class method of `Foo`. Namely, when a class method is prefixed with an underscore, GHC seems to look the other way when checking if any instances are missing an implementation of it. I'd argue that this behavior is incorrect, since I can't envision any scenario in which you'd want the compiler //not// to warn you about missing method implementations (as opposed to, say, not warning about an unused record selector). -- -- Ticket URL: http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/12959#comment:1 GHC http://www.haskell.org/ghc/ The Glasgow Haskell Compiler