Er, we should probably have some guidelines written down about what is suitable for merging to a maintenance branch, but I ''really'' don't think
#9668: Unicode info is out of date -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: dfeuer | Owner: ekmett Type: task | Status: closed Priority: normal | Milestone: 7.10.1 Component: Core | Version: 7.9 Libraries | Keywords: Unicode Resolution: fixed | Architecture: Unknown/Multiple Operating System: | Difficulty: Unknown Unknown/Multiple | Blocked By: Type of failure: Incorrect | Related Tickets: result at runtime | Test Case: | Blocking: | Differential Revisions: | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Comment (by dfeuer): Replying to [comment:7 rwbarton]: this qualifies. I'm reminded of the prayer books my synagogue uses for Rosh Hashanah and Yom Kippur—the holiday date charts in the back were reprinted verbatim from an earlier edition, so they include the dates for the holidays many years ago, but ran out just a few years after the second printing. I personally consider such things as Unicode table update to be part of regular maintenance, rather than new features. Note: if we ''do'' decide to merge to 7.8.4, the tables will have to be generated for that, not copied over from 7.9. -- Ticket URL: http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/9668#comment:8 GHC http://www.haskell.org/ghc/ The Glasgow Haskell Compiler