#12603: INLINE and manually inlining produce different code -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: bgamari | Owner: bgamari Type: task | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: 8.2.1 Component: Compiler | Version: 8.0.1 Resolution: | Keywords: Operating System: Unknown/Multiple | Architecture: | Unknown/Multiple Type of failure: None/Unknown | Test Case: Blocked By: | Blocking: Related Tickets: | Differential Rev(s): Wiki Page: | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Description changed by MikolajKonarski: @@ -2,1 +2,1 @@ - in the case of a manual `INLINE` versus manually inlining. I haven't + in the case of an `INLINE` pragma versus manually inlining. I haven't New description: Mikolaj reported that he was seeing significantly different code generated in the case of an `INLINE` pragma versus manually inlining. I haven't looked into what the cause it and this isn't necessarily problematic; this is just a reminder to look into what is happening. See https://github.com/LambdaHack/LambdaHack/blob/97724fe8c73e80b329ddf326a8eb00.... -- -- Ticket URL: http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/12603#comment:2 GHC http://www.haskell.org/ghc/ The Glasgow Haskell Compiler