#15334: (forall x. c x, forall x. d x) is not equivalent to forall x. (c x, d x) -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: RyanGlScott | Owner: (none) Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: 8.6.1 Component: Compiler (Type | Version: 8.5 checker) | Keywords: Resolution: | QuantifiedConstraints Operating System: Unknown/Multiple | Architecture: Type of failure: GHC rejects | Unknown/Multiple valid program | Test Case: Blocked By: | Blocking: Related Tickets: | Differential Rev(s): Wiki Page: | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Comment (by RyanGlScott): Why are tuples special? After all, the issues persists even if I switch out the tuple for a hand-written class, as shown in comment:2. -- Ticket URL: http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/15334#comment:4 GHC http://www.haskell.org/ghc/ The Glasgow Haskell Compiler