#13589: Possible inconsistency in CSE's treatment of NOINLINE -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: bgamari | Owner: (none) Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: Compiler | Version: 8.0.1 Resolution: | Keywords: Operating System: Unknown/Multiple | Architecture: | Unknown/Multiple Type of failure: None/Unknown | Test Case: Blocked By: | Blocking: Related Tickets: | Differential Rev(s): Wiki Page: | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Comment (by simonpj): That said, it is silly that we can't CSE {{{ {-# INLINE [0] f #-} f x = blah {-# INLINE [0] g #-} g x = blah }}} How could we solve this? Something like this: * Have `cs_map :: CoreMap (OutExpr, Activation)` * Add `blah :-> (f, ActiveAfter 0)` when extending the `cs_map` in `cse_bind`. * In `tryForCSE`, when called from `cse_bind`, pass the `Activation` of the binding (`g` in this example), and check that the `Activation` of the new Id is the same. -- Ticket URL: http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/13589#comment:2 GHC http://www.haskell.org/ghc/ The Glasgow Haskell Compiler