
#8763: forM_ [1..N] does not get fused (10 times slower than go function) -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: nh2 | Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: 8.2.1 Component: Compiler | Version: 7.6.3 Resolution: | Keywords: Operating System: Unknown/Multiple | Architecture: Type of failure: Runtime | Unknown/Multiple performance bug | Test Case: Blocked By: | Blocking: Related Tickets: | Differential Rev(s): Wiki Page: | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Description changed by bgamari: @@ -6,1 +6,1 @@ - {{{ + {{{#!hs @@ -16,3 +16,3 @@ - where - go !n | n == bex = return () - | otherwise = f n >> go (n+1) + where + go !n | n == bex = return () + | otherwise = f n >> go (n+1) New description: Apparently idiomatic code like {{{forM_ [1.._N]}}} does not get fused away. This can give serious performance problems when unnoticed. {{{#!hs -- Slow: forM_ [0.._N-1] $ \i -> do ... -- Around 10 times faster: loop _N $ \i -> do ... {-# INLINE loop #-} loop :: (Monad m) => Int -> (Int -> m ()) -> m () loop bex f = go 0 where go !n | n == bex = return () | otherwise = f n >> go (n+1) }}} Full code example: https://gist.github.com/nh2/8905997 - the relevant alternatives are commented. -- -- Ticket URL: http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/8763#comment:28 GHC http://www.haskell.org/ghc/ The Glasgow Haskell Compiler