However, I don't believe the compiler is the right place for this sort of logic. It is established that you do not know the Ada language compiler.\\ I think your answer is an arbitrary answer. Besides you are not the only one to have this kind of answer in the Committee. Often your responses
#13884: To an automatic compilation of file-header LANGUAGE pragmas in GHC. -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: vanto | Owner: (none) Type: feature request | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: Compiler | Version: 8.0.2 Resolution: | Keywords: Operating System: Unknown/Multiple | Architecture: | Unknown/Multiple Type of failure: Other | Test Case: Blocked By: | Blocking: Related Tickets: | Differential Rev(s): Wiki Page: | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Changes (by vanto): * status: closed => new * resolution: wontfix => Comment: that do not relate to a bug are arbitrary and seems to be controlled by anything other than rational reason.\\ If you close this ticket, you do not correct anything and you forget. I reopen it even if you do not follow it, someone else later will take it into account for a more complete exploitation.\\ You are forty people on the Committee, your opinion alone does not make law to close this ticket. -- Ticket URL: http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/13884#comment:6 GHC http://www.haskell.org/ghc/ The Glasgow Haskell Compiler