#12575: Support US spelling of `specialise` throughout -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: crockeea | Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: Compiler | Version: 8.0.1 Resolution: | Keywords: newcomer Operating System: Unknown/Multiple | Architecture: | Unknown/Multiple Type of failure: Other | Test Case: Blocked By: | Blocking: Related Tickets: | Differential Rev(s): Wiki Page: | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Comment (by tmcgilchrist): I'd like to have a go at fixing this issue. Just so I understand it correctly a fix for this would involve supporting both `specialisation` spelling for that command line argument. I believe I have something working for `-Wmissed-specializations` and `-Wall-missed-specializations`. I couldn't find any specific tests that cover these command line arguments, is there any? As a follow up, I'm not sure if it's required, but there are other flags that appear to have the UK spelling of `specialise` like `specialise- aggressively` and `cross-module-specialise` -- Ticket URL: http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/12575#comment:2 GHC http://www.haskell.org/ghc/ The Glasgow Haskell Compiler