#10448: Implement rest of "Add bifunctor related classes to base"-Proposal -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: hvr | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: 8.0.1 Component: libraries/base | Version: Resolution: | Keywords: Operating System: Unknown/Multiple | Architecture: | Unknown/Multiple Type of failure: None/Unknown | Test Case: Blocked By: | Blocking: Related Tickets: #9682 | Differential Rev(s): -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Comment (by ekmett): It is in the list of simplifications to consider for `Traversable`. If we can show it doesn't help measurably, it'd be a win for simplicity, and the `(bi)sequenceA` name that nobody likes can then eventually die in favor of `(bi)sequence`, whereas the other way there is no actual viable upgrade path that supports its removal. -- Ticket URL: http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/10448#comment:8 GHC http://www.haskell.org/ghc/ The Glasgow Haskell Compiler