#14029: Implement the "Add <&> to Data.Functor" proposal -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: RyanGlScott | Owner: supersven Type: task | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: libraries/base | Version: 8.0.1 Resolution: | Keywords: newcomer Operating System: Unknown/Multiple | Architecture: | Unknown/Multiple Type of failure: None/Unknown | Test Case: Blocked By: | Blocking: Related Tickets: | Differential Rev(s): Wiki Page: | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Comment (by supersven): Would it make sense to commit this as a small proposal to https://prime.haskell.org/, too? The Haskell Report 2010 and Prime are very sparse when it comes to Functors (only stating the laws). E.g. https://www.haskell.org/onlinereport/haskell2010/haskellch6.html#x13-1320006... But I think it would be reasonable to get the functions of "core" (i.e. base) type classes standardized. :) What to you think about this? -- Ticket URL: http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/14029#comment:2 GHC http://www.haskell.org/ghc/ The Glasgow Haskell Compiler