Replying to [comment:40 bgamari]:
darchon, aren't these both symptoms of the same Cabal bug? Namely that `-framework` isn't passed to GHC. It would be great if someone could track down why this is the case.
I would find that hard to believe... because, as seen in comment:21 and comment:27, passing the {{{--ghc-options="-framework GLUT"}}} options to Cabal still doesn't make GHC pass the {{{-framework}}} flag to the system
#10568: Regression from 7.8.4, loading GLUT into GHCI fails on the Mac -------------------------------+----------------------------------------- Reporter: George | Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: 7.10.3 Component: Compiler | Version: 7.10.2-rc1 Resolution: | Keywords: Operating System: MacOS X | Architecture: x86_64 (amd64) Type of failure: GHCi crash | Test Case: Blocked By: | Blocking: Related Tickets: | Differential Revisions: -------------------------------+----------------------------------------- Comment (by bgamari): Replying to [comment:41 darchon]: linker. Ahh, I had forgotten about this result. Yes, this does sound suspicious. Thanks! I believe the relevant portion of GHC is [https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/browser/ghc/compiler/main/DriverPipeline.hs... DriverPipeline.linkBinary]. The framework logic there looks correct but it would be nice if someone with access to OS X could add some traces so we could figure out where things are going awry. -- Ticket URL: http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/10568#comment:42 GHC http://www.haskell.org/ghc/ The Glasgow Haskell Compiler