Re: [GHC] #393: functions without implementations

#393: functions without implementations -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: c_maeder | Owner: Type: feature request | Status: closed Priority: normal | Milestone: ⊥ Component: Compiler (Type | Version: None checker) | Resolution: wontfix | Keywords: newcomer Operating System: Unknown/Multiple | Architecture: | Unknown/Multiple Type of failure: None/Unknown | Test Case: Blocked By: | Blocking: Related Tickets: | Differential Rev(s): Wiki Page: | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Changes (by thomie): * status: new => closed * resolution: None => wontfix Comment: As mentioned in comment:24, the preferred way to do define a function without definition is to use `-fdefer-typed-holes`: {{{ f = _ }}} Let's use our spare development cycles somewhere else, and close this ticket wontfix. Don't hesitate to reopen if you disagree. -- Ticket URL: http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/393#comment:28 GHC http://www.haskell.org/ghc/ The Glasgow Haskell Compiler
participants (1)
-
GHC