#7169: Warning for incomplete record field label used as function -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: goldfire | Owner: (none) Type: feature request | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: Compiler | Version: 7.7 Resolution: | Keywords: Warnings, | newcomer Operating System: Unknown/Multiple | Architecture: Type of failure: Incorrect | Unknown/Multiple warning at compile-time | Test Case: Blocked By: | Blocking: Related Tickets: | Differential Rev(s): Wiki Page: | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Comment (by RyanGlScott):

`-Wpartial-records` may be unnecessary, Because I think It is same meaning to `-Wincomplete-patterns`.

We could include this warning under the scope of `-Wincomplete-patterns`, but I think it's best to keep these two things separate, since one might conceivably wish to disable partial record warnings while still having `-Wincomplete-patterns` on.

It seems useful. But, I do not know if it should affect coding style. Is there any existing design that control warnings by function (or variable) name?

Yes. The underscore prefix is already an established convention for silencing other warnings. For instance, in the code below, GHC will warn about an unused variable `x` in a pattern match: {{{#!hs f x = 42 }}} But GHC will not warn if you prefix `x` with an underscore: {{{#!hs f _x = 42 }}} Similarly, if you have an unused top-level function, GHC will normally warn about it: {{{#!hs module M (a) where a, b :: Int a = 1 b = 2 }}} But not if it's prefixed with an underscore: {{{#!hs module M (a) where a, _b :: Int a = 1 _b = 2 }}} -- Ticket URL: http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/7169#comment:19 GHC http://www.haskell.org/ghc/ The Glasgow Haskell Compiler