[GHC] #14772: Keep Role Annotations in the renamed syntax tree

#14772: Keep Role Annotations in the renamed syntax tree -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: lazac | Owner: (none) Type: feature | Status: new request | Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: Compiler | Version: 8.2.2 (Type checker) | Keywords: | Operating System: Unknown/Multiple Architecture: | Type of failure: None/Unknown Unknown/Multiple | Test Case: | Blocked By: Blocking: | Related Tickets: Differential Rev(s): | Wiki Page: -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Currently role annotations are present in the parsed representation, but missing from the renamed version of the syntax tree. GHC should keep them instead. I found no evidence that this would be intended, we even have `rnRoleAnnots` that should return the renamed annotations. Keeping role annotations would help tooling to be consistent. For example, renaming the datatype should also rename its occurrence in the role annotation. Minimal example: A.hs {{{#!hs module A where import B data A x = A B }}} B.hs {{{#!hs module B where import {-# SOURCE #-} A data B = B (A ()) }}} A.hs-boot {{{#!hs {-# LANGUAGE RoleAnnotations #-} module A where type role A phantom -- the role annotation is needed here data A x }}} When inspecting the representation using the GHC API, the role is present in the parsed representation: {{{ module A where -- Parsed module type role A phantom data A x }}} But missing from the renamed one: {{{ (data A x, [import (implicit) Prelude], Nothing, Nothing) -- RenamedSource }}} -- Ticket URL: http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/14772 GHC http://www.haskell.org/ghc/ The Glasgow Haskell Compiler
participants (1)
-
GHC